>AI is bad because..........IT JUST IS, OKAY!?
SAAR I AM ARTIST CODER SAAR I CEO OF FUTURE SAAR
>>533641133There is a 0% chance this AI is ever but back in pandora's box. Even if all the world governments come together and make AGI punishable by death, this sort of AI or self-driving cars, etc. is going nowhere. How delusional are people thinking they can ban it when you can run stable diffusion locally.
>>533641133If you are dumb enough to believe software running on hardware is artificial intelligence you are too fucking stupid to talk about it.
>>533641133>maybe AI balances out your deficit uh, good?
>>533641329That’s because AI is literally just models on super fast computers you tard. It hasn’t been “in the box” for hundreds of years.
>>533641501>Maybe cars are a speedy solution if you aren't a fast person>Maybe calculators are a smart solution if you aren't a mathematical genius KEK
>>533641564>compares mental work to physical machines Hallmark of a midwit
>>533641511AI is just a buzzword that means software these days. Machine learning has been used in software for decades. "AI" is nothing new
>>533641671Are you saying no mental work should use technology no matter how complex?
>>533641133Uh yeah Im not a creative person. Thats why I gave up learning the guitar. I was just gonna play covers all day. Its why I chose rock band instead. Let someone else create and I'll just play with it.
>>533641564Yes.You’re just mad because I can now make my own ladyboy porn.
>>533641133but if youre writing "creative prompts" then just a write a fucking book. it seems creativity is limited only to visuals, which is probably an extension of our dumbed down low iq generational trajectory wherein all people are devoid of imagination.i dicked around with the early dalle-mini and that portraitAI site 4 or 5 years ago now. i quickly realized that regardless of my prompts, i had no idea what the fuck i was hoping or expecting to get. of the results generated i simply chose the one that "it" (the program) spat out that i thought captured the essence of my prompt or whatever image i had in my head, but then i realized that this image was useless to me and that i was basically starting a collection of false images that i was allowing me to myself were "mine". i generated a fair few, but i eventually deleted them all because of how empty and soulless the collection was.a creative solution to not being creative is ironically built into the solution, which is being creative. if you think youre not creative, do something: stand on the street and hum or whistle. doodle, collect fucking rocks and stack them. and what i just did there is basically what AI does. i generated ideas for you.
>>533642413I'm making fun of people AGAINST AI
>>533641872>not creative>plays coversdude all you had to do next is play the notes you learned from the covers outside the context of the song. play the G chord alone, dont play the G chord from a pop song, once you do that you quickly discover that it's the same G chord. once you realize that the G chord from your favorite cover is the same g chord you play by itself you now have a extracted a single note that can then be used to create a melody by playing ANOTHER note. please dont give up, thats hella gay if you do.
>>533641671>muh mental workUnironically a term coined by feminists. Thinking isn’t work it’s natural and doesn’t exhaust one at all. Only delusional women who believe they are performing "emotional labor" or some bs that they should be compensated for think like this.
>>533641133Provides little benefitUses insane amounts of electeicityDestroys undevelop3d areas with massive data centers.Fuck off kike. Kill yourself
>>533641673AI is a field of computer science that's been around for over half a century. It's weird that we used to use the term "AI" in the 90's to describe UT99 bots without issues, but now people are sperging out about it being used to describe LLMs
>>533643073>Provides little benefit>Uses insane amounts of electeicityAI can replace low level human work using far less resources. I use llama all the time to draft text for my job and stable diffusion to generate stock imagery and graphics instead of trawling through a subscription based library.
>>533641133Lol. I love reading the cope. I can produce all the waifu material I want now without depending on someone to make it. I can make the videos I want to watch, the songs I want to listen.Satanic artists are seething hard and I love it.
>>533644161Yea almost like the entire discourse is a NARRATIVE CREATED BY THE MEDIA TO EXTRACT VALUE FROM YOU, LIKE COVID, LIKE WOKE, LIKE 9/11, LIKE VIETNAM, LIKE KOREA, LIKE DESEGREGATIONLIKE EVERYTHING JEWS CONTROL NIGGER
>>533641133These are the same people that told coal miners that lost their jobs to technology to "lern2code"We should be telling these anti-AI artist faggots to do the same.
>>533641133As a creative good little goy very immersed in the tech, if you know what you’re doing it’s about as good as any artist and any writer and depending on how much face it’s showing by now sometimes “photos” are hard to tell as fake. Anyone who tells you otherwise doesn’t know what they are talking about.
