[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2563.jpg (88 KB, 1170x795)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
Is this true?
>>
>>533854308
France has, historically, been an absolute behemoth in warfare, yes.
>>
>>533854308
Why do I care about an African nation that worships shit skins.
>>
>>533854521
>French Canadians import shitjeets by the millions
>>
>>533854536
But enough about the United States, we’re talking about French history
>>
>>533854603
Quebec is the least welcoming to foreigners of all provinces in Canada and the ones that the federal government forces on us has singlehandedly revived separatism. PQ supermajority next election.
>>
>>533854308
When in the name of God did the French invade Wales
>inb4 muh normans
>>
>>533854608
Oh defending niggers glownigger jew how typical of you
>>
>>533854670
Because Scandinavians totally consider Normans their own, right?
LMAO
>>
>>533854664
Well niggers are not known for being polite but doesn't make what I said less true now does it
>>
File: GEz1Cx0WgAA3W8x.jpg (117 KB, 1196x1200)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
>>533854308

Frances greatest heroes are a schizophrenic little girl, and a midget italian,
>>
>>533854603
>>533854664
Queerbekers are the biggest negrophiles known to mankind. I saw a group of them at a costco once in fuckin BC and everyone of the men had a coal black nigger wife speaking their horrid queerbeker "french"
>>
>>533854823
Charles Martel was pretty cool.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Martel
>>
File: freikorps impressed.jpg (223 KB, 960x960)
223 KB
223 KB JPG
>>533854726
>per-emtptive coping and seething
Guess that answers that question.
>>
>>533854938
I'm just tired of people acting like they don't belong anywhere.
>NOOO, YOU'RE NOT ACTUALLY FRENCH
>NOOO, YOU'RE NOT ACTUALLY SCANDINAVIAN

Meanwhile, Normans have been at the forefront of science, engineering and warfare the whole time.
>>
>>533854308
nah
>>
>>533854823
>a midget italian
Corsican.
>>
>>533854308
Yea, but they really fucked up in ww2 and so its pretty deserved. Like how did they lose that fast? What the fuck were they doing out there?
>>
>>533854688
>everyone I disagree with is a jew
Rule 1488 of /pol/
>>
>>533854993
>creating new ways to surrender and worship niggers
>>
>>533855118
The language you speak right now is half Norman French. Maybe you should open a history book to find out why.
>>
>>533855116
Noticing you are defending a VPN glownigger from your new jew utopia. How odd you want to steer the conversation away from how African France is
>>
>>533855224
So what that doesnt make Paris a white city again does it? Your cope to cover for France being an African colony is noted
>>
>>533854664
>i-it the feds, not me wanting to get cucked in le frog croak
actual cope.
>muh seperatism
if the pq actually wanted to leave they'd also run an anglo pq outside quebec and actually get a super majority.
>>
>>533855333
The PQ is a provincial party, you fucking retard. The BQ won't even exist in a couple years because we won't be part of Canada.
>>
>>533854521
all of france was basically financed by jews to push independency from london and they never won shit. jews are terrible at war but they are good at playing tricks and dissolving the roman empire will not be forgotten.
>inb4 much kike seething
>>
>>533854308
Not accurate at all. Outside of Napoleon, France did just ok militarily through most of history if you factor in their population advantage they had during all that time.

Then as their culture liberalized and their population stopped increasing they lost any military advantage they had prior to that. Going woke aka "enlightened" ruined France's military abilities as they could no longer throw endless hordes of men at their enemies.

