Consciousness is a result of physical phenomena, some atomic/subatomic particles in the brain produce it. It is a feature of the universe, of physics. We are inside one universe, one physics, therefore there is a single receiver of consciousness. Single actor that experiences it. But the experiences are separated because there is no memory shared between two people. We have separate brain and memory, that's why there is an illusion of many humans, people. But it is an illusion. When you have stomach ache, but then some other person has it too, the result is the same. You think your one (stomach ache) is more important or even that only you have consciousness, but in the universe there is only one consciousness receiver. We are just atoms formed in specific combinations and the brain allows to experience consciousness.This theory and phenomena extends to animals, including the ones that are eaten alive in the jungle or raised for meat in cages. It even extends to aliens on another planets, as long as they evolved similar mechanism. They could evolve different consciousness though, or no consciousness at all.It is not enough to avoid your own suffering, we have to avoid suffering of all living, conscious beings. All animals (including humans).If you make some harm to animal or human, it is the same as if you did that to yourself, you will feel this pain, just in another "dimension", another timeframe.In some way, there is a single "person" in the universe, the single receiver of consciousness, he is alone in the universe. Multiple, separate people and animals are just an illusion, delusion. They are illusion as a side effect of people's memory being separated into each brain and inaccessible by others.1/2https://singleconsciousness.neocities.org/
2/2When rich and powerful people conspire against the poor, they conspire against themselves, they make suffering to their own, to the single consciousness receiver.However, the theory seems to be compatible with depopulation, sterilization of people. With less people on Earth, the quality of life could be much better.Not all animals and humans have the same level of self-consciousness. The level might be correlated to the level in Positive Disintegration model (by Kazimierz Dąbrowski).
>>533642331no cunt. there is nothing conscious in the material universe. Matter is effect of cause. Matter is an effect of consciousness. The entirety of the material universe including your brain is merely wave motion simulating imagination. The aboriginals were right, its all a dream & dreams are real.
>>533642331If this is true, we need to exterminate the Indians as soon as possible. Imagine having to experience being Indian. Utterly terrifying.
>>533642331Kek, im still going to beat my dog for digging holes
>>533642761Evidence?>>533642872Now imagine being a pig raised for meat in cages, then slaughtered.
>>533642331>Consciousness is a result of physical phenomenaOther way around. Stopped reading there. Stupid polack
>>533643397> Now imagine being a pig I would rather live a million lives as a pig than one as an Indian
>>533643475Evidence?
If you harm other beings, for example animals, you harm yourself.
>>533642761>no cunt. there is nothing conscious in the material universeThis>>533642331Hylic satan worshiper souless npc. Go live* for ukraine
>>533644328They provided as much evidence as you did.
>>533642331Look up Advaita Vedanta, it is a more consistent explanation of the same type of idea.https://realization.org/p/ashtavakra-gita/richards.ashtavakra-gita/richards.ashtavakra-gita.html
>>533645121>Its core tenet is that jivatman, the individual experiencing self, is ultimately pure awareness mistakenly identified with the body and its senses[2] and with thought-constructs,[3] and non-different from Ātman/Brahman or sat, the highest Self or Real.[4][5][6][note 1] The term Advaita (अद्वैत) literally means "not-two"[7][8] or "one without a second,"[8] which means that only Brahman, 'the one', is ultimately real while prapanca, 'the second', 'the world' or the multiplicity of thought-constructs, is not fully real.[9] It is commonly rendered as "nonduality,"[10][11] and popularly interpreted as meaning that Atman is non-different from Brahman, and often equated with monism.Yes, maybe it's the same theory. I will read more of it.
>>533645121Also Monism is similar to this theory.
>>533642331Pixels do not create the player, they frame the directly controlled unit and environmental effects. You're thinking backwards!
>>533642331>Consciousness is a result of physical phenomenait's the other way round
>>533642331At least your heart is in the right place.
