>>533640935
Not this schizophrenic shit again

Females

Women equality vs inequality with males. Should women have same rights, same jobs, same everything, as men? No. The evolution made females and males different, they are built in different way and their purpose in society was always different and should be different. Females have different skeletons, brains, hormones, looks, strength, hobbies. They shouldn't do same things as males. If evolution "thought" that equality is good, then females and males would look the same, have same brains, skeletons, everything.

What a "equality" policy of females does is, it destroys the diversity of the sexes. This is invented by capitalists, because they don't need males and females, they need workers, or actually, slaves. They want males and females to look in same way and do same jobs. This will also tank birth rates, but capitalists don't care about that because they don't think long term. They only want short term profits, even if they will destroy society or planet Earth.

Capitalists invented "equality" and put women into workplace in order to have double amount of workers and to drop the wages by half. They want women and men to compete for jobs.

But should we have full segregation of the sexes like in the middle east and Afghanistan? Not necessarily. If full political power is given to males, they often do wars, war crimes, nazism, holocaust and all kinds of stuff. Also, some females have male talents and they are capable of doing male jobs. This is why I am leaning to a compromise system, where most females should be stay-at-home wives or work female jobs like nurses, but some females could have real careers and work in male jobs.

One possibility is a two-tier system, where a young female is tested for her intellect and talents and she is either classified into a mother/wife or into a career woman. The first one will have to marry someone and give him babies and cook food, while the second one will be allowed to study, work, do male jobs, drive a car.

Females 2

Divorces. Divorces are bad and they are promoted by the capitalists. They need divorces because after divorce the couple needs two houses/apartments instead of one. A lonely woman is also sad and buys a lot of wine, products, movies, she buys a lot of stuff to fill her shallow and empty life. Divorces = less children. Divorces = children do not have families. I am not saying divorces should be fully banned, but they should be restricted, a couple should first try to fix their relationship and not jump to divorce.


Should rape in marriage be allowed? Or if not, at least, wives should be punished for not giving sex with fines and arrest, or divorced with their fault. Giving sex is wife's duty.


Adultery. Adultery should be punished. But I am not sure if males should also be punished for it, or only females. The adultery of a male and female are not the same thing.


We need to lower age of marriage. If sex with 12 year old girls was bad, the evolution wouldn't give them puberty and period, and evolution wouldn't make them sexy. But they have period, can be impregnated and they are sexy, so it's clear that nature and evolution want us to fuck and impregnate little girls.

Sex and marriage with little girls is illegal because of organized mafia of capitalists and old females. Capitalists do not want men to have good things for free, while old females do not want better competition, they cannot compete with little girls. Little girls are superior in every way to old hags.

Fertility rate

How to make people actually have babies, like in the past? There are many ways to achieve this:

removing many women from workplace so they get bored at home and have babies out of boredom

ban goyphones (mobile phones), social media, TV and soap operas, or ban them just for females, so that they are bored at home and want babies out of boredom

limit or ban contraception. Banning might give result of having too many babies. Contraception could also be legal only for couples that already have at least two kids

limit education of women, only send some women (with high potential) to education, most women should be uneducated, at least before they produce two or more babies. Females should first have kids, when they are young, then after this they could study and work (if at all)

ban owning of cats and dogs, females own them instead of kids, they treat them as kids

lower age of marriage and marry young girls, at their puberty or even earlier. The younger the marriage and first pregnancy, the more kids a woman can have

make that at some hours during Saturday or Sunday, the electricity, TV, internet will stop working. This will make people have sex and possibly get pregnant

make that big houses are cheap and make people live in houses in the suburbs or countryside. When people see empty spaces (in the house and outside), they want to fill them with something, for example with children

have people own houses/apartments or rent from the state, because when people rent from private capitalists, they don't have stability, they fear they can be evicted at any time

tax benefits for people with children. Lower property taxes and rent (they need bigger apartments and houses), lower income taxes. Direct payments of money to people with children can be considered but they are not great, they can attract the wrong people to have children, the "bottom" people

Fertility rate 2


make places and events where peak males (30-40 old) can meet peak females (6-14 old) to find a girlfriend and then a wife. Or alternatively, arrange marriages, by families or by the state


allow dads to have some "fun" with his daughter, at night in the bed and during bathing. This is controversial but it would give motivation to males to have children. However, negative effect of this would be that the future husband of this daughter won't get perfect, pure, virgin product. Another similar idea is to allow dads to sell their daughters to males as wives, this would give monetary motivation to have children and daughters. I am not sure though if monetary motivation is a good motivation to have children

stop women from selecting who their husband is

allow rape in marriage. Controversial but could increase fertility rate

The methods that I listed really work but you will never see capitalist nation implement them, because they only lie that they want high fertility rate, or even if they wanted, short term profits of capitalists are more important than long term interests of a nation.