>>533854726
recent DNA tests show that Normandy was indeed Scandinavian at the time of the conquest of the Anglos.
>>
>>533854308
Not really. That's a sour neocon meme propagated after Chirac refused to participate in the Iraq War like a good goy.
>>533854670
>>533854726
>>533854993
Wales was a client state of the Angevin Empire. The famous Stuart dynasty earned its spurs as rulers of the Welsh frontier under the Normans and Angevins iirc.
>>
>>533855414
>missing the point calls this hard.
>getting this mad
try taking the pants off your head before you call others retarded.
>>
>>533855765
inb4
>I WAS JUST PRETENDING!
>>
>>533855765
You can't even tell the difference between provincial and federal political parties.
Shush, now. The adults are speaking.
>>
>>533854608
Watch out, there's a haitian ghoul hiding in your refrigerator! He's using his evil haitian voodoo sonar powers to summon his evil haitian voodoo ghoul relatives! Get him!
>>
>>533854308
yes.
If the world was a movie, France would be the protagonist.
>>
>>533855517
man go pick up your grandfather's corpse in alsace and shut the fuck up
>>
>>533854308
>good on offense
>surrender on defense.
>>
>>533855237
>make colony
>colony colonizes you
¡Welcome to Mexico, pendejo!
>>
>>533856418
Spain made Mexico inbred moron
>>
>>533856481
The only imbred moron in this thread is you, burger king.
>>
File: PetainHitler.png (403 KB, 775x535)
403 KB
403 KB PNG
>>533856135
Negotiating an armistice after 100k French soldiers fought to their death is not a surrender. Electing Petain and pulling off the biggest upset in geopolitical history was actually incredibly based.
>>
>>533855517
Explain Napoleon then
>>533856076
Hardy kek. That was fucking hilarious
>>
>>533855118
>creating new ways to surrender
My friend, you have us beat in that department since long ago.
We surrendered to the 3rd Reich.
You surrendered to every single brand of goat fucker and rice eater under the sun.

>b-but they have McDonald there now so it's still a victory!
As I said, you found new ways to surrender we would have never dared dreaming about.
>>
>>533856922
>drops pin in any French city
>its africa but with better architecture
>>
France today doesn't exist by its own merit. They owe their existence to anglo-kikes. After getting salvaged, France also lost wars & humiliated in Algiers, Vietnam & Sahel.
>>
File: OK.png (111 KB, 2560x1440)
111 KB
111 KB PNG
>>533855831
>NO I LIKE HAVING THE PANTS ON MY HEAD!
>>
>>533856076
lower your tone when speaking to your betters, bulgarian negro
>>
>>533857287
>Fentanyl Floyd's country accusing anyone else of being like Africa
Next, China will criticize other countries for eating dogs.
>>
File: chortling.gif (2.49 MB, 480x360)
2.49 MB
2.49 MB GIF
>>533854308
kek
>>
File: frogpost 25.jpg (90 KB, 961x830)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
What annoys me with the WW2 meme is the claim we surrendered "without a fight".
Sure we got absolutely BTFO and it was a major humiliation, but it wasn't without a fight.

In 1940 we lost 90 000 dead in six weeks.
As a comparison, America lost 50 000 dead in 20 years in Vietnam and won't stop crying about how traumatic it was.
In the Battle of the Bulge (America's most "intense" WW2 battle), Americans lost 8000 dead in five weeks.
>>
>>533856555
>they surrendered on defense
>thats not surrendering on defense because some of them died while defending.
?
>>
>>533854308
Shouldn’t that be russia
>>
>>533855517
get some new material
>>
>>533854308
60% of France's military record was because of Napoleon. If you remove him from the equation their record is actually shit if you count the length of it.
>>
>>533854608
You are also a nigger nation?
>>
File: 1773138530268595.gif (497 KB, 448x256)
497 KB
497 KB GIF
>>533856076
Brutal.
>>
File: 883grv.png (185 KB, 1014x1080)
185 KB
185 KB PNG
>>533858778
Its just the eternal anglo, don't worry about it.

The eternal anglo is at it again with ww3 I guess.
>>
>>533854308
Prior to and during Napoleon, yes.
After Napoleon took every Frenchman with an ounce of fighting spirit and fortitude and let them freeze to death in western Russia, the country has been a laughingstock. This happened in 1812 and they literally never recovered.
>>
>>533854894
sounds hot
>>
>>533854308
France can't into modern warfare. Both pictures are correct
>>
File: frog.jpg (347 KB, 1607x1584)
347 KB
347 KB JPG
Everything is swell.

