[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_6544.jpg (312 KB, 1170x1497)
312 KB JPG
>New York, why would you defend that shithole?
Because suburbs in New York look like the bottom, suburbs everywhere else look like the top.
>>
Only in the west Coast do suburbs look like top.
>>
God bless NYC.
>>
>>533691500
>no context twitter screenshot
>time wasting question
>1pbtid
>100+ replies guaranteed
yup, its 4chan time
>>
>>533691500
10k to remove a fallen tree and repair your home
8k to chop the tree down.
act of god
if you have a tree in your yard make sure it never grows over your roof
>>
File: IMG_1572.jpg (828 KB, 1284x918)
828 KB JPG
>>533691500
yes you can’t fully transplant 60-90’ trees without great risk and expense i agree

do people not realize that the size of a neighborhood’s trees are the marker of how long it’s been established and healthy?
>>
>>533691564
because they are mostly new construction and trees take time to grow
>>
>>533691773
>repair your home
If it wasn't made out of paper it wouldn't get destroyed by a falling log
>>
File: 07062023_MLS-June_133033.jpg (976 KB, 2040x1364)
976 KB JPG
>>533691564
I'm in Washington. A lot of suburbs have trees.
>>
File: IMG_6903.jpg (294 KB, 1170x1188)
294 KB JPG
Imagine having to wake up every weekend and care about something as frivolous as a lawn. I have no yard work! It’s awesoem
>>
>>533691564
They look it in the South and midwest as well.
>>
>>533691500
It's the same place....
>>
>>533692194
It's ai
>>
>>533691564
It looks green in the areas with money. I live in a low income area and the city constantly sends people to cut down the few trees we do have because of interfering with electric cables or the roots lifting the sidewalk. Of course, these are just excuses because the companies that do the lumber cutting profit from it. Rich areas sidewalks are destroyed but they don't allow them to cut the trees because it's a luxury. Fuck I hate this system
>>
>>533692236
Yes but it's still basically the same place, the house on the right is exactly the same but with bushes and the concrete drive/street is gone.
>>
>>533692386
It's fake and gay and you're dumb and stupid.
>>
>>533691500
It's just new build vs older development. My Texas suburb has even denser greenery than the that.
>>
>>533691788
> do people not realize that the size of a neighborhood’s trees are the marker of how long it’s been established and healthy?
Good point
>>533692442
Why you butthurt? Looks like is the key phrase. It was one neighborhood greenery and with it.
>>
>>533692536
So Sovl vs soulless?
>>
>>533691500
it's almost like trees take time to grow, what an insane fucking thing isnt it.
every single house in that first image has a tree in the front yard. in 30 years, it WILL be the bottom image.
it feels like no one ever cares to imagine what things might look like in the future because they're so stuck in the here and now and they think things can only ever get worse.
>>
>>533692609
Never mind the houses built today are also shit materials and shoddy construction compared to back then. Being an “old neighborhood” already in the year 2006 (let alone 2026) is way different from being an “old neighborhood” in 2056. I can’t even imagine these houses surviving that long. Who’s gonna live in them?
>>
>>533691837
Trees are a maintenance nightmare and pest magnet, most landed gentry boomers really do hate them.
>>
File: aww boo hoo.gif (1.25 MB, 400x400)
1.25 MB GIF
>>533692442
Did somebody get up on the wrong side of bed...
>>
>>533691500
>trees take time to grow
>>
Bump
>>
>>533692683
the houses built in the 60's and 70's were also shoddy and garbage, you're just not aware of it.
the housing boom after WW2 was immense and the pace of construction rapid. the cheapest most efficient methods of construction were the norm. they ended up tearing down so many of those shitty suburbs in later decades after they started falling apart. you only think houses from that time were better, because only the better examples are still around.
the fate for some of these shitty neighborhoods you see being built today are going to be the same for the shitty neighborhoods of the past. they'll fall apart, get abandoned, be bought up by a developer and bulldozed to the ground to be replaced with a walmart, or an interchange, an apartment complex, a data center, it doesnt really matter what in the end. they'll be gone, and in 50 years people will look back and say 'wow they dont build homes nowadays like they used to back in 2020'
>>
>>533691500
in the bottom picture both sides of the street should lined with cars all the way down, New York is a sanctuary state and every house has 15 people minimum.