Diversity and race-mixing

Should we have a lot of race mixing to create one race of gnomes/mutts that live everywhere around the world? No.

This is what the (((globalists))) want but this is dumb and evil. They call it a "diversity" but it is the opposite of diversity. The real diversity is when you have different people, races, cultures, in various places in the world. You have Japanese people, Indian people, Eskimo people, Spanish, Slavs, Negros, Latinos, Chinese. They are each different and they evolved to fit into their geographical region. For example, Negros have black skin to protect them from strong sun in central Africa.

Diversification of races, genes, cultures has many benefits to the world. If we had some kind of disease or pandemic around the world, some races could be immune or have a better health outcomes. If we have only one mutt race, then just one disease can kill the whole population. Another benefit of various races and cultures is that traveling or even browsing the internet is actually interesting, you can meet someone different from you and from your country.

It is better when there is many races of humans and they mostly live in their region but we should allow some special cities or countries where for example, scientists from all regions would come and live, work together on some big projects.

Arts, culture, entertainment

The capitalists destroyed all art, music, video games, movies, books. They are now creating the dumbest shit for the dumbest person. Instead, we should subsidize higher quality art and entertainment.

For example, in TV, we could ban ads and instead give money to TV channels based on their viewership. However, there would be multipliers. If TV is playing some dumb goywood movie, the multiplier would be 0.5x or 1.0x, if TV is playing documentary or science, the multiplier would be much bigger, like 4x or 5x. This would motivate TV to make higher quality programs instead of soap operas and movies.

In radio and music, we should limit the number of pop radio stations and we should have similar mechanics like in TV, that radio stations are paid for listeners but with multipliers, if they play classical or ambient music they would get paid more per listener than when playing pop or rap.

holy FUCK nobody cares bro

>>533642824
Go back to tiktok mutt

Capitalism

Capitalists are like whales. To one capitalist being alive, he needs to exploit, kill, enslave 1000 poor people. Just like whales need to eat 1000 fishes per day. This is ineffective and they have to be stopped. One capitalist uses as much resources as 10 000 people in Africa. We cannot afford to keep them alive. I propose capitalist extinction. When capitalists gather all resources and wealth, the rest people do not have them.


Capitalism. Under capitalism, we are giving 90% of earth wealth and resources to 70 year olds. Is this a good allocation? How many children do 70 year olds make? How much do they work? How much inventions and science theories do they make?


Capitalism is temporary and unstable system. However, it doesn't end up in communism, like Marx predicted, but it ends up in feudalism. Supercommunism is the opposite of capitalism and feudalism.


Capitalist honeymoon phase. When poor countries first introduce capitalism, they often benefit in the beginning, there is more food and goods for the population. This is the honeymoon phase. After this phase, the real capitalism begins. If you do not belong to the wealthiest 10%, you won't even afford a single apartment. And it will be even worse in the future. Capitalism is a trap for people and nations that prefer to get one candy right now and then end up in hell, than to get much bigger prize but after longer time and effort.

Not only that, but sometimes there isn't even a honeymoon phase in capitalism. Example of this is Russia, that was never better during capitalism than it was in communism.

File: 1762736961365.jpg (25 KB, 360x203)

25 KB JPG

>>533642244
>allow dads to have some "fun" with his daughter, at night in the bed and during bathing.

Abortion

Abortion is a hard problem because there are strong arguments for abortion and against abortion.

Arguments for abortion:

children who have genetic defects would have suffering if they are alive, they will be also a burden for the parents and society

it is evil to force woman to give a birth if she was raped, also she will become a single mother after this, which is bad

pregnancy and childbirth affects the female body, it is very taxing, what if a woman doesn't want to experience this?

if a child is not wanted, but woman is forced to give a birth, is she going to love the baby?

