you WILL eat the bug
>>533663896Where do you work, anon? I'll put it on my places to avoid list.
>>533663896Why should the cockroaches have pathogens?Is there something they are not telling us?
>>533663896Doin yer foodsafe bud?
>>533663974this is part of the foodsafe program you (dont really need but for some stupid fucking I do) need to complete before they let you work at restaurants and whatnot
>>533664133yes
>>533663896Modern Western humans eat smashed bugs all the time. Many modern processed food items contain shellac - which is made directly from crushed insects.
>>533663896How would that be categorized as a physical hazard? Is the dirty roach made of jagged metal?Also, the answer is written by the same retarded asshole who writes online safety training courses for my company. The "provided that" qualifier is nowhere in the question. If you just make up whatever shit you want, everything is debunked.
>>533664343and that's a good thing!
some HR retard came up with this no doubt. the answer is actually C.
>>533664222Thanks, anon. I'll add restaurants to my do not visit list.
>>533664343not for protein my man
>>533663896doing your foodsafe anon?
>>533664498hey, i dont make the rules, bud
>>533664343shut the fuck up jeetI'll slap your stupid fucking bobblehead clean off
>>533664567Good policy.
>>533664222it's common sense, but there's a lot of retards out there who need things spelled out for them.
Stop eating at restaurants and carefully reconsider anything you buy at the store.
the roach couldve ate or contacted chemicals, and the roach body itself remains a physical hazard too. this question sucks
>>533663896well how am i supposed to know the cockroach was cooked at all let alone to 74 degrees. a whole cockroach on top of rice isn't actually a dish people eat, i've never seen anyone eat that. the obvious assumption would be that the cockroach isn't supposed to be there. additionally the question presupposes there is a hazard by asking 'what kind of hazard is this' rather than 'what kind of hazard, if any, is this'. the answer is c due to the pathogens that cockroaches can have (if not cooked to 74 degrees)
>>533664759Yeah, I can't believe bigots thing a dead cockroach in food is some kind of hazard. Ick (them, not the scrumptious roach)
>>533663896Not viable as a consumer product. It's hard to produce in large quantities and hard to sell to people.There is also the fact that established meat producers, like beef and chicken farmers will eat alive anyone trying to undermine their business.No, I don't think that JEWISH UBERMENSCHEN can push enough propaganda through media to sway public opinion enough to normalize consumption of such a product as a everyday meal
>>533664269Well have fun in food industry it fucking sucks>t. wasted 15 years of my life cooking
>>533664222It's incorrect anyway, the dead roach presents a chemical hazard because the restaurant sprays quarterly and it just tracked a healthy dose of pesticide into the meal. Also did they stick a meat thermometer in the roach to ensure internal temp was enough?
>>533664671damn that's retarded, where is that from?
>>533665848also there's some research showing that a diet high in chitin is carcinogenic, not that anyone cares
>>533666003yeah all I really know about restaurants is two seasons of the sopranos so I'm not really looking forward to it. i do have other things in mind anyway>>533666540lol
>>533665175I'd bet the question was written by a woman.
this thread has good arguments for why its a physical and chemical hazard as well and not just biological
>>533666853it's a decent enough mcjob just don't make a career out of it plus its pretty easy to fuck servers if you aren't too much of a sperg
>>533666888it would explain the mind reading component that you're supposed to just know the roach was supposed to be there and that its cooked to 74 degrees, despite no indication of that.
>>533664671>insects are a physical hazard>unless cooked properly
>>533664498The distinction doesn't even matter. Roach in product=throw product away. The fact that there's a question making the distinction implies a different course of action depending on whether or not the roach is defined as a 'physical hazard' but there isn't. Throw that shit out. But then again I am a civilized white man so maybe that's why I understand this.
>>533666734its from the official foodsafe program you need for working in restaurants and cafes>>533666895now that i think about it most insects should just be physical hazards because biological hazards tend to mean more virus related stuff but cockroaches are usually really nasty bugs that tend to carry a lot of viruses and bacteria around so it kinda makes sense to label them biological. but apparently its all dandy because Klaus Schawb or whoever the fuck thinks you need to feed on vermin
>>533663896>food shortages>billions must die>problem solved
>>533667260Oh god that's even worse. Why the fuck is the cockroach "physical hazard" going away because you cooked it to 74C?