>>533641133AI is kinda gay but>muh creativity =/= skills in every fieldJust tell us you’re a retarded artist that thinks everyone wants to use you, I wasn’t going to hire you for my own fun nothing-projects, ever. As if someone creative can’t benefit from a device you instruct to manifest things for you.. lmao fucking retarded statement outside of bigger more important fields
>>533644336To replace satan, we made supersatan.
>>533641133>Dispatch devs>Creativity Oh go fuck yourselves, uncreative characters, story and story lines, copied telltale games formula, youtuber VAs, barely passable character designs. These people have no right to use the word creativity
>>533642961so you're against calculators?
>>533641329>when you can run stable diffusion locallyWho's gonna tell him?
>>533641133i mean are they wrong? the only people I've met whi love their electronic jeet are either talentless midwits or soulless redditors. You know, the type that would buy a cybertruck
>>533641133Uncreative people shouldn't be creating because all they can "create" is derivative slop. Which is funny because that's quite literally all AI can "create".
I'm not afraid of AI because AI is largely useless to me beyond being a superior search engine. Even giving it a few half passed semi serious requests it gravely disappointed me. It would be better to just get an entry level office worker because you can at least train that into more complex tasks and be more useful later
>>533647659>all they can "create" is derivative slopAre we talking about uncreative people or the vast majority of artists who are complaining about AI? It generally isnt actually creative people complaining about AI. Its people who get paid to make digital art slop and those who wish to milk their previous work who haven't done anything relevent in years who complain about AI.If you hear someone complain about AI art, on some subconscious level they are comparing their own art to the AI art and believing it to be technically better then their own.
>>533647842An entry level office worker is $40k a year. A chatgpt sub is less then $500.
>>533647964For now, as these companies are losing how much money a year still?
>>533641311AI kills the jeet.
>>533641671>mental workWash your pussy, foid
>>533647930Bingo. It's ice merchants vs refrigerators all over again.
>>533641133AI is the creative equivalent of the printing press, taking power from the clergy and giving it to the masses. Art is meant to be an expression of a person's inner thoughts, the physical process was never part of it and is a hindrance. AI creation will always be human creation because no matter how little effort put into the creation side, the output is selected by the person.Artists don't create something unique, they amalgamate images same as AI. The Mona Lisa is a copy of a person. Its value is based on the emperor's new clothes.The argument becomes even more retarded because games are not supposed to be art. They could be incidentally but their purpose is to be a fucking game. The graphics are their to be utilitarian and create an environment. You have to have your head completely in your ass to argue about some background texture a player never even bothers to look at. Furthermore, independent games which are the only decent ones made now are greatly served by AI art instead of having the programmer with vision need to be Michelangelo mastering everything simultaneously so his vision isn't ruined by the input of 80 IQ artists.
This AI stuff is going to be used to steal every company secret and automation task process that the AI guys will probably use to sell, maybe they will even retroactively get owned by the AI companies later down the line with some bullshit law. Can you imagine being in China and buying an american company automation process sold by chatgpt under the table a few years from now? In the future you'll see AI business automation templates for consumer purchase.
>>533641133I mean it sounds cheesey but ultimately it is a resource distribution problem.Might be talking out of my ass but that is rather a problem for lawyers than creative people and the goyim i mean people usually dont like AI slop that much.
>>533641329A lot of what people are using it for is effectively punishable by death, unless you are a politician serving Israel.People being able to bypass jew media entirely is why there is so much vitriol spammed against it though. Imagine the day you never have to see another nigger in your shows or movies, and they actually have plots that go somewhere because they aren't dragging things out to fleece customers.
>>533642857Laws prohibiting copying rights killed music. Music is mathematical. It is trivial to copyright every possible song and that's where we are now. Music is only made by the corporations or it is painfully disharmonic.
>>533643073>spends 10 cents creating more works of art than the entire renaissanceNothing personnel. Learn to mow grass.
>>533641564Uhm... yes?That's the entire point of a machine.