Arguments against abortion:

if abortion is allowed, this enables women to whore out, fuck with random men, because if she gets pregnant she can just murder the baby

murder. Abortion is a type of murder, because human life does not start after birth, it starts much earlier, during pregnancy, a child is developing over time, not during childbirth

if a woman doesn't want a baby, there are options, she can give the child to someone else rather than kill it

why should a woman decide if to abort the baby, when a baby also has a father, what about his opinion? What about the state, that should protect children, also the ones that aren't born yet?

So what to do, how to decide? I think that countries that fully ban abortion are wrong, and countries that fully legalizes abortion (abortion just because woman wants it) are also wrong. I think we need a compromise in this, abortion just because woman wants it should be illegal, but we should allow abortion in more justified cases, like if a child has genetic diseases or if a woman could die during childbirth. We might also allow abortion in case of rape, otherwise rape will be a valid strategy to pass your genes and also, if the rapist is unknown, then the child won't have father, it will be single mother with a child, which is bad.

>>533643028
>allow dads to have some "fun" with his daughter, at night in the bed and during bathing.
You like it or not?

LGBT & SJW

LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transsexual). There are people who claim that they are sexually attracted to same sex or both sexes, there are people that are male but they feel female or the opposite. Are they some kind of deviants? Maybe, I am not sure. But they are not evil just because they feel this way and they shouldn't be punished or killed for this. But should they be given some special rights like marriage? We could give that but we don't have to. It's not that important for the society.

But transsexuals, this is different. While I think of them the same, I do not think they are evil in any way, but the so called "gender change surgery" is a farce and extremely evil, the surgery is done by psychopaths also called (((doctors))). Transsexual people are their victims. The people that ever did this "surgery" to someone, they should receive strong punishment. Gender change surgery is physically impossible, males and females have different skeletons, brains, hormones, everything. But transsexuals should not be persecuted, but their (((doctors))) who harmed them should be persecuted.

There is also a thing "LGBT propaganda", (((they))) put LGBT into every movie and video game. This really lowers quality of the media, I am opposed to this propaganda. LGBT people can co-exist with straight people, but I don't want to have LGBT everywhere in front of my face. Enough.

SJW (Social Justice Warrior) religion was invented by the capitalists after the Occupy Wall Street movement. [CENSORED] invented and promoted this SJW movement to defeat Occupy Wall Street. They want to keep goys divided and fighting each other, rather than cooperate against capitalists.

Jewery has to be outlawed, like in Islam. That means that:

loans should be illegal or restricted, and only state bank would give them

housing loans could be allowed, if house ownership will be allowed

loans need to have low interest rate (if there will be any loans at all)

scamming will be outlawed

the sizes of products will be regulated by law, a package of rice will have to be 500g / 1000g / 2500g / 5000g. Capitalistic sizes like 900g, 450g, will be banned

the production of most or all products might be in the hands of the state

Should private companies be allowed? I see 3 options:

1. Not allowed, only state companies.

2. Only tiny companies or self employed small business allowed, while big things like car production, computer production, energy production will be in the hands of the state.

3. Allowed (in some sectors), but they have to submit to state, like in China, not that oligarchs/corporations control the state like in USA and Europe. And companies would be heavily regulated, and all jewery or worker exploitation, consumer scamming would be heavily punished.

Those 3 options have various pros/cons, the best option might depend on nation/race. The third option gives biggest potential for economic growth, but it gives less control to the state, there is a danger that owners of private companies will gain enough power to defeat the communist government.

If we had system 1 or 2, then instead of business owners you need state appointed managers. I think they should get their salary based on the results of the state company, how good it does. But we should focus on long term results, not short term (like capitalists do). Also, if the manager did break laws to achieve the results, he should lost part of his salary or he should get a harsh fine.

Ban goyphones. Goyphones (called "smartphones" by the capitalists) are horrible invention that makes people dumber and controlled. The capitalists use goyphones to brainwash goys, control them, record their conversations, make the goys even dumber.

Instead, we should have state produced mobile phone that will:

have calling and text messages (but it will be expensive to call and text)

have navigation and maps

won't have video games (you should play them on home consoles and PC)

probably won't have web browser

have ability to check public transport schedule, how to travel somewhere

The phone would be designed and produced by the state. It would be one or few models. The models would be replaced with new model rarely, every 5 years, and the old models would continue working and receive updates.

Depopulation. Do we need to depopulate, lower the amount of humans on Earth? We don't need, but we could. Agriculture on earth could easily support 10 billions of humans. But it will be better if we have less people than that.

