This is what happens when you don't wear a condom, too much competition, a fucked up work force and economy
This is the graph to show for retards who think low birth rates is bad
>>533765570Your god, Malthus, was proved wrong about every single prediction he made in his life, and his followers proceeded to make nothing but incorrect predictions from then until today.The population bomb is bunk. We don't have too many people. We have too many browns.
>>533765629Any group with a birth rate below 2 is dying, and everything they value will be destroyed by browns.You are in a global breeding war.
>>533765667>>533765702India has a tfr below replacement level now, Latin America is aging too, some SEA countries like Thailand is literally on the level of south korea now and even Islamic nations like Iran and UAE have low tfr. Only Africa has high tfr because they're poor
>>533765570that makes no sense. a larger population also means more demand and more jobs.population size is not an explanation for a bad job market.
>>533765667>We don't have too many people. We have too many browns.Indeed. What's infuriating is that (((we))) insist on subsidizing all of their food
>>533765629>>533765667>>533765702>>533765779>>533765810>>533765837
*blocks your path*
>>533765667>We don't have too many people. We have too many browns.So, you're saying that a population around 1 billion is right, since that's about the number it would be if not for non-whites?
>>533765810stagnation of technology culls any push for a larger market.law of diminishing returns.at each technological advancement we can push x number of jobs due to technological efficiency increase.this means>we can dig deeper, quicker, cheaper gaining more fertilizer>to plant more crop turnover to feed more families>to sustain more workers cooking foodas population increases and technology maintains or decreases, it cost increasingly more to continue working the same technological curve.an extra berry picker ain't going to bring in more money.in fact they often times cost corporations far more money.the age old allegory >TOO MANY COOKS SPOIL THE BROTHis what is in play.we are forever increasing the amount of people doing jobs that were already able to be done by only 1-2 people, now it is taking 5 people to do the same job.if technology increased we would see expansion where 5 people could do the work of 5 people again.instead of this hand holding let's all do the minimum.
