Why did the British oppose him? He would’ve made Europe the biggest superpower
They spilled blood so they wouldn’t have to be ruled by a monarch.
>>533591776Envy and fear.
>>533591776why didn't he just do what we said? why did we have to do what he said? for example he knew nothing about India so was not qualified to be in charge of it
>>533591776That's exactly why they opposed him
>>533592044We already tried doing what you said and look where we are today
>>533592165it's like all the things you know about India, all the memes, pictures, redpills, history, food, Hitler didn't know that. Brits generally did. you take the knowledge for granted and associate it with him because you're a nazi too.
>>533591776You answered your won question. Honestly we should have never pursued the 'Splendid Isolation' policy; if we had intervened in, say, the Franco-Prussian war we might have been able to prevent the emergence of Germany as a unified power, and potentially kept Europe in a state of balance where it could never be a real threat to us.
Jews told them to>>533592044Because you morons had no idea what you were doing. Like for Poland Hitler's choices were basically>wait for Soviets to take it over since the new Polish leader was retarded and antagonized everyone around himor>take some of it himself and try to buy time before the Soviets would invade the rest of Europe with IcebreakerMeanwhile the UK just wanted a permanent casus belli there with no understanding of the political or strategic situation, which is why your empire fell. Poland accepting your """guarantee""" (you handed it over to Soviets anyway so, you know, so much for that) actually only enflamed tensions since it was just open that kikes were trying to put Hitler is a strategically bad position and there was nothing he could do to stop it. If the UK and Germany made an Anti Soviet alliance under the condition that Hitler had to guarantee certain Polish rights then things would have been much better. But you guys did everything you could to goad Hitler into attacking just like FDR did with the Japs and Germans as well. All because Jews told them to.
>>533594015Europe was never your biggest threat>oh no we have been invaded by other Whites temporarily but it is unfeasible for them to stay forever because there would be rebellion that they couldn't containis way better than>oh no we are being eradicated from our own gene pool because of kikes and traitors
>>533591776Because she no longer owned her country back then. The fact that they forced their king to abdicate because he liked the Germans too much is all you need to know about this shithole. They deserve their fate.
>>533594265>Because she no longer owned her country back then.*Because they already no longer owned their country back then.
>>533591776But Europe already was the biggest superpower. It could have only be destroyed from within.oops
>>533591776British Empire was the ZOG of it's time. There was no chance of a lasting NS hegemon in Europe while a Judeo-Anglo alliance existed.
>>533594407In 1930, the USA was the world's largest economy, and that was without an empire that allowed them to export their debts.
>>533594015>They were a threatNot to you to though, I can fully understand Polish and Russian opposition, but had you allied with the Germans you would’ve been in on it too like the Italians
>>533594543The guy was talking about the whole decentralized Europe.
>>533591776Because he was a treat to the balance of power in Europe and was vocal about becoming the sole superpower in continental Europe - something the British would never allow. For centuries British strategy for continental Europe rested on one simple objective - prevent any power from dominating Europe, be it France (Napoleonic wars), Russia (Crimean war) or Germany (WW I, WW II). It was natural for Britain and Germany to clash because both had contradicting views and plans for Europe. Hitler understood this well, or at least had to understand, but he was too much emboldened by Rhineland, Austria, Sudetenland and ultimately Czechia not resulting in any serious reactions from Britain. He thought Poland would be the same, but he couldn't be more wrong, because Britain could never allow him to take Poland freely - this would effectively open the gates to the conquest of the rest of Eastern Europe, which would make Germany almost unstoppable. Ultimately, Britain's biggest mistake was failing to enforce the terms of the Versailles Treaty. They miscalculated, thinking Germany would just stop eventually if appeased again and again. But it backfired spectacularly.
>>533594556The entire British elite wanted that; they even sent their children to boarding schools in Germany. But by then, the British elite was no longer the strongest power in the country.
>>533594633It would still have been a close call.
