He is the greatest polymath of our time.
>>533706739Mein gott ich ein racoon penis sex monster
>>533706858>>533706739Trump won
My name is Buttfuckers, welcome to Not Sure
>>533706900>>533706858>>533706739You lost trannies and Trump way of calculating percentage is the right one
>>533706900kek
>>533706739
>>533706739Why is the radical left preventing our schools from teaching the correct way to calculate percentages?
>>533706963Show your work.
>>533706739more like a 590% reduction
>>533707269per cent on the dollar that is!
>>5337067396000% would have made more sense, but he's right to spin it that way vs. working off of the ridiculous inflated starting price.You're just really gay.
>>533706739This is North Korea tier shit
>>533706739OP is a faggot
>>533706739mark levin was right, he is the first jewish president
>>533708171>old imageThe funny part is people not understanding rounding. It's just a mental shortcut. If you can't work out common core you're 80iq.
I get that it's a 98.3% reduction, by my math.10/600 = 1.6666 etc.
98.3% reduction, I dont accept holocaust math
>>533708396Oh so its pajeet math? Is this why your software is all dogshit?
>>533706739Liberals can't stand that America has the greatest president it has ever had or ever will have. He is literally redefining history and changing reality to this making. He is chosen by the lord and is the closest one to God and the leftist hate that. The fact you're all too stupid to understand his brilliance shows how lost the country is. He needs to stop all elections until the people finally understand why he won 3 times in a row.
My brain has no concept of what something 600% cheaper meansMy brain has a very clear understanding of what something 98% cheaper meansTrumps propaganda works against his own goals
>>533708926>My brain has no concept of what something 600% cheaper meansPresumably that you can afford 6x more than you could before, but even that doesn't work with the OP which makes me think it's a complete lie because your enemy are evil and want you dead.
>>53370673910 * 60 is 600.it is a 60 times reduction.For "per cent" (literally means "per 100" afaik), you multiply with 100. (Same price would be 100%).So this is a reduction of 6000%.It is actually a serious issue for their country, if they can't do that correctly.
>>533708396Bill Gates is hiding out in Australia now?
>>533709205Consider the possibility that OP is either lying or he just made a slip of the tongue in the moment.
>>533709205sorry for my autismo, but 6000%? 60 times reduction? it's 59 times, as the 10 remain.>600 : 100% = 10 : x%>100% - x% = 98,3%
>>533708997>>533709295https://youtu.be/eEttrNcRgD4?is=Sf9CGcoBvdiYKtZfThis is based off a prior statement by Trump, so unless both Trump and RFK independently had the same slip of the tongue at different moments, it's intentional.
>>533706739miggers will defend this
>>533710699You can say both. Technically 6000% the value changes by 6000% since this is the number you multiply by. A change of 100% would then change nothing (multiply by 1).But if you talk about an increase, people usually use your version. It is roughly the same in this case, so I didn't care.
>>533711259perhaps, but the statement referred to reduction from 600 to 10. which sets the 600 at 100%, thus making it a 98,3% reduction of 600.
>>533708555Incorrect. The price reduced from 600 to 10, from 10 to get to 600 you would have to multiply by 60. Percentages are in hundreds though, so you add two zeros to 60 and arrive at 6000% for the increase, but since it was a deduction you deduct a zero and get to Trump’s correct calculation of 600%.
>>533711390You are multiplying by 1/60. that is a 6000% reduction. It is an inverse. This is a well defined, correct usage.If that is what people are making fun of, things are WAY worse than I thought.Retards memorising shit instead of using their brain.It is well defined. It can be used.
>>533706739This faggot Aaron Rupar, keeps coming to /pol/ and using VPNs, to promote his shit twatter takes. Permaban all twatter screens from Aaron Rupar.
Next:2 + 2 = 5
>>533706739terrance howard vibes
>>533707195they won't show their work and you aren't willing to die to see it.