Du moins, nous ne parlons pas allemand.
>>
File: poland.jpg (77 KB, 970x665)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>
>>533854823
dont forget marty of tours
>>
>>533854308
France died in 1789.
The tranvestite that has passed as France since has been non stop being raped by Germany.

Survival of the fittest.
Or would be, if it were not for Bolshevik Russia and Liberal SA.
>>
File: 1586848330934.png (1.14 MB, 1984x1364)
1.14 MB
1.14 MB PNG
>>533858979
We spent most of our history fighting against coalitions of Germans, Anglos and their minions, and winning more often than not.
Napoleon was our peak, but I'd say we were already doing pretty good before that.
>>
I love france, beautiful country. I wish i were rich enough to live there comfortably.
>>
>>533854903
He was.

>t. my unironical ancestor...
>>
You have to understand, American history class is just WW2 and slavery. They wouldn't know.
>>
File: 1775503645992438.png (2.44 MB, 1195x1200)
2.44 MB
2.44 MB PNG
>>533854308
Churchill made sure that France reputation after WW2 went to the shitter because he wanted Britain to be the sole EU superpower.
>>
>>533855549
The great epoch of French supremacy was actually before the Revolution and Napoleon.
>>
>>533855549
>recent DNA tests show that Normandy was indeed Scandinavian at the time of the conquest of the Anglos.

Fucking hell!
Only a fucking moron mutt would say that.
At best they tested some legit Scandinavian cemiteries in Normandy.

You're a faggot and a moron.
>>
>>533856481
>Spain made Mexico inbred moron

What !?
>>
File: smugapu2.jpg (61 KB, 808x835)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
>>533859581
That's too late then. It was ww2 that effectively ended British superiority worldwide and ushered in the American age. which is why America is now the honorary new Eternal Anglo, and they start wars and meddle with other countries and shit.

Not saying ww3 isn't just, I think the sides are more well defined than they've ever been, and in fact, this one is actually a 'world' war unlike the others which was just Europe superiority/tomfoolery, which has essentially died as Europe has fallen into decadence and decay.
>>
>>533858778
You considered yourselves superior.
You had the largest and best equipped army in Europe.
You even had the unpassable Maginot line.
And most importantly: You were there 100% to defend your gay republic and your gay revolution which you claim would make every Frenchie fight like lions.

It was more than a humiliation.
It was without the fight everybody expected.
Including the Frenchies themselves. Both the elites and more importantly the common man.
>>
File: 222vqhcr3ni31.jpg (108 KB, 600x472)
108 KB
108 KB JPG
>>533859467
not pictured: most the stalemates like the Austrian Succession, Spanish Succession, 7 years' War, etc

France did fine, but it was never anything spectacular when you take its massive population advantage, and the lack of unity within its eastern neighbors into account.

>>533859585
yes exactly, because that was before its demographic crisis caused by liberalism.

>>533859639
>only a moron would report recent DNA studies
>>
>>533859361
AHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAAHAHAH!
>>
File: 1763759247027394.jpg (37 KB, 820x713)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>533854308
We'll we've been fighting them for like 800 years or some shit to the point where it's just friendly banter.
>>
>>533854521
Bullying weak decentralized neighbors, just like Russia. The moment Germany somewhat centralized they got their ass handed to them.
>>
>>533859844
Demographic crisis?
I think they simply got culled and lost the war by 1815.
Then while most other countires were celebrating, industrialising and turning into "national unified empires" (like Germany and Italy) the French were simply depressed, realising they were barely a great power now and ready to be successively raped by Germany.

But most interesting of all is: Why was France so densely populated? Why was it so much larger in population in the XVII and XVIII century than other Euro countries?
I truly have no clue.
>>
>>533859809
We are not *that* decadent and decayed.
You take the American supremacy and opression from our backs and we conquer the world in twenty years.
And this time we'll make sure to depress the shitskins populations so at least 50% of the world is European.
>>
File: smugapuopen.jpg (79 KB, 817x845)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
>>533859844
Europeans aren't going to understand you. Everything to them must come from Europe otherwise it doesn't make sense.