>>533648016Sadly it doesn't, it'll let them catfish better since they can plug their Jeetastani garbage language into an AI and have it turn it into functional English
>>533646159Whats your talent? Or just another consumer with an opinion? You should try for american idol im sure youll win
>>533647659>>533647659 That is simply not true. I have been a professional artist for decades, and AI is a powerful tool for rendering. What matters is that you do not let AI become the storyteller. The story, the vision, and the soul must still come from you. Use AI to realize your original concepts, not replace them. Yes, plenty of untalented people will use it to produce slop. That is inevitable. But it is also irrelevant. Work made with genuine heart and artistic conviction will endure, while empty noise will fade, just as it always has in every medium.People said the same kind of things when YouTube emerged. They claimed it would drown professional film and video beneath a flood of low-quality user-generated content. In one sense, they were right because YouTube is full of slop. Most of it is really. And yet, despite that, it also gave rise to countless works that are moving, memorable, and undeniably art and kino. Nearly all of those works would never have existed if they had been forced through the old boomer gatekeeping systems of traditional film and video publishing.>>533648194Pretty much
>>533647930I'm talking about uncreative people. The major difference between anything "created" by AI and a human is that the person prompting does not need to understand any of the underlying fundamentals of art or writing. To steer away from "lol artists" (because way too much of the pro and anti AI argument is based on opinions people hold of amateur online fan artists) someone can prompt an AI to write a story without understanding what makes for good characters, conflict, or having any understanding of what makes a compelling narrative. The AI will write the story without understanding those things either, by simply pulling from existing sources and rearranging and re-phrasing them. A human author will have a clear idea in his mind of who his characters are, how they would act and where a story is going before he even types a single word on the page. AI doesn't think, and the prompter doesn't need to either. There is no human emotion, experience or knowledge going into the end product. It's a slop machine for slop consoomers.
>>533641133>creative solution if you aren't a creative personWhy are shitlibs so hellbent on trying to "fix" nonexistent problems by forcing square pegs into square holes?E.g., They did this with the whole STEM thing:>Shitlib: Oh no! There aren't enough women in STEM!>RWer: Because, biologically, women don't gravitate towards those certain fields.>Shitlib: But how can we motivate & get more women interested in STEM??It seems that at the root of leftism lies an unnatural compulsion to deconstruct functionality, like some pathologically intentional misalignment.
>>533649139Who cares. Dont watch it if it sucks. You act like Hollywood have a total understanding of storytelling and characters as well. They don't, look at what they've made or put their money behind the last 15 years.I've seen amazing artist use ai to bolster their vision to reality in ways that would have impossible before due to lack of budget. Ai is a force multiplier. A force multiplier for both talented people and idiots. Just stop watching trash. You act like ai has agency by itself and it's just producing media on its own like a self replicating virus. Who cares if morons use it to bring their moron untalented visions to life. If its shit, dont like it. If its good, its good.
>DispatchAh yes, another we wuz superheroes and shiet. Tired, exhausted even.
>>533641133Cocky fucks.Let's not kid ourselves here, most of the stuff is recycled or built upon archetypes etc.Add in a novel thing or two and that's it.
>>533641133it is true.you can use AI to make all sorts of things, you can have it help you do calculus, research a project but in the end if you use it as a crutch for your intelligence or creativity, you are not smart or creative yourself.its as if you were asked wats 2*2 and punched it into the calculator and started calling yourself genius.no, you're a fucking idiot/hack.
Ai is just a tool similar to a brush and paint or a camera. Libshit artists want to gate keep art behind an arbitrary wall
>>533641329Not all AI are equal.Diffusion / generative inferencing is not the same as an LLM which on a fundamental level is just a calculator trying to do 1+1 by guessing.All it can do is guess what the best corpo scripting for advertisements and financial reports will be, given the data from Q1/2/3/4.But an image generator can take the exact same data and paint pretty CGI graphs that impress simple people, without the data being misrepresented if the generator is well-trained, which by now most of them are.Video generation's the same. Forget multinationals abusing the technology at human expenses for a moment. A fishmonger can spend 10 hours in InDesign and Illustrator to brew up a new logo and boarding for his shop, or he generates a few ideas in a cold minute or two and picks the one he likes.The cost difference to his small business is monumental. To a large corporation the same difference is a dribble of piss in a bucket of vomit.The best way to view generative tech is as tools in your box.If the carpenter is atrocious at his job, the tool might cover his flaws or explicitly demonstrate them by virtue of a silly little prompt.It saves time. It doesn't preserve quality.Sound generation is a funny one.Musicians kvetch that AI is stealing their jobs, but is it?Recreating the sound from trained data costs so much performance to avoid raterot (whatever the crackling is called) that you might as well just generate a table from preset industry-wide composition routines and fettle with it to make it your own. Again, it takes a 10 hour job and makes it take 20 minutes.Will people pay for it? Fuck no. It's content, not art.But a true artist could cleverly use it to save critical time in his workflow, without compromising his intent.Just don't recreate sound. Save that for brutally oversized bimbo webms that sound as braindead as the characters are, where the infidelity fits.>damn that's a sound pun>so is that
>>533650404>The cost difference to his small business is monumental.Because he is not actually paying for it. He is being heavily subsidized by tax and investment.