Too many people = conflicts, wars, pollution. But if we make amount of humans too low, it might be harder to achieve big things like space exploration, colonization, science, philosophy etc., but, maybe we need to lower the population on Earth to about 5 billions of people. We should lower the population of the Negros. Not all of them but most. They don't use much resources but at same time there are no benefits from having them alive. We don't have Negro philosophers, scientists, inventors. They will never achieve anything. But some amount of Negros should be kept, in Africa, just as some kind of race and genetic diversity of humans on Earth.

[CENSORED].


Euthanasia. Not only Euthanasia should be legal, but there should be mandatory, forced euthanasia in some cases. Example would be if someone has Alzheimer Disease. Allowing people with Alzheimer to live and suffer, this is a violation of human rights, of people with Alzheimer and their caretakers. Allowing someone with this disease to live is immoral, it is moral to euthanize such person. There is a problem with euthanasia, that family or state could make pressure on old people to take euthanasia even if they don't want it. This is a real problem.

Suicide is related to euthanasia. People who do suicide should not be criticized or punished. But we should try to prevent people from doing suicide for impulsive reasons. But if someone wants suicide for years, we should allow him state euthanasia. Such people should be required to have some psychological and psychiatric consultation first.

File: 1753746993223.jpg (32 KB, 588x393)

32 KB JPG

>>533643863
Do these look like happy monkeys to you?

>>533646673
No.

Labor unions. Capitalists destroyed them. However, not everything about labor unions is great. One thing I hate in them is that they make barriers to enter the job for new people. This shouldn't be legal. Barriers to enter jobs should be as minimal as possible. A surgeon might need to study before getting the job, but in most jobs it shouldn't be required to study, shouldn't be required to have higher education.

Another problem in labor unions is that, some companies have them while some don't. The company that has them can be disadvantaged compared to the one that doesn't have labor union. Because of this I am thinking of a different system, where we don't have labor union per each workplace/company, but we have labor union dedicated to every sector of the economy / type of job.

We should also have a minimum wage set for every type of job.

This is based but very low IQ.

I have deep respect for based people who think for themselves and just lack the cognitive abilities to come up with something meaningful. But it is still what it is.

His opinions on many things are unintelligent, short sighted, or just wrong.

>human mafia
kek

On other things he has valid viewpoints. Like anyone who thinks for himself, he is still worth listening to and more interesting than NPC #8934658.

>>533648150
>This is based but very low IQ.
How low?
I have tested my IQ recently on two different high quality tests, and they both gave similar result, I am within few percent of the most intelligent people.
Maybe it looks low IQ due to the fact that English is my second language.

>His opinions on many things are unintelligent, short sighted, or just wrong.
Can you quote them and say why they are such?

Nepotism. Nepotism, also called "networking" by the capitalists, is a horrible thing that has huge negative effects on entire world. Nepotism is the opposite of meritocracy. People get employment, inheritance, money, power, not because of their skills, talent, work, but they get them because they had a luck to be born in specific family or they had luck to meet someone and know some person. All nepotism should be banned and punished with very high penalty.


Food. Unhealthy, processed food should be either banned, or it should be allowed for eugenics purposes (processed foods would contain chemicals that stop fertility). People should eat meals cooked at home by the wife, meals made from unprocessed healthy foods. However, restaurants can be legal, they are useful for people who need to eat something in the city, away from the home.

>>533640935
What is it with virgins and unicorns?

File: 1538516856455.jpg (205 KB, 500x604)

205 KB JPG

If unicorn were not extinct we'd be doing a lot better

>>533648753
I mean the manifesto, not you.

One example is his lack of understanding of scarcity and resources. Like when he says prisons should be luxurious, how does he know the society he proposes would be able to afford that? He's assuming they'd be rich, but he only ever experienced living in capitalism, which, according to him, is miserable.

>>533649870
>One example is his lack of understanding of scarcity and resources.
The scarcity right now is because oligarchs hoard everything and don't leave anything for us.
>Like when he says prisons should be luxurious, how does he know the society he proposes would be able to afford that?
We can afford luxury prisons, why not? The prisons are bad, for example in america, not because americans can't afford better ones but because they choose to have bad prisons, to punish and torture prisoners.
Luxury prisons are not that much expensive.
>He's assuming they'd be rich, but he only ever experienced living in capitalism, which, according to him, is miserable.
If we stop capitalism and tax the rich, we could afford many things.