This was the problem with their 'world' wars. Meanwhile the one coming is actually a world war.

Luckily for us, we've put them into a bin where they NEED to work together to defeat a giant enemy. Think X-men versus the Sentinel or some shit. Russia has gotten egregious.

but look what's happened, already they are floundering, Spain doesn't want anything to do with it, there are petty conflicts between their countries and internal civil wars.

Europe has to get their shit together. Never has collective intelligence and defense mattered so much as now.
>>
>>533855101
>Like how did they lose that fast?
Attacked through a vector they didn't consider passable.
>What the fuck were they doing out there?
Repositioning the mobile troops. Being defeated in detail (slowly) on the line they lost communication to and ability to reinforce.

They literally got driven around and by the time they had a clear view of the situation the Germans were on the door of Paris.

The Belgians FUCKED Europe by demanding the line not extend to the sea. Not wanting Belgium to be the battlefield made it the only realistic choice.
>>
>>533859844
>France did fine, but it was never anything spectacular when you take its massive population advantage

The population advantage was compensated by having to face entire coalitions alone.

Anyway the population advantage is overstated.
Take the French revolutionary Wars for exemple.
France had 26 millions inhabitants, which was indeed quite a lot by the standards of the time.
Now let's look at France's enemies
Britain = 10 millions
Prussia = 8 millions
Spain = 10 millions
Russia = 21 millions (35 millions if counting Poland, Lithuania...etc)
Austria + its possessions in Germany and Italy = 41 millions
>>
>>533860183
Why on Earth do you think anyone in Europe to the West of Poland would fight an actual war against Russia?
>>
File: history-of-sweden.png (706 KB, 1170x795)
706 KB
706 KB PNG
>>533854308
>>
>>533854308
France is the largest country in Western Europe and spent a thousand years fighting all the world's most powerful countries and winning.
They have nukes, that they developed themselves unlike basically everyone else who stole it from America (jews, russians) or bought it from jews (everyone else).
They've beaten Russia in war.
Their only failing has been their hubris.
>>
>>533854308
Germany was a sinless nation cruicified for the redemption of others. Jesus of countries.
>>
>>533860388
Most people think about vikings (even though it was mainly Danes and Norvegians) when asked to think about the history of Sweden.
None one among normies know anything about the 17th century.
>>
File: smugapu3.jpg (60 KB, 804x830)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>533860355
It's about sending troops in. You, as Europeans, have collective history. This is going to be a huge wakeup call for the continent that thought they were the epitome of human civilization, during a time when certain European principles, like secularism and apathy towards males are having devastating consequences.

Eventually though, you too, will fundamentally understand that some calls must be answered. This is a call, for once, not on your heritage, cultural background or phenotype, but on your humanity, on your ethical principles, and your way of life. You will find it difficult NOT to get behind it, and I fundamentally believe that this war will revitalize religion worldwide because of that (while keeping science and technology extremely relevant, of course).

Everyone is always talking about the upcoming 'paradigm shift', I fundamentally believe this war is the paradigm shift.
>>
>>533860048
Famously weak and decentralized neighbors like Spain, Austria, Britain.
>>
File: demographyvallinphg50.png (10 KB, 412x363)
10 KB
10 KB PNG
>>533860067
>turning into "national unified empires" (like Germany and Italy) the French were simply depressed, realising they were barely a great power now

France was still more powerful than most of Europe after the war, yet birth rates plummeted faster than any other European nation because the population came to reflect the values of the revolution, aka liberalism. Abortion especially became the de facto mode of preventing women having to deal with children, and by the time of the Franco-Prussian war France was already seeing the detriments of this ideology when hordes of Germans could pour into France without a mass rising of French men (who had been aborted so women could screw around instead in their primes instead).