>>533649769A real artist does not create in order to be called a genius or praised as talented. They create because they must create and because art is an act of expression, discovery, making their imagination become real, and not merely a performance for status. The people most threatened by AI are often not those devoted to creation itself, but those whose sense of artistic worth depends on exclusivity, prestige, and attention. To them, art becomes a zero-sum contest: if more people can make images, music, or stories, then their own cultural standing feels diminished. But the deeper fear is not that they will be prevented from making art. It is that they will no longer hold the same gatekept position over what is seen, valued, or celebrated. More human expression now exists than ever before(some of it great, most of it forgettable, but that has always been true.) The ego-driven artist does not fear the death of art. They fear the loss of status.Imagine if serious film photographers had responded to the arrival of digital consumer cameras and smartphones the same way. Imagine if they had declared that the democratization of image-making itself was a catastrophe against photographers, simply because more people could now participate. That would not have been a defense of art. It would have been a defense of hierarchy.
>>533649415You need both cause and effect. You're correctly identifying the effect. You're ignoring, or being dishonest, about the cause.The cause:- Male scientists secretly breaking or contaminating the female scientist's work- Male engineers forcing female engineers to give them a blowjob or get fired- Male physics professor incels failing a female physics students because she is female>inb4 "nice hypotheticals, librul"These examples have all been proven to have happened. Based on gender alone. Not "biological inclination to do science."So back to your point. You're right - there is a strong, maybe even jarring, push to introduce women to science. And in real life, you're right again, most women who take Intro to Chem never want to fucking see a periodic table again. But. There ARE smart, science-capable women who should be encouraged to pursue what they love. Loudly. So idiot dudes in Chewbacca t-shirts clearly understand this isn't 1950 anymore. To clarify, dumb girls who want to film themselves twerking beside a Bunsen burner should not enter serious science. I think that's your point. Most WOMEN SCIENTISTS would agree. But again, most of them truly do not have the IQ or natural desire, or both, to qualify into those fields. So you're mad for no reason.t. Environmental scientist. The female scientists at my job are all cool. I'm not a transgender or a female or etc. I just want a distinction to be made. I've worked in call centers and grocery stores around stupid females (and males). Scientists are a cut above. I think if you really open your eyes you'll see. The problem has always been, and continues to be, the ignorant. Of any gender. Of any race.
>>533648016>>533648904
>>533650699Anon, artists still have to eat. They have to pay rent. They have other bills. Saying that a "real artist" must create as an act of expression, et. al., maybe true, but unless they're paid for it, they can't live. Instead, they will be forced to get a job that will monopolize their time and take away from artistic pursuits.
>>533641133You only agree with this if you're based, redpilled, and hate kikes. So that means I agree.
Evil cannot create, it can only corrupt
>>533649478Okay, but if the media machinery is already in the hands of people who hire uncreative people to produce thoughtless slop, how much worse do you think AI is going to make that? Because I reckon they'd be only too happy not to have to pay any salaries and for things to get to the point where they can just type "write a blockbuster film script" and "generate this script in visual form" and pay the electric bill. What matters to me is that the human mind and human thoughts and understanding are behind art, written or visual. If humanity is going to stop producing art this way, or if no-one who is producing art this way can economically compete with globohomo corporations using AI to shit out product faster and cheaper, humanity may as well just cease to exist entirely. If people are creating things without understanding how (except that they make a profit) and consuming them without understanding why (other than make feel good) we'll have become little more than machines ourselves at that point. The human mind and its abilities is the valuable thing about us.
I don't care if "AI" exists but it needs to be quarantined away from the normal internet along with the poos and jews. Like sure it's a fun little novelty to play with occasionally but the brown hordes spamming and flooding every single site and space with it need to be put to death.
>>533649139But that's not what peoope are doing with Ai. Nobody is pressing a button and sitting sround while ai churns out slop. Maybe on deviantart or other websites where losers spend all day making shitty art . They are using it as a tool not a replacement for their own soul.