>>533594556>I can fully understand Polish and Russian oppositionRussian sure but Poland literally sided with Germany in taking over Czechoslovakia so they could have a piece too. The issue with Poland is that they were untrustworthy and kept switching sides before the war so naturally no one trusted them except the British who just wanted to use them as a mechanism to start the war. If they sided with Hitler in exchange for guranteed treatment in their own ethnic lands they would have been way better off. But the dude in charge of Poland at the time was delusional. Seriously, read some of this shithttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B3zef_Beck#Strategic_ideas>Beck's "Third Europe" diplomatic concept comprised Poland, Italy, Yugoslavia, Hungary and Romania.[14]>His efforts failed for several reasons:[15]>None of the other four states that was meant to form the "Third Europe" with Poland was interested in accepting Polish leadership.>Both Italy and Hungary preferred to align themselves with Germany, rather than Poland.>The desire of both Italy and Hungary to partition Yugoslavia blocked any effort to include Rome, Budapest and Belgrade in an alliance.>The dispute between Romania and Hungary over Transylvania doomed efforts to include them in a common bloc.>From 1935 to 1939, Beck supported German claims against Czechoslovakia by citing alleged mistreatment of Polish minorities in >Czechoslovakia. In January 1938, he demanded publicly that the Poles living in Czechoslovakia be granted the rights enjoyed by the Germans.[16] He had also begun a diplomatic offensive in favour of Slovak independence in 1937.[17] He supported Hitler's position in the Munich Agreement in 1938. Within days of the agreement, Poland invaded and seized Teschen, an industrial district of Czechoslovakia with 240,000 people, where ethnic Poles formed only 35%.Poland was a complete clown show and was constantly switching sides and coming up with dumb schemes after this guy got in
>>533594707>But by then, the British elite was no longer the strongest power in the country.kekI should have seen that coming though, 'it was ze joooos!!!'
>>533591776Then superpower didn't want competition.
>>533591776Because British grand is that the continent has to be divided. If it's united than the weight of their might together can out weigh Britain plus the empire. This is why through the centuries we se the British favor the 'smaller' powers, portugal, belgium etc.
>>533595061You know they deposed their king because of his friendliness towards Germany?
>>533595158Who? The Jews?
>>533595214Indirectly, yes.
Because Winston Churchill was a raped kikeslave just like Donald Trump.
so they could all become the paki indi muzzy shithole they are now
>>533591776They were wrong to oppose Nazi Germany.But cheer up, what happens today is called "justice". When you see a shitskin spitting, raping or killing a british, try to remember that these guys fought toooth and nail against nazi germany.AND THEN YOU YOURSELF START SPITTING ON HIM!Never let go of this grudge. They deserve it.
>>533594660Insightful. However after the war Britain was no longer a military or economic superpower anyway, as seen in the Suez Crisis of 1956 so what gives?
>>533595214Do you even know what position the British royal family held within the British elite, especially back then? Please name me another group in the British Empire that was powerful enough to depose the king.
>>533594015and they fell...
>>533595343Churchill knew even in '41 that the war was going to cost them big if they kept going but he did it anyway because he didn't want the historical reputation of being a peace broker, he wanted to be seen as "strong" and as a "victor" even at the cost of his nation's own future
>>533595243You basically want Britain to have helped in German conquest of Eurasia. Surely they wouldn't have shared Russia together. (and they would need other allies for that as well)What's in it for Britain?
>>533594099>But you guys did everything you could to goad Hitler into attacking just like FDR did with the Japs and Germans as well. All because Jews told them to.Basically what Trump is doing right now in Iran, losing the American empire.
>>533591776Do danish call Germany Europe like the rest of the world calls US America?
>>533595485There has never been another briton in british history who lived so far beyond his means as churchill. Yet (((someone))) always granted him new credit. I wonder why.
>>533595586Britain can maintain the west as the only real power there. Hitler wasn't interested in it in the immediate sense and consolidating the east would have kept his hands full, especially with his health declining in the 40's but obviously they wouldn't have known that bit. He only allied with Italy because the UK didn't want in
>>533591776Churchill owed some Jew money.For that, The British Empire, and Europe, had to be destroyed.
>>533591776Because Anglokikes are even bigger Jews than actual Jews
>>533595333Too bad the common man in Britain didn't have much in terms of information or say when it came to declaration of war, while the descendants of the actual decision makers are all now living large on masonic pedophile enclaves and enjoying the fruits of their global mixed-raced slave labor.Justice has not been met.
>>533595707>Britain can maintain the westThis couldn't be a serious proposition. You want Britain to help Germany for no reason whatsoever. Country leaders don't do such things. They would be executed as traitors.
