Consciousness is a result of physical phenomena, some atomic/subatomic particles in the brain produce it. It is a feature of the universe, of physics. We are inside one universe, one physics, therefore there is a single receiver of consciousness. Single actor that experiences it. But the experiences are separated because there is no memory shared between two people. We have separate brain and memory, that's why there is an illusion of many humans, people. But it is an illusion. When you have stomach ache, but then some other person has it too, the result is the same. You think your one (stomach ache) is more important or even that only you have consciousness, but in the universe there is only one consciousness receiver. We are just atoms formed in specific combinations and the brain allows to experience consciousness.This theory and phenomena extends to animals, including the ones that are eaten alive in the jungle or raised for meat in cages. It even extends to aliens on another planets, as long as they evolved similar mechanism. They could evolve different consciousness though, or no consciousness at all.It is not enough to avoid your own suffering, we have to avoid suffering of all living, conscious beings. All animals (including humans).If you make some harm to animal or human, it is the same as if you did that to yourself, you will feel this pain, just in another "dimension", another timeframe.In some way, there is a single "person" in the universe, the single receiver of consciousness, he is alone in the universe. Multiple, separate people and animals are just an illusion, delusion. They are illusion as a side effect of people's memory being separated into each brain and inaccessible by others.1/2https://singleconsciousness.neocities.org/
2/2When rich and powerful people conspire against the poor, they conspire against themselves, they make suffering to their own, to the single consciousness receiver.However, the theory seems to be compatible with depopulation, sterilization of people. With less people on Earth, the quality of life could be much better.Not all animals and humans have the same level of self-consciousness. The level might be correlated to the level in Positive Disintegration model (by Kazimierz Dąbrowski).
>>533642331no cunt. there is nothing conscious in the material universe. Matter is effect of cause. Matter is an effect of consciousness. The entirety of the material universe including your brain is merely wave motion simulating imagination. The aboriginals were right, its all a dream & dreams are real.
>>533642331If this is true, we need to exterminate the Indians as soon as possible. Imagine having to experience being Indian. Utterly terrifying.
>>533642331Kek, im still going to beat my dog for digging holes
>>533642761Evidence?>>533642872Now imagine being a pig raised for meat in cages, then slaughtered.
>>533642331>Consciousness is a result of physical phenomenaOther way around. Stopped reading there. Stupid polack
>>533643397> Now imagine being a pig I would rather live a million lives as a pig than one as an Indian
>>533643475Evidence?
If you harm other beings, for example animals, you harm yourself.
>>533642761>no cunt. there is nothing conscious in the material universeThis>>533642331Hylic satan worshiper souless npc. Go live* for ukraine
>>533644328They provided as much evidence as you did.
>>533642331Look up Advaita Vedanta, it is a more consistent explanation of the same type of idea.https://realization.org/p/ashtavakra-gita/richards.ashtavakra-gita/richards.ashtavakra-gita.html
>>533645121>Its core tenet is that jivatman, the individual experiencing self, is ultimately pure awareness mistakenly identified with the body and its senses[2] and with thought-constructs,[3] and non-different from Ātman/Brahman or sat, the highest Self or Real.[4][5][6][note 1] The term Advaita (अद्वैत) literally means "not-two"[7][8] or "one without a second,"[8] which means that only Brahman, 'the one', is ultimately real while prapanca, 'the second', 'the world' or the multiplicity of thought-constructs, is not fully real.[9] It is commonly rendered as "nonduality,"[10][11] and popularly interpreted as meaning that Atman is non-different from Brahman, and often equated with monism.Yes, maybe it's the same theory. I will read more of it.
>>533645121Also Monism is similar to this theory.
>>533642331Pixels do not create the player, they frame the directly controlled unit and environmental effects. You're thinking backwards!
>>533642331>Consciousness is a result of physical phenomenait's the other way round
>>533642331At least your heart is in the right place.
>>533642331>My consciousness: real>Your consciousness: fake and simulated
>>533646401>>533643475Other way around doesn't make sense. There is 7 billions humans on Earth. So are you saying each of this 7 billion humans have each own physical universe with physics? What is the point of this?I am saying there is a single physics and multiple humans. Physics in the universe produce consciousness.