>>533650867If nobody wants to buy your arts that's not the consumers problem. The world is not a welfare program for people who dont want to learn real skills and instead go into something that's completely saturated
>>533650867Yes but that is a different issue than art. My point being this isnt about "art", its about status, value, and wealth. These so called "established artist" arent threatened by art itself, they feel threatened by loss of status, value, and power from the new competition.Economics is a totally different animal and aritst through the centuries have always found it challenging to make art and also eat. Theres been several models such as belonging to schools, being a patron, guilds, contracting ect. My prediction for the future is that if you want to be an artist, go analog. Learn to paint, sing, play acoustic, live dancing, sculpture ect. There will always be a demand for "live" human goods and performances even if robots can do the same thing.Recorded music has been around for 100 years. This was a huge shift in music artistry. For 10000s of years the only way one could hear music was if it was played live. So the record album automated the musician. Yet live music is doing fine. Because its not about the music or art itself, people want a human connection and that in itself has value and demand. Go analog. The digital world will be solely be for ai beings. The device between us and them and their domain(the ais) will get bigger not smaller.
>>533641133Their conflating skill with creativity, when i make music or games or whatever i use my skill combined with my creativity. If however you gave me an AI device with complete creative control that would not diminish my creativity at all? In short as a creative myself i can say with certainty that this is just cope for people who were never all that creative, but could gatekeep by their Skíll.
>>533651098Who cares. Stop watching trash. Im sure you watch things that you consider great which I would think is degenerate trash, and vis versa. I dont care what you like. If it moves you, it moves you. If it speaks to you, it speaks to you.If you saw something great that brought you to tears, but there was a 50% chance ai was used to make it, does that change your experience? What if you didnt know and couldn't tell?
>>533641133AI part now part of our lives just like smartphones it's your digital passport and tracker it's not mandatory it's not mandatory yet without it live it more difficult just paying your bills, taxes and other stuff with a credit card
>>533649139You can make all you want with no understanding but you are still going to be deciding if the output is good or not.If you do have basic understanding then you would have the AI create characters, have it create an outline, and iterate down to finer details. At every step you have the ability to modify things to your liking. It is an incredible tool and the people who can't see it are the soulless ones who are assigning value on what they can extract from others rather than what it can provide them.What is available to a home user is pretty limited, about 40,000 words max so you have to do things this way regardless unless continuity does not matter. Depending on circumstances it may not.
>>533650742>You're ignoring, or being dishonest, about the cause.>The cause:>drivel muh patriarchy...>But again, most of them truly do not have the IQ or natural desire, or both, to qualify into those fields.You mean majority of women don't have a genetic predisposition towards STEM fields? Yeah, thanks for literally repeating the "RWer's" rebuttal in my greentext example—which IS the "cause"—and thus proving my point. Correct! You are fucking retarded. Kek.
>>533649415The fewer workers available the more they have to be paid. They unironically believe people are equal.
>>533641133>art should be totally divorced from creativity and mass produced>conservative btw
>>533649769You see a lot of people like this guy where the result is meaningless, all they care about is some prestige of the creator.This is a particularly retarded viewpoint here where posts stand on their own merit and the person behind it is irrelevent. The idea people would create something for personal enjoyment is beyond their comprehension.
>>533641133AI makes uncreative subhumans stand out to be excluded for legal reasons. I love AI now!
Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind
>>533648016delusional migger spotted
>>533642413>>533642625smartest ai niggers
>>533651565>If you saw something great that brought you to tears, but there was a 50% chance ai was used to make it, does that change your experience? What if you didnt know and couldn't tell?Yes, because art is a way people communicate their ideas, thoughts and feelings and connect with each other on a human level. If there are none of those things behind a work and no connection between creator and audience because the creator is an AI, it becomes meaningless. AI has no ability to experience nor intent to convey any of those human thoughts.>>533651935>If you do have basic understanding then you would have the AI create characters, have it create an outlineBut why would anyone who actually is creative want an AI to do that for them instead of doing it themselves? If you're capable of doing those things, why would you need or want an AI (which cannot fully or accurately grasp or translate your ideas anyway) to do it for you? That's why I agree with the sentiment it's for uncreative people. There is no advantage to using it for anyone who is actually creative and capable, except to compete with other people who ARE using it to cut costs/time and at that point you're in a race to the bottom.