>>533642331>My consciousness: real>Your consciousness: fake and simulated
>>533646401>>533643475Other way around doesn't make sense. There is 7 billions humans on Earth. So are you saying each of this 7 billion humans have each own physical universe with physics? What is the point of this?I am saying there is a single physics and multiple humans. Physics in the universe produce consciousness.
>>533646697>Physics in the universe produce consciousnessnouniverse is the product of underlying consciousness
>>533646697People have been asking this question forever and there isn’t an answer. If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it, does it make sound?
>>533647226>People have been asking this question forever and there isn’t an answer. If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it, does it make sound?Of course it makes a sound. The physics work without humans. In the past, humans didn't even exist but physics worked.When a tree falls in the woods it compresses particles in the air and it causes sound.
>>533646581>My consciousness: real>Your consciousness: fake and simulatedYou didn't read the theory correctly.My consciousness is your consciousness, your consciousness is my consciousness, there is only a single receiver of consciousness.So I am not "better" or the only real person.But there is only one receiver, one "person" in the universe, and it lives the life of every human and animal in the universe.
>>533647965So you are saying if all consciousness was extinguished the universe would still exist?
>>533642872>>533643744Dangerously based
>>533648672>So you are saying if all consciousness was extinguished the universe would still exist?Yes. Why wouldn't it exist?I believe we have many universes with different physics and it's possible that over 99% of them are without any consciousness. But they still have physics and something happens inside them.
yes and no
This theory is compatible with having sex with children, as long as you are nice and the child likes it.
>>533647218>universe is the product of underlying consciousnessSingle consciousness? Or consciousness of every human/animal? Because there is 7 billion humans and even more animals.
>>533650492Kys
>>533644957>Hylic satan worshiper souless npc. Go live* for ukraine?
>>533648625It's pretty hard to define primordial creation anon.I think all consciousness comes from the same source and returns to the same source. But is consciousness at all times in the interconnected form? It seems like it can be detached from the 'over-consciousness' for periods of time. So even though I am aware that my consciousness is of the same substance and make as yours, it is locally speaking different in some way.Theory;I think that consciousness is permanent and full of creative potential, and physical life is an expression of creative potential. So whilst physical life doesn't share the vastness and greatness of creative power as does 'primordial thought', it is nevertheless made of this primordial thought.Kind of like if you have an infinite power, let's call that primordial thought, the creationary force, you can still pull finite beings and experienced out of that original infinity without ever harming or changing it. Like you can remove and reattach 1's and 2's out of an infinite number infinitely.So we are these finite sparks of 'primordial thought', the superconsciousness, finites in an infinity. Whilst our local configuration will undoubtedly perish, finite as it is, the element that makes us truly ourselves, consciousness, will not. Only the 'theoretical' boundaries will fade when we die. And we'll be unbound infinity again.And maybe then we are born again as 'local finite parts of an infinity'. So life doesn't need to be physical, it can simply be a product of unlimited potential and infinite permanence of being.
>>533646357>Pixels do not create the player, they frame the directly controlled unit and environmental effects. You're thinking backwards!Consciousness cannot control physics, atoms, move things.
Do you agree with the theory?
>>533653527Yes
This is so gay
>>533657034Why?
Rate/comment the theory.
>>533642331Study logic. It will change your life.
>>533654408>replying to yourself to agree with the opinion you posted yourself
>>533659552>replying to yourself to agree with the opinion you posted yourselfBased.
>>533642331WRONGphysical reality is a result of consciousness phenomena.
>>533642331hylic
>>533642331Bolanda poster branching into new topics? GOod shit.
>>533642541>>533642331Blah blah blah word salad. EVERYBODY DIES.
>>533660337>WRONG>physical reality is a result of consciousness phenomena.Why do you think so? It doesn't make any sense.There is 7 billion humans on Earth. You think all of them have unique physical universes?
>>533660741Is this real quote? Source?