>>533711636no. read the OP pic again. if you inceased a price from 10 to 600, that wouldn't be 600% or 6000% either. it would set the 10 as 100% and add 59 times that, which would equal a 5900% increase. if we're talking reduction from 600 to 10 then that's a 98,3% reduction. calling me a retard doesn't change that.
>>533708171The method works really well if you have a brain. You need to use more sensible numbers than a bunch of stupid 10s though. 427-316= 427-320+4 = 107+4 = 111If you are good at it, you can solve really complex math problems in your head quickly.555*27 = 555*20 + 555*711100 + 555*711100 + 555*10 - 555*311100 + 5550 - 166516650 - 166516650 - 1600 - 6515050 - 65 = 14985It can be a lot to keep track of, but the method isn't the problem -- the teachers are.
>>533712381From 10 to 600 is a roughly 60 times change.From 600 to 10 is a 1/60 change.This can be labelled as a 60 times reduction (to make communication convenient).This is well defined. You probably never interacted with university math courses if you do not understamd the usage of definitions. Not even being offensive. I failed all my maths courses.I am dogshit at maths. But you are worse.
>>533706739Trump is right though.If you raise he price from $10 to $600 it is 6000%Under the dumb dumb math it is 0% increase because it is now $600.Trump just flipped the percentages.>BUBUBUBUBUBB YOU CANT DO THAT>YOU Can't GO BELOW 100%Yes you can. Take a banana and split it half. Now you have 2, but still one banana.
>>533713380no it's not right retard. It's a matter of the definition of the word decrees and the definition of the word percentage. a 600% decrees from 600 is -3,000. You can flip it around back and forth a million times doesn't change it's wrong way to say something
>>533713251Percent increase and decrease is exactly as >>533712381describes. Fractional increasing and decreasing is exactly as you describe -- colloquially. It can be imprecise, so percent increase and decrease is preferred because the fractions can be expressed as a percent and they won't even be near the right answer.One caveat: you should be saying a "1/60 change", and never a "1/60 decrease"A -100% increase means going to 0. This is a clarity issue.
>>533713251kek. well defined dogshit. if you want to goalshift to conversationally palatable then it would have been wise to say, "that's 59 times less". and yes, i have interacted with uni math courses. t. useless economics degree
>>533713686> Fractional decrease is exactly as I dictateMaths is not a religion. You can use whatever definitions you want as long as zhey are well defined.The usage is well defined and anybody can easily understand it. So my criticism of "memorising text-books in religious fashion" is correct.
>>533708555You're forgetting that jews need to put sixes everywhere for some reason.
>>533707131If 2+2=5 then a 600% reduction is 600-10.
>>533713955100 is decreased by 1/100.Is it 99? Or 1?It could mean either if your definition is imprecise.100 is changed by 1/100It is 1."100 is decreased by 1/100" should mean 99 by any reasonable definition of the words, but you use the word "decrease" to signal that a change is negative without regard for clarity. Ambiguity is a language problem.
>>533714363> ImpreciseYou can buy 6000% the amount of medicine for the same amount of money. Labelling that as a 6000% price reduction is no less precise than any other usage of language.English (and all other spoken languages) are extremely imprecise. Both usages are fine. Saying his usage is incorrect, is not fine.Whether it is a 59 times increase in medicine bought or a 60 times increase (both can be used).>>533713950Useless physics dropout*
>>533707886Media would have ignored reporting on it. Now they do.
>>533715370I didn't say it was incorrect, just that the intention behind "you may or may not tack on the word 'decrease' if the change is negative" was incorrect.Saying 6000% price reduction can only reasonably mean one thing, so I can't fault Trump for incorrect use of language. However, I can say it is stupid and misleading. That's good marketing, though.If you have to clarify what you mean then your words are imprecise. If the goal of language is to clearly express ideas, then those words are incorrect.