>>533595652Not to forget that churchill gambled away his money in the stock market crash and consequently had huge debts, which the jewish austrian henry strakosch paid 1938 back for him.
>>533591776Uniroincally he did nothing wrong
>>533595652He truly was contemptable. Not even just with that shit, but then selling out the Cossacks back to the Soviets too. The faggot whined about it but he gave in anyway. He made a deal with the devil to be seen as "great" despite objectively doing awful things for not just his own nation, but literally every White nation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zusUe3sjMbwAlso don't forget what the Brits did to their own loyal subjects in Rhodesia as well. They didn't even value loyalty in the end or the future, just whatever made their leaders look good in the eyes of kikes at the time. Even after kikes betrayed them post war. Like a beaten dog.>>533595894It was a smarter move than letting the Soviets having the whole east. Hitler at least liked the British and had their interests in mind. Realistically the British could have picked between Hitler and the Soviets and they chose wrong. It cost them more to get involved than not getting involved at all would have cost.
>>533595609Not at all.But a large part of Europe is Germany there’s no way around that. And all of Europe paid the price for this war even today.
>violated terms of WW1 peace treaties, so is completely untrustworthy>allied with communists who Britain viewed as the spawn of Satan himself>made war on nations Britain had allied with defensivelyGee
>>533595904He paid back 18,000 pounds of churchill's debt, which would be about 2 million USD today.
>>533595280> Because Winston Churchill was a raped kikeslave just like Donald Trump.I truly hate how much sense this is making. Well done anon.
>>533596001>And all of Europe paid the price for this war even today.Don't be modest. The entire world, including us Americans, are paying for it too. That is what allowed Jews to completely take control and force us out of isolationism. Even before the war they had control, but it wasn't until after that it was so total
>>533595819Of course, always with excuses.I think nazi germany were pretty straight forward and open with their ideology.The common british man and the american man, knew exactly whom they were fighting. White men like themselves, and they know what their ideology was.But who am i kidding, outside of a select group from 4chan and other online spaces, how many white people are against Hitler and his ideology?How many? 80%? 90%?These guys now, they dont know still? Or rather they know exactly what they are against? Will you find excuses for them too?Make no mistake about it. What happens today is a direct consequence of world war 2, AND IT IS GOD DAMNED DESERVED!
>>533596210>how many white people are against Hitler and his ideology?If you subtract boomers it is lessening by the day. Boomers are the biggest hold out by far.
>>533595904Western politicians still take bribes from the jews.
>>533595343They never expected the war to go the way it did. Most importantly, few if any thought that France would fall so quickly, espcially after the same strategy failing during WW I. What I cannot understnd is their original endgame for the war - I sincerely doubt they had planned to march all the way to Berlin from the get go and force an unconditional surrender. Or maybe I am just thinking in XXI century realities too much and that was exactly what they had anticipated. Bottom line, however, is that they could not let a single power dominate Europe, that would crash their Empire even sooner.
>>533595983Their empire was thoroughly jewish. But england wasn't. That's my point. The english back then, just like the americans today, had little control over their empire.
>>533591776Pride before the fall, after WW2 the British Empire crumbled.
Britain feared, rightly probably, that if a power on the continent got too powerful it would come to dominate the UK as well so the UK's policy has long been to ensure no European power rises to dominate the whole of Europe. This outlook isn't new either it is the same reason they fought Napoleon.
>>533596210Most people are the descendants of peasants who don't have the capacity for non-group based decision making. Democracy and liberalism is a lie. 90% of men and 100% of women are always going to believe whatever the state consensus is in any nation.
>>533596401The jews wanted a fractured war torn Europe so they could cement their power.A white hegemony talking openly about them as the greatest threat to western civilization had to be destroyed.That's what they hoped to accomplish with the first world war but it backfired.After ww2 they didn't leave anything to chance, and now we are still living with the consequences. Now they are trying to ethnically cleanse all white people of European origin.
>>533596564All the capital had already migrated to america by 1938. They used the rest of the british empire only to halt germany's rise, whose economy had also already surpassed the british empire by 1938.
>>533592934He generaly thought that indians needed supervision. The only weakness hitler had was his anglophilia desu.
>>533596805Only America rivaled the German economy and their living standards.