>>533650400
the root cause of scarcity is not hoarding, goods need to be produced, with or without hoarding. so how does he know we'd have enough to spare and make prisons like that? and most importantly, why does he assume it without even questioning or explaining how? it just sounds like he is used to abundance while saying capitalism doesnt work

>We can afford luxury prisons, why not? The prisons are bad, for example in america, not because americans can't afford better ones but because they choose to have bad prisons, to punish and torture prisoners.
>Luxury prisons are not that much expensive.
he is suggesting a whole overhaul of society, including methods of production, how does he know we could afford them in the new system?

>>533642762
Jews did this. Jews invented communism and capitalism. Both systems do not work. I agree with most of your points but I prefer national socialism.

A big problem with capitalism is that when companies become bigger and bigger they just buy up or outcompete the rest. At the end, basicly where we are now, they are so powerful that all smaller companies go bankrupt and big companies like Asml or Unilever influence complete governments. Everybody works at the same big companies, everybody buys their stuff at the same companies, everything goes to shit. Endgame capitalism is like communism.

>>533650788
>goods need to be produced
We have robots/automation/AI/workers for this.
90% of what we produce goes to the oligarchs. They own 1000 houses per oligarch, private jets, cruise ships, islands (Epstein island).
>so how does he know we'd have enough to spare and make prisons like that?
Norway has luxury prisons, america is richer than Norway, could afford easily.

>he is suggesting a whole overhaul of society, including methods of production, how does he know we could afford them in the new system?
There would be more goods for poor people and general population, under his system, because there won't be oligarchs that hoard 90% of wealth.

>>533650828
>Jews did this. Jews invented communism and capitalism. Both systems do not work.
If they both don't work equally, then why was communist Russia so much better than capitalistic Russia?
>I agree with most of your points but I prefer national socialism.
What is national socialism about and how does it differ from communism?

>>533651350
Progressive taxes for companies could solve this. The bigger the company is the more taxes it should pay.

>Endgame capitalism is like communism.
Not communism but feudalism.

Taxes. We need to tax the rich and distribute to the poor, so the poor become more wealthy. But who is rich? We shouldn't have high income taxes. Income taxes are paid by the poor, not by the rich. We need to tax the wealth. And what is the wealth?

land

buildings

shares/ownership of companies, corporations

vehicles

bonds

free cash

Income taxes should be low so that poor and young people can earn money to buy wealth. After they have wealth, then we can tax them.

We could also have "sin tax" such as taxing unhealthy food, slop - assuming such things will even be legal.

Ecology & nature. I support ecology. But real ecology, not fake ecology like the global warming religion. Pollution is bad and we should lower it where possible, but we need factories, we need products, and they require some pollution. It is good to place factories far away from concentrated populations. We can also produce less low quality products, instead we can make quality things that last for decades, this is the real ecology.

Global warming and CO2. I am not saying global warming is fake, it seems real and humans do contribute to it, however nothing big will happen from increased CO2. Yes, some ice will melt and water levels will increase. And so what? We can migrate people living on such islands to other places. Using coal, natural gas, oil, there is nothing bad in this. But there are some issues:

safety/independence. Places like Europe have to import their oil. This is unsafe because what if some war or conflict will happen and countries will stop selling oil to Europe?

it took millions of years to produce gas/coal/oil, while we are consuming it at extreme speed, we can run out of it soon, we won't have those resources for future generations

funding regimes and wars. Natural resources like gas/coal/oil are mostly owned by various regimes, when you buy from them you fund them, they can then use the money in evil way including wars

Also, Europe is retarded about their CO2 religion, they are lowering their CO2 while other countries like India, China, America are increasing CO2 output, few times more than Europe is reducing.

>>533640935
I think vast majority of people would like that very much, too bad a few retards just has to ruin everything.

Schools. Schools are basically prisons and they torture children. I am not advocating to close all schools but we should improve them. Children should be allowed to choose what subjects they like and only learn those things. If someone is interested in something from early age, let him focus on that thing. We should also train people for manual jobs (trades) like construction, mechanics, we shouldn't try to make a science professor out of every child. Some people just don't have the genes for it.

Also, schools should be more fun, there should be more trips outside school building, teachers should show some experiments during classes, not just boring talk.


Tattoos. Another horrible thing in modern society. People with tattoos should be sterilized and they should work as prostitutes and prison guards. When you make a tattoo on yourself, you mark yourself as the beast, and as a goy.