>aaron rupar>disregardThe RFK hate is funny to watch. He's by all accounts a "bleeding heart liberal". He's a democrat. He dedicated his life to "climate change". In that process he had people approaching him because of their vax damaged kids. The people who hate RFK are simply of a cult mindset.Those people will claim all day long they're against corporations except when it comes to big pharma profiteering off of mandating 70+ shots to every newborn baby. Clearly a racket. Clear evidence that vaccines have killed and injured countless people in the past.And yet these retards will reflexively deny any claim that vaccines could be harmful. Further, RFK was running for president AS A DEMOCRAT. And my personal view is that they planned to replace Biden the entire time. They installed a guy w\ a well known name to get the votes, because Kamala only got 1% in the prior primary. They literally sued RFK, and attacked him to force him to switch parties so they wouldn't have to have a democrat primary.These people attack RFK for his past drug use despite left wing ideology being accepting of drug use. They attack his speech even though they will burn your house down if you say the word RETARD. Yet, they have no problem insulting a guy for a disability. The last person in his post was a fat trans person... a person sick in the head, and sick in obesity in charge of public health... nigga you gotta be kidding me.
>>533711259Are you high? If something is 50% off it is half price. If something is 100% off it is FREE. From $600 to $10 is almost free. 98.3% reduction is correct.
>>533706739i spit on trump but hes not entirely wrongeven if that way of expressing ratios is functionally retarded
>>533708834king and one race kingdom is bestlook at china 1 race kingdom going zoom zoom
>>533706739math bros help me out if i have $600 and the price is reduced by 100% how many dollars is that?
>>533717058if you have $600 and some price is reduced by 100%, then you still have $600 plus whatever you "bought" for $0. makes sense? it's antisemitic though. what about VAT? and what about GDP? don't you care for israel at all?
>>533717359it goes into the gdp, because the company that does the rabate paid for it, although maybe inot in its entirety, but it could be made to.and vat is still present only vat on 0% is 0its mathematic pilpul, but i have a high iq in verbal and very high in spatial so i cant help myself
>>533717573mathematically correct pilpul and i salute your various high IQs. it does go into gdp once as the purchase transaction of the 'seller'. however, it is supposed to be sold, thus going into gdp a second time. as for vat, the seller's business would have requested refund of the vat he paid himself, so that's a negative on tax income. twice actually, as the 100% rebate is making a loss on his balance sheet, thus diminishing his taxable income. shivers down my spine about this obvious disregard of jewish interests.
>>533706892Your TDS makes you cry tranny.YWNBAW
>>533718127>high iqsthats my prussian blood ;)it could be pilpulled that the seller pays for the rabate himself, as in: he buys the product himself THEN gifts it to the client with a 100% rabatebut that doesnt get taxed on the transactionso yeah, its anudda shoahthe goyim are acting up again, always plotting against the interests of israelthe talmud needs updating to prevent giving out shit for free. but only for the goyimwhich is halfway done because we get taxed on inheritance as if it were a transaction.
>>533718441>seller pays for the rebate himselfhe does and in the closed system of his business this creates a loss. there were interesting things going on for long with "vat carousel" refunds in circle trades across borders, where no actual goods were involved at all. funny, how it was jews profiting from this, but of course they deserve it. the world is their farm, as promised millenia ago.
>>533706739its all about ratios... 98,34 period
>>533719415>the jewish covenanteverything they say is pilpul and attempts at dodging their obligationssorry for the delay, someone called me, i needed to answerporfesionnal shit and suchgotta make money somehowand yes, i take paying my rent ofer 4chan points. sorry, but it is what it isi have to pay for this shit and i have to find money for it somehow
>>533718333Kike out, this is MAGA COUNTRY
>>533706739He's just living his truth. Anyone that argues is a racist.
>>533722728working hard to feed the overlords. trump just needs to rugpull and taco for his billions. let's see if he can reduce a price of 600 down to 10. not looking good rn.
>>533713018>555*27 = 555*20 + 555*7I have no idea what I'm even looking at, but why wouldn't you just make it 555x30-555x3 so you only multiply once?