>>533594015We should have had an even more isolationist policy, had we never entered WW1 we wouldn't have to deal with any of it, Germany would have never been a problem for us, look at Switzerland, we should have done exactly what Switzerland did and we would probably be ruling over europe today from our sheer advantage of competence. Germany was always a paper tiger which we constantly poked and poked due to political squabbles and it just caused a gigantic mess for us and everyone in the region which could have been entirely avoided to our great advantage. Sadly we became incompetent and pursued a policy of splendid meddling.
>>533596974Yes, the jews have already moved on to the next empire. But they used the old one through churchill to stop germany and create israel. And not even the english king could stop them.The parallels to today are striking, except that china does not grant them access. I still don't know whether that makes their reaction more or less dangerous for us.
>>533594265>>533594707>>533595158>>533595355Politics is a theatre, the British and German royals were cousins even in WW1, it's like Prince Andrew being 'unprinced', it's all an illusion. There is only a distinction in the countries of Germany and Britain, their rulers have been the same for centuries, not much has changed in that regard.
>>533597307They had the power to depose your king and had already moved the capital to the USA. You never had a chance to get out of it unscathed.
>>533597620We had our boys on the throne in russia too. And who dethroned them there? Exactly.
>>533596974There was no German economy, it was entirely based on a pyramid scheme of capturing and taxing more and more land, properties, assets and resources and backing it with central bank fiat money, it was always going to end at some point because there isn't infinite land to invade, by the time they lost their economy was probably in tatters because the theft of land had dramatically slowed which weakened their military even more.
>>533597875Whose boys? You're a German royal?
>>533597979Wrong
>>533597979That's nonsense. The Ruhr area was an industrial powerhouse. Coal and steel galore. Similar to Birmingham and the West Midlands.
>>533598069If I have the choice between German aristocrats and jews?
>>533597979>There was no German economySo where did their army come from if they had no industry, or economy like you say?They had the strongest economy and even rivaled the american economy.Regarding living standards they had the highest living standard in Europe before the war was declared on them.Britain was a rundown place in comparison to Germany.
>>533598202>No counter-argumentSeethe.
>>533598228Industry does not equal economy, otherwise the soviets would have had a great economy, they didn't, their people were destitute and starving with almost no wealth.
because one fat, loathsome fucking drunkard toad named Churchill was too addicted to the bottle and gamba.that's literally itthat's the reason the greatest human tradegy occurred,that's why we are all sentenced to watch the slow gruesome death of the west.
>>533597979>There was no German economyhttps://youtu.be/gyHSFZ4fIh4?t=321Watch this.
>>533596805> All the capital had already migrated to america by 1938Correct and it was a lot of capital. And from where? I don’t suppose anyone would claim that this was in the best interest of the British people I’d say it’s fair to argue the British were sold out from within
>>533598361Aren't the rothschilds also german aristocrats? I choose neither to rule over me thanks.
>>533591776Yeah he’d do that… by killing Europeans all across the continent, and allying with some gooks in the far east and some gayrabs and pajeets who want independence. Sure.
>>533598482So Germany during the 1930's had the same living standards as the soviet union is what you are saying?How did the soviet union industrialize by the way, have you heard about the gulags?Forced labor, slavery.But sure it worked, the soviet union industrialized very quickly.That's not how it was done in Germany before the outbreak of war.
>>533598526Let me guess they measured the '''economy''' in the nonsense GDP, that explains how your stupid youtube video says that the soviets had economy close to america even though many couldnt even attain the luxury item of bread. It's a myth like most 'economics' these days.
>>533598598The western allies deployed colonial troops in Europe during both world wars.France and Britain declared war on Germany, you can stop lying now kike.
>>533598539>British peopleNone of that was in their interest. That's why I say that the British had already lost control of their empire back then.
>>533598386If you would bother to actually read what I said I told you exactly where it came from, simple pillaging tied to central bank war bonds.Once their military conquest slowed down the whole thing came crashing down as is inevitable with all pyramid schemes.
>>533598698Copium They were communist, that's why.The state decided what commodities were to be produced and how much.
>>533598754He’s the very reason why Europe isn’t a superpower today, no wonder nazis are retarded cucks keeeek, they worship a man who literally killed them the most. Not even the muhammed crusades could do that
>>533598698So, the GDP isn't the economy, but industry isn't the economy either. What is the economy then? Corner shops and barbershops?