I'm so glad all these talentless theater kids are going to be replaced by AI. Maybe we'll actually get some good movies and games.
Kek
>>533653229>But why would anyone who actually is creative want an AI to do that for them instead of doing it themselves?Because it saves time and money you complete fucking dunce.
>>533654424Which is something I fucking mentioned if you had the attention span to read a couple more sentences. I can see why AI is for people like you.
>>533645992no one, since you CAN run stable diffusion locally, fucking techlet
>AI can do my job better, faster, and more efficient! We have to ban it otherwise I won’t have a jobLow iq
>>533653229>>533654424No, because writing a story to yourself spoils the ending. Again it is the difference in seeing art as something you do for yourself or to extract something from others.
>>533641671Not being able to understand the comparison between two things that aren't almost (if not exactly) the same thing is the hallmark of a fucking retard.
>>533641133Unlike Hollywood movies, AI loves to lie and taking extreme measures. We are training AI to kill now. It's just a matter of time until terrorists start using it. AI is going to make men more lonely then ever, and some of them just want to see the world burn.
>>533653229>If there are none of those things behind a work and no connection between creator and audience because the creator is an AI, it becomes meaningless.Nature photography is art, isn’t it? The fact that the photographer did not create the rocks, their texture, or their arrangement does not make the resulting image meaningless. What matters is not whether the raw material was handmade by a person, but whether meaning is perceived, framed, and expressed through it. Art is not merely an object. An object without interpretation is just matter. It becomes art when it is encountered, shaped, and invested with meaning.So your argument fails at the foundation. You are essentially claiming that nothing can be moving, meaningful, or artistically valid unless a human being physically made the source material. That is obviously false. Human beings have always been inspired by nature, chance, found forms, and things they did not personally create. I have been inspired by AI-generated images in exactly that way. You do not get to dictate what can or cannot move me, or what I am permitted to find meaning in.People who make arguments like yours have been proven wrong over and over again history and will be proven wrong over and over again in the future. Thats why I make a living as a successful artist for decsdes and you do not and can not.
>>533645092>As if someone creative can’t benefit from a device you instruct to manifest things for you.This is a very succinct way of phrasing it, yes.Also, the fact that the "AI" requires endless tard-wrangling and do-overs that can take hours or days before you get what you actually want is a fact these people (or "people") always overlook, somehow. They pretend you just hit a button and two seconds later you're done. Pfft. I wish.
>>533651136AI is another 'great equalizer'. It floods the spaces of talent with untalented retards that make everything worse.Retards here celebrating the DEI of creative world.
>>533641133>being creative means being able to accurately draw thingsNo
>>533641671>midwitI haven’t seen a single intelligent poster use this term, ever.
>>533655636Who cares. Are you the art Karen?
in few years it will be revealed that all these studios claiming to be AI-free used AI, but nobody will care at that point because it's used everywhere it's like companies waving rainbow flags or posting #blmit's all PR, it's all bullshit
>>533655636DEI has nothing to do with the concept you described.
>>533653229Are you a creative? Asking seriously, so that I can understand, with no ulterior motive or agenda. I'm a creative, and the editing process is a lot of fun. You're basically asking "why would you want to be given a clay sculpture that you could reshape anyway you want?" Uhh because it's fun?? Nothing is set into stone and the editor of an AI's creation has all the control in the world over how it ends up looking. That can be a ton of fun. Sure, starting from absolute scratch and doing every single detail of the creation process yourself is also fun, but they're different experiences that don't really compete with each other. You may as well ask why a five star chef would ever want to eat a meal cooked for him by his wife. Both options have value.
>>533655794>but how does this personally affect youIt's another drop in the ocean of 'everything is getting worse'. It just sucks.>>533655871It's the same thing.Whether it's a nigger pilot who got educated/hired due to quotas or an artist that can't draw without his prompt engineering machine. Retards in places where they don't belong making everything worse.
>>53365584720 years ago studios were proud that they used cutting edge vfx and routinely showed behind the scenes footage of their vfx sweatshops. As "CGI" got a bad meme reputation, studios just started hiding it away all together thinking the public will judge the movies harsher. I've always found the technical process fascinating but plebians have to be moralistic about everything.
>>533656183I think it'll take some time for AI to be used positively, right now it's just straight up slop. Most people use it because they can't actually make whatever it is they're telling the AI to do. No refinement.
>>533656161You just have bad filtering and let yourself watch shit.