>Why was France so densely populated?
It had fertile land and no liberal ideology to suppress birth rates

>>533860350
Much of that time France wasn't actually fighting every single one of those opponents at the same time. For example in say 1794 France wasn't fighting Russia, it was fighting some of the Spanish army in the Pyrenees or some of the Germans on the Rhine, or the low countries in Flanders, etc. It's population was very much an asset and it could send countless unaborted men to fight.

You're right that over time it became less and less of an asset as more highly populated came to enter the various wars, and that could only be offset by the genius of Napoleon and the other beneficiaries of France's royal military academies which certainly were the best in the world at the time. But it's foolish to claim France's population advantage was of no effect.

Anyway I was mostly referring to the pre-Revolutionary wars, which France simply did alright in. Had France actually had astounding military success in the centuries prior to 1789 there would have been no French revolution and France would have been the default ruler of the continent already.
>>
>>533854521
Shame their leaders betrayed them in 1940. Now they are a laughing stock.
>>
File: Quebec.jpg (109 KB, 828x748)
109 KB
109 KB JPG
>>533854603
>>
>>533861091
The people turned their back on the military. A defense of Paris was mounted. The people decided not to fight. Simple as.

I personally think, in hindsight, it was the right decision. It saved countless French lives and the Germans got btfo anyway.
>>
>>533860693
You are probably a jew.
Nobody to the West of Poland will ever fight Russia no matter what. *

* With the possible exception of the UK, depnding on what the judeo-mutts promise them.
>>
>>533860742
>Britain
Significantly weaker than France in every way.
>Austria
As decentralized as they come.
>Spain
Well I grant you that. Sent their fighters over to the new world to loot and pillage they fizzled out pretty fast once the new world gold dried up.
>>
>>533860956
Yeah, I don't know about any of that...
The most interesting part... I have no clue why France was considered to have more fertile land than the rest of Europe. Especially the Northern European plain.
But yeah, up to Russia they probably had more fertile land than anyone else... still does not seem to be the great reason that explains it...
>>
File: rightfulclay.jpg (593 KB, 3157x3369)
593 KB
593 KB JPG
>>533861515
Haha. History repeats itself. This is a historical war.

May I ask you what Napoleon tried to conquer but failed? That Hitler tried to conquer but failed as well?

Russia has it coming. A rallying cry more than anything else if you read the history books. A reason to rally behind us as well, as we come at them from the East.
>>
>>533860693

Its funny because I can perfectly imagine a bunch of 20 years old saying these very same lines in 1914 in a Cafe in Berlin, Paris, London or Rome whole sipping their drinks and thinking about enlisting, believing it would be a fun thing to do and have a tale or two to tell to the lads once they come back home
>>
>>533861519
Spain was decentralised and highly divided internally.
And over extended globally: It was not just the Americas, it was also Belgium and Southern Italy and at a time Northern Italy and the NEtherlands too...

Resulting in this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantastic_War
>>
File: iran_physical_map.gif (840 KB, 2200x3113)
840 KB
840 KB GIF
>>533861726
wrong. They would be talking about the reasons why ww1 or ww2 started: geneologies and genetics. They would be trying to control and expand on what they've developed with their collective generations, instead of realizing something that Americans innately know: we are all here for each other. You and I, and every race contribute something equally to a collective race called humanity. And when a call is made for the Earth, then the Earth is who answers.
>>
>>533861675
I think you have severe problems, anon.
Either seek help or be more clear.
>>
>>533860669
Way to completely misunderstand the meme.
>>
File: 494943.jpg (84 KB, 800x600)
84 KB
84 KB JPG
>>533860956
The HRE had over 40 millions inhabitants at the time, so even if Russia wasn't part of the First coalition it was still 40+10+8+10 (68 millions) vs France's 26 millions.
Then you can add the Netherlands, Portugal, Naples...
The reason we were able to compete is because total population wasn't that relevant before the advent of mass conscription.
That's why making your entire argument revolve around it is shit.
Total population size didn't proportionally translate into army size.
Prussia for exemple had a much larger army than some countries with a higher population, like Britain.