>>533646697>Physics in the universe produce consciousnessnouniverse is the product of underlying consciousness
>>533646697People have been asking this question forever and there isn’t an answer. If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it, does it make sound?
>>533647226>People have been asking this question forever and there isn’t an answer. If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it, does it make sound?Of course it makes a sound. The physics work without humans. In the past, humans didn't even exist but physics worked.When a tree falls in the woods it compresses particles in the air and it causes sound.
>>533646581>My consciousness: real>Your consciousness: fake and simulatedYou didn't read the theory correctly.My consciousness is your consciousness, your consciousness is my consciousness, there is only a single receiver of consciousness.So I am not "better" or the only real person.But there is only one receiver, one "person" in the universe, and it lives the life of every human and animal in the universe.
>>533647965So you are saying if all consciousness was extinguished the universe would still exist?
>>533642872>>533643744Dangerously based
>>533648672>So you are saying if all consciousness was extinguished the universe would still exist?Yes. Why wouldn't it exist?I believe we have many universes with different physics and it's possible that over 99% of them are without any consciousness. But they still have physics and something happens inside them.
yes and no
This theory is compatible with having sex with children, as long as you are nice and the child likes it.
>>533647218>universe is the product of underlying consciousnessSingle consciousness? Or consciousness of every human/animal? Because there is 7 billion humans and even more animals.
>>533650492Kys
>>533644957>Hylic satan worshiper souless npc. Go live* for ukraine?
>>533648625It's pretty hard to define primordial creation anon.I think all consciousness comes from the same source and returns to the same source. But is consciousness at all times in the interconnected form? It seems like it can be detached from the 'over-consciousness' for periods of time. So even though I am aware that my consciousness is of the same substance and make as yours, it is locally speaking different in some way.Theory;I think that consciousness is permanent and full of creative potential, and physical life is an expression of creative potential. So whilst physical life doesn't share the vastness and greatness of creative power as does 'primordial thought', it is nevertheless made of this primordial thought.Kind of like if you have an infinite power, let's call that primordial thought, the creationary force, you can still pull finite beings and experienced out of that original infinity without ever harming or changing it. Like you can remove and reattach 1's and 2's out of an infinite number infinitely.So we are these finite sparks of 'primordial thought', the superconsciousness, finites in an infinity. Whilst our local configuration will undoubtedly perish, finite as it is, the element that makes us truly ourselves, consciousness, will not. Only the 'theoretical' boundaries will fade when we die. And we'll be unbound infinity again.And maybe then we are born again as 'local finite parts of an infinity'. So life doesn't need to be physical, it can simply be a product of unlimited potential and infinite permanence of being.
>>533646357>Pixels do not create the player, they frame the directly controlled unit and environmental effects. You're thinking backwards!Consciousness cannot control physics, atoms, move things.
Do you agree with the theory?
>>533653527Yes
This is so gay
>>533657034Why?
Rate/comment the theory.
>>533642331Study logic. It will change your life.
>>533654408>replying to yourself to agree with the opinion you posted yourself
>>533659552>replying to yourself to agree with the opinion you posted yourselfBased.
>>533642331WRONGphysical reality is a result of consciousness phenomena.
>>533642331hylic
>>533642331Bolanda poster branching into new topics? GOod shit.
>>533642541>>533642331Blah blah blah word salad. EVERYBODY DIES.
>>533660337>WRONG>physical reality is a result of consciousness phenomena.Why do you think so? It doesn't make any sense.There is 7 billion humans on Earth. You think all of them have unique physical universes?
>>533660741Is this real quote? Source?
>>533661164if you believe physical reality is the base of the universe then you can never explain consciousness. thats why computers dont have consciousness like "biological computers" do. its the opposite. consciousness is the base and physical reality is derived from it.
