[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>no heterosexual male of models with female simps
>no heterosexual male prostitutes
>no hetero strip clubs where straight women go solo to enjoy male bodies, its always a social functiom for women
>no sexualised clothing for straight men, clothes women consider "hot" on men hide the body like suits and firefighters uniform
>when "straight" women are asked what they like about their men, its "they make me feel safe and protected", if you ask lesbians what they like about women they say "theyre sexy and beautiful"
>if a man receives a nude from a random woman he is thrilled, if a woman receives a random nude from a man she is disgusted
>tinder is a desert for men, grindr (gay dating app) is an endless orgy
>even womens "erotic fiction" is all about the woman and her experience, the mans job is to just affirm her desirability, he is not the object himself
>in studies its been found that "straight" identified women get more aroused by images of women than men

honestly, considering all these points, it seems like womens heterosexuality is just a societal performance and they dont actually sexually desire men, even so called "chads" much at all. whats /pol/'s take on this? do you think this may have something to do with the "male loneliness epidemic"?
>>
>>533821128
>men and women are different
Damn dude, I see that you’re from Scandinavia but that really isn’t an excuse for how plebeian and lame all these obvious observations you have are.
>>
>>533821209
It’s quite significant that all women are some level of asexual deviants tho.
>>
>>533821209
cynical reductionism is passé.
>>
>>533821128
>no sexualised clothing for straight men,

start wearing crop shirts

I would like to see that. I'm very vulnerable to such men. My last boyfriend sunbathed in my garden after we first met and then pulled up the pant legs of his boxershorts upwards to show all of his tighs and stretched out lasciviously.
I gave him a blowjob shortly after seeing this.
Imho men should allow themselves to be more slutty. It would get them laid quicker.
>>
>>533821750
gay
>>
>>533822315
I'm a woman. If man goes full slutmode woman feels more comfortable to put out for the man. at least that was true in my case. If you manage to put herself in the position of the man and himsel in the position of the secretary who lifs her miniskirt in his office, many women will do what many men would do in that situation - unzip and pull out the dick to stuff her mouth. give it a try.
I'm sure Barney Stinson once mentioned it in HIMYM.
>>
File: r9k1.jpg (359 KB, 800x800)
359 KB JPG
>>533821128
GO BACK
>>
>>533823441
you ok?
>>
Have sex, incel.
>>
>>533822423
Utterly backwards cattle mindset. What the fuck is wrong with women?
>>
File: 1708724059856314.png (270 KB, 1635x512)
270 KB PNG
>>533821128
thread
>>
>>533821574
That was not cynical reductionism, that was just simple ridicule aimed at a faggot observing regular biological behavior and judging it inferior.
Being able to elegantly describe a retarded idea based on false presumptions doesn’t make it less retarded.
>>
>>533821128
>>no sexualised clothing for straight men, clothes women consider "hot" on men hide the body like suits and firefighters uniform
Yea no jew, the only people ever sexualizing and government occupations are homosexual far right fag jews like you. Stop projecting onto women. They never said they find suits hot either and fit that matter everything in this post is bullshit. Literally every line. You're most certainly jewish.
>>
>>533821128
there's no evolutionary incentive for women to be attracted to us because we're already attracted to them and their consent was not an obstacle for 99% of our existence, competition with other men was.
women just evolved a desire for stronger more dominant men because that meant more predictability and fewer children dying.
>>
>>533826256
>jew!!!
i have blond hair, blue eyes and an intact penis that wasnt ritually mutilated. i wonder how many of these apply to you.
>>
File: 1766709191916122.mp4 (2.51 MB, 480x854)
2.51 MB MP4
>>533822423
>Zestymaxxing is a real thing
>>
Reddit was right! Women are not into men,

https://www.reddit.com/r/WomenAreNotIntoMen
>>
File: 1749902057114533.jpg (59 KB, 563x518)
59 KB JPG
>>533828903
What the fuck am I looking at?
>>
>>533821128
There shouldn't be any political implications to any of this because women shouldn't have rights
>>
>>533827447
>Sneaking in
They were probably allowed to just walk in the front door since they look like women.
>>
File: obesity in usa.png (1.34 MB, 963x1718)
1.34 MB PNG
>>533821128
My idea about the male loneliness epidemic is this: Why the fuck are you going to slave away your whole life for some fat ugly lazy whore?
The problem you see is actually obesity. Put your big brain hats on. With all the high fructose goy slop, like 80% of women are overweight or some dumb shit. Half of women are 5x5 you know five feet tall five feet around, ogrina goblina americana, marshmallow cottage cheese golems. Women have to be healthy to conceive and being healthy means you're beautiful (well muscled, have enough fat, can walk and move elegantly - not crippled, nice skin, good hair, all signs of good health and breeding). There's a reason nobody wants the ugly hag to breed with, no good kids coming out of that thing. Anyways processed obesity fucked up health so fucking bad it's made the medical sector the powerhouse of our economy.
Say we were back to medieval farming, and every woman was picking cabbages and sewing clothes instead of tik-tok and box wine. Instantly obesity goes to 1%. Then 99% of women are at least attractive from the neck down/behind. Suddenly men aren't simping for the last hot woman alive. And it gets even better: Once every woman is attractive, they to start COMPETING with each other. This means they'll actually have to be useful or have a good personality. So you won't have to settle for the desperate tranny anymore.
All we have to do is wreck the farming industry by destroying their subsidies... or maybe not just end food welfare completely instead. Does anybody even care if they starve other than elected democrats?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.