Now that the dust has settled, what did RFK/Trump mean by this?
>>533746060>what did RFK/Trump mean by this?that they are retarded
instead of posting pedanticisms why don't you make yourself useful and get me the prices of all consumer drugs before and after this policy was institutied.
>>533746204And while he's at it, get me a beef and bean burrito, gracias.
The democrats turned on RFK, a guy who dedicated his life to the environmental cause. They attack him relentlessly. And they dare to say a peep about him knowing that they put a fat trans person in his post when biden was in office.The guy in charge of public health shouldn't be mentally ill and fat.
>>533746295the trans person was the one writing emails and tweets, not the one leading the department. the department is now led by someone who used to do coke off toilet seats and collects raccoon penises
>>533746060That cock gobbling faggots like you should be thrown off buildings for obsessively posting about trump.
>>533746396are you mad
>>533746204>pedanticismsFirst off it's pedantry, and secondly, watching the government go full North Korea with "the dear Leader invented his own math" is creepy as fuck
>>533746295>The guy in charge of public health shouldn't be mentally ill and fatbut enough about trump!
>>533746688kek
This is just sad
He was thinking in log returns. Too big brain for you
>>533746155Not at all.Your knee-jerk assessment is retarded.I have some stocks that are over 200% from my initial investment. It is clear, You don't understand the concept.Why are you like this?
>>533746455>first off it’s pedantryShowing your obsession with pedantism is only proving his point.
>>533748281What if your $200 stock falls to $100? What percentage loss would that be?
Is this the newest shill script that will be spammed relentlessly by 1pbtid's for the next three weeks?
>>533746060kek what a fucking retard
>>533746060The people running our country can't do math!
>>533746060It’s that good ole fashion American education fast at work
>>533748455Never mentioned a "$200" stock. But in your example, it would be down 50%. (-50%).
>>533746060Sweet so now drug dealers pay you to pick up an 8-ball or what?
>>53374615570yo should be banned from any direction.
>>533746060That's not even a 600% rise, that's 600% what it was. A 600% rise would be $700
>>533746060Americans are notoriously uneducated, this extends to the upper class as well.
why 600% and not 60%?
>>533749495The actual decrease is 83.3 (repeating of course) percent.
>>533746060WRONG. It's a 500% increase and an 83.33% decrease
>>533749311Nigga... 1x6=6
>>533750211If something is 100 and it went to 200, it's a 100% *increase* or rise as he calls it in the post. That term has a specific mathematical definition, if you dont believe me try this calculator.https://www.rapidtables.com/calc/math/percentage-increase-calculator.html?v1=100&v2=200You're right that 600 is 600% of 100 but thats not what we're talking about.
>>533746155Did you know that you were the clown and retard the whole time? Stupid people think they're geniuses, nevermind.
>>533746060A 98% increase could mean 1% effectiveness increasing to a 1.98% effectivenessA 600% decrease from 6 would be -30If you want 6 to decrease to 1 it would be a decrease of 83%The problem isn't the lack of understand by itself but the repeated assertions of correctness despite complete ignorance.
>>533746060No one understands what was meant. A 600% drop in price is very, very improbable, because it would be a negative number which would imply the company is paying you to take the drugs.A 600% drop from $100 would be -$500. A 600% drop from $600 would be -$3000. The company would be paying you -$3000 to take the drug. Perhaps if it went back from being a retail drug to a experimental drug. Highly unlikely.
>>533754392What was meant is that everyone in the oval office is a puppet that does what its Israeli handler tells it to do.
>>533754392he was meant to say it went from $100 to $600 and now it is back at $100 again. So a x6 increase (600%) and if you divide by the same amount you get back to the original. But as you say you cannot decrease by 600% whilst you can increase by 600% - max is 100% before you start going into negative amounts because 100% is the very amount you are dealing with (which was $600). Ironically kikes do use percentages to confuse people
>>533746204It's kind of hard to get that, but Bernie made a report.
>>533755384
