*start watching @10:15>https://rumble.com/v78v2zohttps://rumble.com/v78v2zohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_retrocession
this would require the supreme court getting involved which they wont
>>533683977>replies 30 seconds later Canada flagexecutive order
>Jason Snead, director of the Honest Elections project
>>533683950Thats not why it was retroceded though. It was retroceded becuase it was a comparatively economically unproductive area, too remote to the primary areas of development, and DC didn't really want it. River traffic which took effort favored the more developed DC side, it wasn't all that developed itself, and the economy it did have was still more tied to virginia than thebrest of the district. Slavery was a more contributing incidental economic factor than the primary one. They more or less gave it back becuase they thought it stunk and preferred it be someone elses problem. Regardless, it would be a hilarious move.
>>533683950Giving that land back to DC would solve the Virginia question
>>533684803>Thats not why>'that'Multiple reasons—that concatenated over several decades leading up toit—impinged on the retrocession act. Demographics of the region have changed vastly in 180 years
>>533684048trumps going to prison for treason. his orders are bs
