Imagine you have to design a society, but you don’t know who you’ll be in it. You could be rich or poor, strong or weak, privileged or marginalized.Now decide the rules.What kind of system would you create, when you know you might end up at the very bottom?
>>533630148No Jews and no Indians. That’s the first thing.
How about you do a thought experiment called 'shut the fuck up, jeet'?
it'd be pretty similar to the one i already live in desudemocracy, rule of law, mixed economy, egalitarian, merit-based but with social safety netsI could expand on each of those but it's more trouble than it's worth
Have you considered MAiD service?
>>533630148But if I'm at the very bottom it's probably because I'm a retarded criminal who's a waste of space. Why would accomodating me be good for society?
>>533630148Renaissance ideal city would be my guiding principle
>>533630148Whites only
>>533630148>>533630525If you think about it the veil of ignorance needs the strong assumption that everyone is identical to start with and we're all souls dropped into random physical bodies. It's blank slateism.
>>533630431>democracy, rule of law, mixed economy, egalitarian, merit-based but with social safety netswhat kind of gayfag globohomo bullshit is thisyou should maid yourself
>>533630148This thought experiment is just a sophistic logic trap. We would never design a society from this perspective because it’s impossible to live in a dynamic, changing system that we can influence directly and pretend we can’t. The only purpose of the question is to pigeon hole people into basically saying:>if you had to design a society but the only choice other than some commoid egalitarian distribution model results in you possibly being a poor nigger retard, what would you pick?
>>533630148> Now decide the rules.Whites only No swissNo polesThat’s it. The population can work out the rest of the rules.