>>533641133>resist technological advancement to own the chudssounds good to me. keep lefties far away from this technology for as long as possible
>>533656389Thats not ais fault. If people have shit visions, then what they create will be shit. Woke Hollywood spent billions making trash.
>>533641133AI is like fast food: disgusting slop that is lapped up by fat tasteless retards addicting to consuming.
>>533645992Tell him what?You need to be told that there's a whole world of locally runnable models you and the majority of people are missing out on. You have AI websites popping up everywhere because you can run most of this shit locally.Some of the big players are ponzi schemes, and this whole ordeal will follow the footsteps of the dotcom boom.
>>533641133>ask ai for solutions and to converse about things you continuously pounder about , because nobody else wants to hear about your autistic rants and fixationsI dont see anything wrong with ai, other than jeets using it for everything.The devs are the type of niggers that cant see the apple when they close theyre eyes
>>533650404>The cost difference to his small business is monumentalBecause the service he is using is ran at a equally monumental loss.
Dispatch devs fixin' to be out of a job soon.
>>533656108Chef analogy is more like why isn't he farming his own produce and blacksmithing his own pots.
>>533656183No company is going to show some bangladeshi sweatshop making their $500,000,000 product. People actually do give a shit about that unlike AI use.
>>533656108Writer, not artist, which is why I mainly used writing in my examples. It would be retarded of me to form an opinion on AI without experiencing it, so I have played around with it to an extent. That experience tells me that it cannot mimic the human creative process. If I ask AI to write something, it would not write in my voice. Even if I fed an AI character profiles and setting information, it would still not write the same things I would have written, or convey my ideas from my imagination in the same way. I imagine the same is true of image generation (which again I have experimented with, but I'm not an artist). It's not going to produce the same image someone had in their mind.What I'm really trying to get across is that AI doesn't create what a person would have created if they had the time and skill, it creates something different based on whatever training data it has. The human voice/imagination/soul (whatever you want to call it) and how an individual person translates that into language or images is not present. Personally I would have no desire to edit material produced by AI into something workable, because it's so far removed from my own vision that it would be more frustrating and time consuming than to just to do it from scratch myself.
>>533645992I made this on my little low-to-mid-grade consumer graphics card that I use for and is made for bibeo games. 100% locally hosted, run, and generated.https://files.catbox.moe/gd9ijj.mp4Get with the times, boomer.
>>533648016more like AI makes the sly ones more powerful
>>533648186>Bingo. It's ice merchants vs refrigerators all over again.
>>533657808Kudos for investing the time in an informed take. You tried it, you like working without it, and you're willing to accept the consequences. based.What gets me is the midwits who try telling everyone else what tools they can or can't use. Since when are you the boss of me?
>>533645558>says the most creatively degenerated person in this threadTovariš, ni ti pomoči.
>>533641133>le computer can't do le magical art stuff!
i used ai for the first time todayhad it turn an image of data into a spreadsheet, that was pretty cool
>>533641311Please do the needful and pay me for my slop!
>>533657776The problem with the west is its constant purtian moralization of everything. Everything has to fall on a GOOD or BAD line. Than is wants to export its current moral panic to the rest of the world and tell everyone else what to think or what they can or cant do. You see this with every current thing they fixate on. We see this at rhe individual level with its citizens. They are either "Ai GOOD" or "Ai BAD!". Nothing in-between or just a realistic outlook of seeing it as a neutral tool with pros or cons. People here get so emotional about it.
>>533641133Oh god another ugly female journo. Please rape and kill it.
>>533641133AI should be used to eliminate mundane and rote work, like factory production, warehouse management, data entry, etc. Instead it’s being used to try and push people out of work they do for passion’s sake
>>533664110Anon, being an artist was always a niche occupation and the majority of big artists were poor as fuck during their life time.Rich artist is a modern thing, especially that many rich artist, such as musicians, singer, and actors, this is a 1900-2000+ thing.AI will bring back the norm about artists, the real one, the true artist, will be rare, niche, and poor.All these "artists" we have today that complain about AI are talentless women and trannies anyway, fuck them.
>>533641395>software running on hardware>humans
>>533641671>doesn't understand that mental work is physical
>>533664648As someone heavily involved in creative work for the purpose of self fulfillment and making something other people can enjoy, I personally do not use AI. I think it can be a tool to aid in that, but I personally would rather do everything by hand.
>>533666586I dunno i want to use it for titcows.