>>533598872>He’s the very reason why Europe isn’t a superpower todayWestern allies who fought two world wars against European hegemony is the reason actually.It's not our fault that you are brown and circumcised, but sure you blame us for everything.Typical jewish behavior.
>>533591776Europeans already ruled the world. You get Germans online always talking about WW1 too, saying shit like "If Germany had won WW1 the white man would rule the world" - yeah, we already did, and could have done without tens of millions of dead white men because of German paranoia.
>>533598988Europe was doing fine and was dominating the world until your cuckold hero appeared who then shot himself like a cuck and died childless aged 50, just like his fanbase today KEK
>>533598680Good strawman, I told you how the Germans acquired their short-term plundered wealth but keep ignoring it if you want to.I'm no hater of Germany i'm just stating the facts, Germans are a hardworking and intelligent people but most of their wealth is destroyed by the high taxation they tend towards and it's the same in britain now, we have wealth despite these tendencies not because of them as many parasites would have you believe.
>>533592044why indeed
>>533598864>They were communist, that's why.What? That's why what?
>>533599087>Good strawman, I told you how the Germans acquired their short-term plundered wealth but keep ignoring it if you want to.Im talking about Germany before the war, but you don't seem to get it.I accept your concession Isaac. Get some more meat on your bones, no one wants to discuss with a disingenuous heeb like yourself.>>533599061>Europe was doing fineLmao, yeah right.Said no historian ever.
>>533598977Average/total wealth, money, assets etc.GDP is a nonsense term where if i give you 100 dollars and you give me back 100 dollars then the GDP has increased by 200 dollars, total nonsense they use to manipulate numbers.
>>533599238>even though many couldnt even attain the luxury item of breadI think you are suffering from amnesia?Must be the mental scars sustained from being snipped?Aren't you the same kike that claimed Germany and the soviet union were allies?So much for you "stating the facts" lmao
>>533599035America had overtaken you economically long before World War I. Germany had overtaken you shortly before World War I. The jews were about to transfer their capital to the USA. Your end was sealed. Had you joined Germany, large parts of your empire would probably have survived.
>>533599364>they use to manipulate numbers.Who're they?You're starting to sound like Hitler.
>>533599364What value do assets and money have if they don't represent a share of industrial output? You can go to zimbabwe and have vast amounts of money.
>>533599035Churchill spearheaded the Allies with FDR and Stalin. Instead of seeing Hitler’s vision for Europe he opposed it and exacerbated the bloodshed by committing to war, the British empire fell afterwards along with the Nazi empire what do you make of that?
redpill in case anyone doesnt know how GDP works.
>>533599659Everyone here knows how these figures are manipulated. My point was more about your statement that industry isn't the economy.
>>533599436Germany didn't overtake Britain before WW1. You're talking total bullshit. They were significantly poorer than us. They overtook in the "German miracle" era in the 1950s, which was the product of millions of hours of European people being enslaved in German industry during WW2 then coming out of WW2 without any of that industry being wiped out. British soldiers restarted VW then handed it back to that local state.
>>533599782It isn't, think about it even slightly, I pay you a billion dollars to produce 50000 tonnes of of steel and just leave it on the ground to rust, huge industry zero economy. That's actually how it works in socialism because a commisar just dictates what you should do and produce and huge wastes occur and end up starving the population to death.
>>533599817>1913>Industry Germany / Great Britain >Steel production 18.9 million tons / 7.7 million tons >Coal production 277 million tons / 292 million tons >Electrical industry World market leader (35%) / Lagging >Chemical industry Dominant (80% of dyes) / Medium
>>533599403I simply asked for you to clarify your claim and you refused, because your claim is bullshit.
>>533599462Most modern economists and all socialists, like Hitler.
>>533600023You've been bullshitting all this time Ranjeet.
>>533591776>Why did the 'British' jews oppose himFtfy
>>533600107Whatever if you're not going to argue against me and simply tell me what you were claiming then i've already won.
>>533599564Good point on money, just wealth in the form of assets then. What value does industrial output have if no one owns any assets and everyone is homeless? None.
>>533591776Happy belated, Uncle. I was thinking about you all day yesterday.
