Tanner has already been found guilty. This trial is solely for the jury to decide if he should get the death penalty or not. Why should these random ass strangers decide that instead of the victim's family?You literally can't avenge your own daughter, but you can be forced to go overseas and kill foreigners abroad.What a joke. It is not like he hasn't already been found guilty. It makes sense to have impartial strangers determine guilt. But, if he is determined already guilty, why should strangers decide the outcome and not the victim's family?
If I committed a crime I definitely wouldn't want my victim to decide my sentence because he's obviously going to favor the worst possible sentence instead of something reasonable.
>>533805585I may agree with that if it wasn't a murder trial.
>>533805673Why is murder different in principle to some other crime in this respect?
>>533805421Thew family should sneak an obsidian blade into court and deal out a fatal blow to him. No appeal on the docket.
>>533805421A lesson to all. Do not have kids. You are literally supporting the elite when you do. In more ways than you could ever imagine
>>533805774Because something like theft could be extremely subjective to the punishment. The simplest form of reasonable justice is an eye for an eye. I'm more of a two eyes for one eye, since you started it by taking the eye first. But, in either scenario, death would be the worst outcome with the exception of some form of torture. But being sentenced to death for murder makes sense logically.
>>533806169I'm not talking about capital punishment in general but instead the idea that the victim or someone related to them should decide the punishment. What makes murder unique that the sentencing for it should be like this whereas this shouldn't be the case with any other crime?
>>533806343Because someone deciding that for murder results in murder being the worst punishment, which fits the crime.But, someone deciding the punishment to be the death penalty for something ridiculous like a kid stealing some candy woukd be so disproportionate.You can't get that level of disproportionate if the crime is murder.
the entire point of a jury trial is that no one individual is personally responsible for the outcome aside from the criminal. not the judge, not any one member of the jury, not any lawyer involved anywhere.having the victim or their family decide on punishment now makes them responsible for the outcome.it's a holdover from a time when people believed in judgement after life. you won't have to answer for the killing of the guy who murdered your child because you didn't decide whether or not he dies.
>>533805421He needs to be hung in the town square live streamed to send a message. If we did that this would happen a lot less
>>533805585Define a “reasonable” punishment for murdering a child
You didn't care when Trump did the same thing?
>>533806537Some people do think that the death penalty is disproportionate in all cases, or unwise. And if the problem of proportionality makes it so that the victim of a crime shouldn't decide in one case then I can't see why not in a murder case.BTW, I wonder what would happen if a victim decided that a criminal should be killed and then it was later revealed that he was wrongfully convicted.
STOP POSTING THIS
>>533806848Sure, but if the option is on the table and being decided then it should be the victim's family deciding, not a group of random strangers.
>>533806343You’re right it shouldn’t be up to the family because the family might forgive and not pull the trigger. In murders like this where it’s a kid and obviously him since it was recorded the murderer should be hung in front of the court house
>>533807057Well if it's just an option then that implies that the death penalty may be disproportionate in a murder case.Otherwise a judge could pass sentence without needing to ask anyone, like with most crimes.
>>533806694*hanged
>>533805421I'm honestly surprised they don't have him clapping her dead cheeks in court for everyone to see on live TV or maybe the video of her cheeks being clapped on repeat. >Muh jury muh emotions>>533806818Technically they don't care and hope they get to see her cheeks being clapped. Everyone here should be punished in some form including the parents and employer.
>>533805585Maybe dont commit a crime you nigger
>>533805585You'd think that but amerilards are so cucked nowadays that a tyrone can literally rape every orifice of an underage girl, dismember her while she's still alive and the faggot dad would gladly gulp down all that nigger semen from her pussy and let the agitated hoodlum off with community service because muh racism and jesus told him to turn his cheeks
wergild status?
>>533805585And what would be the worst, in this case? Really.I agree that this is just a big waste of time.
>>533805421To bad the only acceptable sentencing for this guy is public hanging while being beating with bats like a piñata.
>>533805421>Nigga listens to the stateLmfao pussified. I only answer to God
>>533805421>you can be forced to go overseas and kill foreigners abroad.what year are you living in
>>533805421You can't always rely on the victim's family to do the right thing. If you can recall that kid who got stabbed to death at the track meet, his father forgave the nigger who did it or whatever. That it is a question of whether murderers should be put to death is a sign humanity has sunken to its lowest depths yet.
>>533805421Because mob justice is fucking retarded. Having a gay little rage parade and coming up with torture methods like a youtube comment section is 3rd world bullshit. Death penalty should be simple and quick and not cost ten trillion dollars but it's just another financial black hole like every other aspect of western justice.
>>533805421this is a white man on white femoid crime. a certain indulgence is due IMO.
>>533805421haven't kept up with this but did he just go full neanderthal and kill her or was he motivated by desires?
>>533806794Being throw into a pit full of feral starving shitbulls while naked and covered in bacon grease.