>Anyway I was mostly referring to the pre-Revolutionary wars, which France simply did alright in. Had France actually had astounding military success in the centuries prior to 1789 there would have been no French revolution and France would have been the default ruler of the continent already.
France was doing fine for a country routinely pinned against massive coalition.
Obviously it wasn't dominant like between 1792 and 1814, but being able to stalemate with massive international coalitions on its own and slowly stealing German lands in the process is still a pretty good record.
>>
File: 963771.jpg (59 KB, 750x445)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>533861907
I think you are scared. You are scared because you know that I'm correct. That is what this is becoming.

we'll see how long your isolationism lasts. America tried that in ww2 remember?
>>
>>533861857
>realizing something that Americans innately know: we are all here for each other. You and I, and every race contribute something equally to a collective race called humanity.

Damn, this is either great bait or you're truly are subhuman.
Probably the later.
>>
File: ba8o14fmz9zc1.png (1.1 MB, 6800x4400)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB PNG
>>533861674
France has good soil, sea access, and unlike Eastern Europe wasn't plagued by marauding Turkic/Mongol tribes. I didn't think that was controversial or arcane knowledge.
>>
>>533861907
>May I ask you what Napoleon tried to conquer but failed? That Hitler tried to conquer but failed as well?
It's Russia you retard. That's what I was saying...
>>
>>533861976
Seek help.
>>
>>533855333
>>533854894
>>533854739
it's literally just concentrated in Montreal
one city
other provinces or other countries can't say the same
stop seething and look at yourself
>>
>>533861998
Americans work with more races than any other country. Sure we are filled with the Eternal Anglo, but they are much more understanding than any other country.

They control wealth, yes, but you have opportunities no matter who you are in America. that's why everyone is obsessed with America.
>>
>>533854308
>top
Christian monarch France
>bottom
Everything since the revolution
>>
File: 5ea.jpg (165 KB, 950x1227)
165 KB
165 KB JPG
>>533862038
See the post directly above yours, dumbass.
>>
>>533861972
You agree that even the non military population is a valuable resource, no?

So yeah, total population probably matters even more than military recruits, numbers, what have you.
>>
File: poeticjustice.jpg (165 KB, 1280x748)
165 KB
165 KB JPG
>>533862087
Also in America more than anywhere else you get the 'racial temperments' of white people. I think other races fundamentally understand whites because they aren't imposing themselves on other races. They just understand.

white people like to control shit that's just innately understood by all races, and there's nothing wrong about it, and there's nothing unjust unlike colonial Europe, where they impose this sort of understanding on others.

Success is earned in America, and that is the filter.
>>
>>533862156
Obviously a bigger population can in theory mean you're richer, have more resources...etc, but it isn't automatically the case.
Same as with pre-conscription era army size, this isn't something that is automatically proportional.
>>
>>533862011
Look at the fucking Ukraine, though!
Look at that massive prime farm from Belarus (Poland?) to Mongolia.
How come Britain's population exploded with the Industrial Revolution?
Something similar must have happened in France at a given time.
France was never a major power before 1640.

>But muh Charlesmagne!
Even that was centered in Austrasia, Germanic land.
>>
>>533862024
So?
You were saying more than that. Only that is what 1% 2% of what you were trying to convey?

>>533862087
Nobody is obsessed with muttmerica.
Your abomination is going under, thankfully.
Once the dollar is no longer the world reserve currency you literally have nothing else... if you think the 90s were hard for Russia wait to see what's in the cards for Muttmerica in the next 30 years, probably 20...
>>
>>533862287
>France was never a major power before 1640.

Kek
Who were the top 5 major powers of Europe in the year 1500 in your reality?
And in the year 1450?
And in 1200?
>>
>>533854308
Free mason killed France in 1789 with their masonic coup d'état but yeah it used to be the most based country on earth long time ago.
>>
>>533862221
>>533862087
Finally, what is completely dying in America is the kind of generated, controlled guilt and oppression of other whites by the whites in power under the guise of rage or anger kept within.