>>533600175I did clarify but you're to daft to remember the statement in your own post i replied to?>then i've already won.Megalomania, typical
>>533600422Then say it again to humor me or just stop yapping pointlessly.
>>533600320>if no one owns any assets and everyone is homeless?Germany were nationalsocialist, the state didn't own all the businesses.And they had the highest living standard in Europe before the war, so people weren't exactly homeless or starving for that matter.There were plenty of jobs.Stalin used forced labor to industrialize the soviet union, and Britain relied on exploitations of their colonies, another form of slave labor.
>>533600671I think we both need to learn to stop a discussion as soon as we realize that the other person is clearly lacking in brainpower. It really leads nowhere. I'm out.
>>533591776There are usually three great powers in mainland Europe: Britain, France, and Germany. Russia was always and outsider force. This of course is mostly discounting sea powers and colonies etc.Britain on their Island took the stance of playing France and Germany against each other. A united France and Germany would mean (in British eyes) the end of British rule. This isn't the case anymore (France and Germany are now locked together economically in the EU). Back in foot-peasant-army days, which Napoleon epitomized, and WWI was a gruesome evolution of, everything felt like the Cold War where you have to stop the next closest enemy at all costs. Hitler's tactic was to sue for peace repeatedly with Britain, fearing an escalated war. Britain wanted to play France and Germany against each other. Germany made the best play they could but then had to fight Britain and the USSR, and regrettably the USA got involved. At least we made money with the Marshall Plan.
>>533600671Even before the war Hitler installed fiat money via the central bank, which led to it becoming necessary to invade land or it would have hyperinflated. It was so incredibly short term. You can get a lot of stuff short term while destroying everything long term. Austrian economists call this time preference, which socialists have very little of.>Stalin used forced labor to industrialize the soviet union, and Britain relied on exploitations of their colonies, another form of slave labor.Yeah and the point is their economies were still shit regardless of their mass slavery because for the tenth time, industry does not equal economy.
>>533600943Bye midwit! Don't let the tail between your legs hit you on the way out.
>>533600943Agreed my friend, it's too tiresome.
>>533601051>which led to it becoming necessary to invade land or it would have hyperinflatedMefo bills were not any less unstable than our current fiat now. US money is backed on hopes and dreams too but we don't have the excuse of trying to build something worth while.There are moves Hitler could make to lessen a crash, it would just make investors unhappy. But investors and speculators are the biggest bunch of parasites anyway. They are important to a degree but it is a mistake to sacrifice everything to cater to them
>>533601111I know it's tiring for you to use your puny mind, giving a simple counterargument is like running a marathon for you socialists. Just go back to reading Marx, mein kampf or keynes.
>>533601006>At least we made money with the Marshall Plan.You sure did and I'll have a look at that book
>>533601234>Mefo bills were not any less unstable than our current fiat now.I enjoy that you don't see the irony of this statement, look at what America is doing now, they are forced to get themselves stuck in Iran, the fiat banking gravy train is coming to an end for America as it came to an end for Germany, the Soviet Union and all countries with a shit fiat money system.
>>533601289>Just go back to reading Marx, mein kampf or keynes.You should take your own advice, then you would know what set these ideologies apart from each other. >Muh luxury bread>What about the hecking homeless pipo?Dumbass.
Bank Of England. Financiers. Balfour Declaration policy remnantsHow do Euro's not know this, yet a typical burger does?
>>533594015It's crazy that 1 nation could rule like 20 nationsThe British empire is some anime shit
>>533601385Yeah it also lays out the shitshow that is the Middle East. Also how South America is fucked by design.I also like "How to Hide an Empire" if you're interested in war economy shenanigans.
>>533601428Yeah except the US started from a strong position and declined. Hitler had a bad starting hand and was trying to work his way up with hard work since he literally didn't have the resources or infrastructure that America has now. He was the one who had to build the autobahns and needed funds to do it, America has fiat and just uses it to enrich Jews with zero benefit, infrastructural, governmental, or cultural, to the nation. The two aren't really comparable except in that they both use currencies that were backed by the government rather than specific value. Also we aren't forced to be in Iran. There is in fact no reason we should have even been there at all besides the kike lobby and corrupt faggots there
>>533601471>then you would know what set these ideologies apart from each other.I already know they all had different justifications and excuses for their parasitic central banking theft from the productive class.I know all of them inside and out, that's easy, but unlike you i understand also the parasitic system which they all share and i don't care too much about the ideological nonsense.