>>
Did you know! Trees near roads paradoxically reduce car accidents because drivers have a spatial frame of reference on their speed in relation to other drivers?

Real study btw!
https://www.naturewithin.info/Roadside/Tree&Driver_ITE.pdf
>>
>>533694766
and yes you can achieve this same effect with roadside indicators but it would look very unaesthetic
>>
as a new yorker idk what to say. big up my niggas
>>
>>533691915
94 Yorkstone Heath SW in Calgary, Alberta
>>
>>533691915
Grim and zogged
>>
>>533692004
Only the new ones.
>>
>>533691500
Old construction versus new construction. Many new American homeowners like a sterile environment with no leaf litter and no bug infestations. You can walk in your house with shoes on and track no dirt inside. Plant a few low-maintenance shrubs in a mulch plastic garden and you're good to go. Even lawns are hardly green anymore. All these new subdivisions have such ratty ugly lawns.
>>
>>533694931
It spacemaxxes as much as possible without sharing walls with neighbors. As long as there are large natural areas nearby, there's no need to have nature in your front yard.
>>
>>533692609
Nope, in 30 years all those planted trees will be dead or stunted because the soil they use in these new developments is lifeless fill dirt.
>>
>>533691500
Only nyfags think ny is special. Literally every suburb in the northeast especially all of New England looks like that, you I'm walking here retard.
>>
>>533693165
They definitely used more solid wood and materials than today in the 60s-70s. Houses went to shit in the 90s.
>>
>>533691500
>Because suburbs in New York look like the bottom, suburbs everywhere else look like the top.
Thanks for reminding me my Long Island neighborhood is really comfy and beautiful to walk or run around. Without fail I always see a few people walking or biking around, it's nice
>>
>>533692946
Reminder this haunted pussy bitch got a breast reduction and is Squirrel Girl in Marvel Rivals.
>>
>>533695738
i'm also from long island.
make long island great again
>>
>>533695738
hey fuck you bitch I'm also here. who tf would want to live in this empty shithole. there's really nothing here except a bunch of trees that will be obliterated for shekelsteins 7th mcmansion. welcome to hell fuckface.
>>
NJ suburbs look like bottom too but safer
>>
>>533696090
new jersey is literally 15% white
>>
>>533691500
OP doesn't understand how trees and time works
>>
>>533696645
traditional northeast suburbs are without questino better than the modern suburbs built across the usa
>>
Lack of trees looks so bad.
Those take 40+ years to grow big enough, unless it's some kind of bush.
>>
>>533697031
it's not just the trees though. it's also walkability, sense of place, and access to transit. a suburb in ny is much more likely to be walkable, have easy access to commuter rail into the city and buses, and have sense of place/community
>>
File: IMG_0453.jpg (45 KB, 736x436)
45 KB JPG
>>533696112
>>
>>533692609
Lol the boomers that live there will have the trees cut down in 5 years because they think it's gonna fall on their stupid house
>>
>>533697131
what the fuck does this have to do with anything? nj is 15% white
>>
>>533697131
holding up a passport as a point of pride as an american is goy coded
>>
>>533692609
The problem is that most of the developments pack the houses in so tight that there's no room for large trees without posing a huge risk of damaging the house.
>>
>>533691837
No because those suburbs are built in a fucking desert of all places. It will never look like the bottom pic.
>>
>>533696112
Leas really, shitalians aren't white.
>>
>>533695039
Not sharing a wall with a neighbor isn't an advantage when your house is literally one meter away from your neighbour's. Might as well make terraced houses in that case
>>
>>533697447
Wouldn’t say “goy coded” but it’s definitely not White American behavior. It’s something you expect Europeans or Asians or Indians to do.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.