>>533642331that's why we need to nuke all other living beings and we can be the only one experiencing consciousness
there can only be one person on this planet
>>533661619https://sacred-texts.com/eso/kyb/index.htm "The Universe is Mental--held in the Mind of THE ALL."--The Kybalion.THE ALL is SPIRIT! But what is Spirit? This question cannot be answered, for the reason that its definition is practically that of THE ALL, which cannot be explained or defined. Spirit is simply a name that men give to the highest conception of Infinite Living Mind--it means "the Real Essence"--it means Living Mind, as much superior to Life and Mind as we know them, as the latter are superior to mechanical Energy and Matter. Spirit transcends our understanding, and we use the term merely that we may think or speak of THE ALL. For the purposes of thought and understanding, we are justified in thinking of Spirit as Infinite Living Mind, at the same time acknowledging that we cannot fully understand it. We must either do this or stop thinking of the matter at all.Let us now proceed to a consideration of the nature of the Universe, as a whole and in its parts. What is the Universe? We have seen that there can be nothing outside of THE ALL. Then is the Universe THE ALL? No, this cannot be, because the Universe seems to be made up of MANY, and is constantly changing, and in other ways it does not measure up to the ideas that we are compelled to accept regarding THE ALL, as stated in our last lesson. Then if the Universe be not THE ALL, then it must be Nothing--such is the inevitable conclusion of the mind at first thought. But this will not satisfy the question, for we are sensible of the existence of the Universe. Then if the Universe is neither THE ALL, nor Nothing, what Can it be? Let us examine this question.>https://sacred-texts.com/eso/kyb/kyb07.htm
>>533660745EVERYBODY BORES.
>>533661708>if you believe physical reality is the base of the universe then you can never explain consciousness.Why not?>thats why computers dont have consciousness like "biological computers" do.The computers don't have it because they are built with silicon. If we built computers with atoms like atoms in brain then they could have consciousness.>its the opposite. consciousness is the base and physical reality is derived from it.There is 7 billion humans. Do you think there is 7 billion realities? Why? Why all of them have the same physics?
>>533642331Consciousness is not a feature of the universe. The universe is a feature of consciousness.
>>533661876>there can only be one person on this planetIf you are alone, how are you going to have a sex with a lolita? You need at least two people.
>>533642331>Consciousness is a result of physical phenomenayes of logic gates (a network of neurons can emulate logic gates, and a network of logic gates can emulate a neuron.) and electric currents that create magnetic fields.literally every function in your body is controlled by electric current and electromagnetic forces are the reason anything life and galaxies included exists at all.>some atomic/subatomic particles in the brain produce it.the flow of current through these neurons produces consciousness>It is a feature of the universe, of physics.yes>If you make some harm to animal or human, it is the same as if you did that to yourselfnot really since you will never see it through their point of view.>In some way, there is a single "person" in the universethe universe just recycles energy into a new dissipative structure aka life, then you die again and it recycles energy again. its a never ending cycle of a never ending universe that keeps stacking more and more complexity over time creating more life. (time is a secondary measurement of motion and motion is created through the flow of electric current).
>>533663206>Consciousness is not a feature of the universe. Wrong.>The universe is a feature of consciousness.Wrong.
>>533664173What evidence do you have of the universe which is not based upon consciousness?
>>5336642571. The fact that physics in all humans work the same way, same physic laws.2. There is 7 billion humans and even more animals. So there would be 7+ billion universes if there is so many consciousnesses.
>>5336649881. This is based upon consciousness. It is a conscious observation.2. The evidence for the existence of other consciousnesses is itself predicated upon your immediate conscious experience.Any observation of the physical world comes after consciousness. Therefore, following Occam's razor, consciousness is fundamental, and not the observations. You are following the principle of not multiplying entities beyond what's necessary when you state that all consciousness must be singular, but you arbitrarily leave it behind when you identify what that monism actually is.
>>533665415>Any observation of the physical world comes after consciousness. Therefore, following Occam's razor, consciousness is fundamental, and not the observations.Following Occam's razor, consciousness is a result of physics. Because if take your approach, then there must be 7 billion universes with almost the same physics, because there is 7 billion conscious beings (actually more when we include animals).
>>533666301You yourself say that consciousness is singular, and in my post I explicitly agreed with you in that because I knew that you'd otherwise make this argument. It seems like you didn't understand my response.
>>533666495>You yourself say that consciousness is singular, and in my post I explicitly agreed with you in that because I knew that you'd otherwise make this argument. It seems like you didn't understand my response.ok then. So what is your claim versus my theory? If you agree that consciousness is singular, then yes, physics could as well be result of the consciousness. But I still feel like there are universes that do not have consciousnesses, they are like philosophical zombies, like our computers, they calculate physics but nothing experiences them.