>>533601743Regardless of the starting position, any country with a strong powerful central bank is doomed to destruction.
>>533601912>any country with a strong powerful central bank is doomed to destructionNot necessarily. As long as you have house cleanings and purges every once in a while you can last for a while. The issue isn't that, it is corruption that any powerful institution attracts. There should be a natural ebb and flow of power and really a lot of things in a nation. If people are clinging to one institution despite all corruption it needs a purge, no matter what it is. It isn't about the power itself being evil, it is about who is using it.
>>533601912>any country with a jewish central bank is doomed to destruction
>>533591776cant be the biggest in anything when angloids are around who take offense in other whites being greater than them.its all just a struggle for piece of shit genes that want to stay in the pool. the world isnt fair.most people are worthless pieces of shit.dont dwell on this so much, it will only get worse.i cope with alot of drugs.
>>533602083>Not necessarily.No. Necessarily, a state monopoly on the banking system always destroys the economy and the nation. That's actually how most empires collapse, the bigger the central bank, the quicker the collapse.>>533602180Whether a Jew or a goy or an asian is controlling your central bank, it will always create inflation and collapse.
>>533594660and you niggers should have been balkanised decades ago for your genocidal crimes against christians, even the chinks barely tolerate you
>>533602410sure thing Moishe
>>533602410>a state monopoly on the banking system always destroys the economy and the nationNot really. Of course corruption always ends up festering there but let's be real, it is corruption killing the nation not the bank.To say otherwise is to say a gun can kill on it's own when it is but a tool. Central banks are not sapient, they simply reflect the desires of those that control it. There are times when a central bank is necessary and times when it is not, but frankly speaking it is better to have a tool and to consider all options with it than to not have it.Private banks don't even have to pretend to care about the nation, and with the absence of a central bank it is only a matter of time until one fills that vacuum.
>>533602615>Not really.Yes really, the large central bank is itself the corruption and is caused by corruption, don't believe me just read a history book. All the greatest empires faced hperinflation and self-termination by central bank when they became corrupt.
>>533602730>the large central bank is itself the corruptionRetard
>>533601006In the current post-decolonization post-brexit timeline, it might be best for the world if Britain tries out some kind of neo splendid isolationism where they stop trying to divide Europe and instead focus on cooperation with the rest of the anglosphere. I forget who, but I remember that there was some Englishman around the early 1900s (it might have been Cecil Rhodes or Rudyard Kipling) who conceived of the Anglo countries as a third pillar of western civilization alongside Europe and the US. And then mainland Europe would mainly be led by a Franco-German alliance.
>>533591776You know why, it's the fault of that damn parasite.
>>533602794>No counterargumentYep, central banking is a parasitic virus for any culture or nation, it should be shrunk down to obscurity.
>>533603029This is as delusional as any other similar Libertarian belief where they posit that any "central" or "powerful" entity is by its very nature evil. There is no use arguing with a zealot. Why should I waste my time?
>>533592025>EnvyLol, lmao
>>533602830An anglosphere confederation would be the next logical step for Anglo civilization, sadly most anglo countries are shit now and it's our own fault. However maybe we can have a 'parallel' anglosphere consisting of only the best regions of each anglo country, maybe subdivided worldwide into various small expat communities which are well secured, an evolution of Rhodes's 'roundtable' idea, there's a book called the network state which deals with ideas like this in the modern world. I'm sure most anglosphere countries are aware that the situation they find themselves in is unsustainable at this point.
>>533603206>where they posit that any "central" or "powerful" entity is by its very nature evil.That's a simple strawman I never said that.Why don't you deal with my actual argument? Is it too powerful? Central banking is objectively destructive to any people, a state monopoly over the money supply is just as bad as any other monopoly, but even worse because it's enforced by force. Power or centralization is not inherently bad, but the absolute destruction of any competition to it is indeed evil and terribly destructive on all levels, especially over the money supply which is so important.