These sorts of things are meaningless anyway and only serve to separate people from themselves. It is a relic of a former age when the different European phenotypes (i.e. the Puritan sects from Greenland/Britain in New England) and the swarthy immigrants like Germans and French in the south, who would identify as Democrat and Republican respectively.

That is now fading, and thank God. You will never again see anyone worrying about preserving Red Hair or preserving their heritage because the future embraces people as they are, and this necessarily means that likely most white people will still breed with white people, but other races will just understand how they really are, instead of keeping that locked up inside.
>>
>>533854308
are there any whites left in france or has it been completely taken over by arab muslims and africans
>>
File: 1663425818478956.jpg (105 KB, 827x828)
105 KB
105 KB JPG
>>533854308
France is judeo-masonic meme republic like all others, there's over 170 of them. It's not special. The "french" revolution was a complete fraud.
>>
File: 73fild.jpg (58 KB, 640x480)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>533854308
You can still find these French WW2 artifacts in excellent condition.
>>
>>533858490
I'm sorry are you implying you're anyone's better?
>>
>>533862635
It's about 70% white right now
But keep in mind that a large share of France's population is old, and a large share of the whites are these boomers.

Among the population below 25, there are probably about 50% of whites.
>>
>>533861972
>The HRE had over 40 millions inhabitants at the time

but was not a unified state, so it's not like Franc ever actually faced a German state backed by 40 million people in that period.

> before the advent of mass conscription.

there was always regional conscription though, and France could rely on that, even if it couldn't rely on a universal conscription of the entire nation.

>Total population size didn't proportionally translate into army size

>Prussia for example had a much larger army than some countries with a higher population

It generally does, unless a smaller richer state can afford to pay for foreign mercenaries or like Prussia, pay for/kidnap foreigners and enslave them to use them as meatshields. Prussia used the rest of Germany as a pool for impressment. of military age males.

>France was doing fine for a country routinely pinned against massive coalition.

That was my point, France just did "ok" prior to the Revolutionary Wars. If they had been actual world beaters they would have been hegemons of Europe, and not just made moderate gains against a very fractured Germany/Italy over a few centuries.

Also France was not *always* against huge coalitions, for example in the War of the Austrian succession, it had Spain and Prussia on its side, in the Seven Years' War it had Russia and Austria on its side.

But even when France did have decent success like taking the low countries in the Austrian Succession, the regime made braindead mistakes like giving it back to the Hapsburgs because Louis XV said he was "a king not a shopkeeper"

>>533862287
Ukraine was getting raped by Turks for centuries
>>
>>533862461
I apologise. I meant the dominant power.
>>
>>533861519
Spain fills me with sorrow
They acquired so much gold and were so obscenely wealthy, but their nobility was literally and metaphorically retarded and blew it all.
The fact it could go from the defacto richest nation in the world to the poorest western european nation (only above portugal) is mind blowing.
>>
>>533854308
Sort of, France was basically unstoppable until 1870, then just got completely humiliated for the next few major wars in embarrasing ways.
>>
>>533862974
A cautionary tale about cousin fucking.
>>
>>533854308
yeah france was pretty cracked alongside britain. They were the single greatest landpower in europe for basically all of the middle ages and the early modern period and only finally got g-checked by the germans in 1876. The reasons are actually pretty simple, they had a very large population, incredibly fertile soil and strong natural borders everywhere except belgium.
>>
>>533862925
>Ukraine was getting raped by Turks for centuries

Sort of, yes.
But Kiev was always Russian. It was even the first Russian city.
Turks mostly just raided in the Summer or something, nothing that actually prevented the development of advanced agriculture.
There was always agriculture in Ukraine.

Also I don't think Prussia ever used other Germans as conscripts in their army. At least not until they conquered those other Germans.