>>533603545>That's a simple strawman I never said that.I never said you did, I just said that it is a similar sentiment. If you are coming from the position that any organization of any kind is just evil by nature then you can't be convinced. All organizations are just reflections of the people who direct them. They are mere tools. If you can't understand something so basic then there is nothing to discuss and you can stew in your delusion. Libertarians claim what you claim as well. They also claim so for government or really any institution that has "authority" and run in circles about definitions and smaller things of no import.Central banking in it's current form is a blight but if your position is that "no, it can never be fixed and it itself is an unforgivable evil that must be abolished even if virtuous people are put in charge" then there is no grounds on which a discussion can take place because that is a fundamental disagreement on reality itself and the nature of organization.
>>533602830>>533603351All anglo countries became money-obsessed. The migrants-at-all-costs policies have been introduced to increase demand and thus prices. So established whites and jewry profit while newcomers and poorer whites have to go into deep debt to maintain even some superficial image of success. As that's becoming more impossible people are getting really upset.
>533603889The next phase of this nonsense is best called "starving times." Expect rampant joblessness, homelessness, etc. This is coinciding with the great brain rottery so always have fall-back plans and redundant methods. Be prepared to move. I wanted to live here in this nice town, but urban blight has crept so far I have to white flight either somewhere else to a more expensive home. So I have to put up with darkies for now. So much darkness, all around me.
>>533603873>I never said you didSo argue against what I'm saying instead of your strawmen of it then.>If you are coming from the position that any organization of any kind is just evil by nature then you can't be convinced.Lol I never said anything like that either, all you make up is strawmen.You can't grasp even a basic nuance like organization is fine but the monopolization of organizations by excessive force and destruction of perfectly healthy competition is bad, your ideology forces you to miss these nuances on purposes because otherwise it would collapse.If you want to have an argument with yourself between various strawmen youve made up that fight eachother then go ahead but it's quite pointless in reference to what i've argued.
>>533603276Every european power had its golden age. The spanish, the french, the dutch, russians, italians, etc etc. They all passed gracefully into the sunset. But when it was time for the beady eyed anglo to walk into that same sunset and pass the olympian torch of ascendancy to germany.. well they destroyed everything including britain itself rather than follow the countless empires before.Now here we are, sitting in the post-modern ruins of a once great civilizatiom which conquered the planet and made up 1/3 of the global population. Reduced to strangers in our homelands. Ghosts in our own towns and cities. Inhabitants of a living ghoulish museum which barbarians freely loot at will.
>>533598562no they are jewish you absolute helmet
Churchill and the focus group.
>>533605343One surprising thing is just how good the literature, the ideas, and the significant figures were right about the time of the Victorian Era. That was the absolute apex of European civilization. Probably the apex of mankind generally, in terms of cultural sophistication. The path to the future was untested, nobody really knew which way to proceed. The vision laid out by Charles Darwin and his Eugenics movement, was Europeans killing off the savage races, and colonizing the world, and then using eugenics to rise from a beastly state into a truly advanced species. That was the correct path forward.Instead, these weird liberal movements sprang up everywhere, Africa was decolonized. Then WW1 and WW2 completely obliterated that civilization altogether. That was the end. I think you will find, the liberal stuff was commie organizing, jewish at its root. WW1 and WW2 were also jewish at the root. Fundamentally the problem this whole time, was this small group of jewish financiers that Henry Ford was telling everyone about. It isn't even all jews, but it's this small collection of 100 people or so, at the top. doing this.
>>533605819> Fundamentally the problem this whole time, was this small group of jewish financiers that Henry Ford was telling everyone aboutHitler may also have brought up the jewish problem at one point or another
>>533595010>Poland literally sided with Germany in taking over Czechoslovakia so they could have a piece tooI appreciate starting your post with that part Saar, saves people with any history knowledge from reading further
>>533592025They were also funded by Jews, not dissimilar to our current state of affairs.>”It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard, for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out. Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow“—Adolf Hitler1945
>>533606079Yeah in fact I heard Hitler loved Henry Ford so much, he kept his book by his nightstand.
>>533606356Germanishers took 45T from Poland saarYou fags can't be trusted
>>533592044Faggot jew.
>>533599659
>>533591776Because they are faggots, Germany was everything they ever wanted to be but couldnt.>>533605343Beautiful, and sad.
>>533604490Lots to unpack here but I don't think monopoly is a bad thing all the time and "excessive" in excessive force is too vague.
>>533607552Kek based.