And France was the hegemon of Europe from 1640 to 1789 - although some say 1815 - when they decided to retardedly declare war to the entire world and even God.
>>
>>533862974
You have no idea what you're talking about dumb mutt!
Please explain how their nobility was retarded and "blew it all"?

Spain only became poor because of you jews.
>>
>>533863169
correction, franco-prussian war was 1870
people also forget that much of why france lost WW2 was entirely due to domestic political infighting, which doesn't make it any less humiliating, but it at least explains what happened, and it certainly wasn't due to any cowardice on behalf of the french (which is a filthy american lie). I fucking despise america btw
>>
File: FrenchVictories1800s.png (75 KB, 419x554)
75 KB
75 KB PNG
>>533858840
Please learn the definition of an armistice before posting about military history again.
>>533859116
They literally recovered in the span of a decade and mogged half the world.
>>
>>533860067
France was the first country to do its demographic transition, and the only one to do so before the industrial revolution. Too soon really.
>>
>>533863254
>Please explain how their nobility was retarded and "blew it all"?
Retarded capital and economic controls in their colonies that resulted in mass revolution post Napoleonic war.
>>
>>533861519
>>533860048
>france wasn't stronger than all of its neighbours, its neighbours were all just weaker than it!
>>
>>533862044
>aktualment it’s only the cities where the votes are, us pure linge bumpkins in the countryside hate blacks and fuck our cousins to maintain our ethnic purity
>>
>>533863169
>the reasons are actually pretty simple
Yes, for simple minds.
>>
>>533855765
>Says a provincial party should run outside of its province
>obviously conflated the BQ (federal) and PQ (provincial)
>doesn't know they aren't the same entity
>they simply overlap on a few points
>Tell others they missed his point
>Get upset when (rightfully) called a retard
Just take the L, bro.
>>
>>533863297
just scratch the Korean campaign from the list
>>533863054
The tenacity of the French soldiers that led to their victory during WW1 was glorious not humiliating. What was ridiculous was them getting fooled by their own government into attacking Germany again 20 years later.
>>
>>533863577
encule j'explique de facon simple, si tu veux un essai va sur reddit
>>
>>533863362
You are a fucking moron.
A shitskin.
And likely one of those freemasons / jews I was talking about.

There was no revolution in Spanish America while there was a King in Spain.
Unlike in JSA.
Make of that you will.
>>
>>533863323
Lol Will you explain to me what that demographic transition was or are you just going to call me a lazy nigger?

I think you're just bullshitting me.
>>
>>533863401
Who are you quoting? The point was this military mythos of unbeatable grande armee with endless victories when majority comes from curb stomping small German city-states to the ground.
>>
>>533861091
No you fucking zogrot, for once they listened : frogs above all wanted no war, and didn't mind a nazi government.
It was the smart play to surrender. Where we fucked up is by not joining Nazi Germany when they needed help (we gave few regiments, but not nearly enough), but it wouldn't have changed the end result anyway.
It's you who betrayed the white world, only to serve jewish interests, as always.
>>
why did WWI have to happen bros? It makes me so sad, I think about it way more often than about the Roman Empire...
>>
>>533863763
Not a essay, if you want to get a clue you look at something like this, not reddit or nu/pol/.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=9nKW9Zof1Fc
>>
>>533864129
Because muh alliances and too big and hollowed empires.
>>
>>533863297
Voulet-Chanoine Mission

Kek
I'd rather class this one in the long list of black on black crimes
>>
>>533864129
Is it like in France where literally every single village have monuments to the deads from WWI? It was such an unnecessary onslaught. I myself lost my two great-gramps in the Chemin des Dames (they died one week apart in the same trench lol).

Pic rel, we have those in each single one of our 36,000 municipality. Usually they are used as weed smoking spots for arabs & nigger youths.
>>
>>533859116
No it was WW1 who killed the french fighting spirit, this war deeply buck-broke our psyche. Something was never the same after that.
>>
>>533864458
there are a bunch, my little town has two small memorials but I've seen nothing like your pic here



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.