Thanks for baking.

Previous >>533767292

>>533870192
>these people think
Rather feel. Their own actions are good/sane/justified, other's different actions aren't. Professor or not. Lack of training against such biases.

>>533870628
You're right, they dont think. And I am not even sure if it is really feeling either, they adjust to what tentatively makes the most sense to someone like themselves in a theory of mind way. They craft the character on the entire basis of what they think someone like them would do. Which is why they end up being such a stereotype, like say if some Tesla gets damaged and you see the woman who did it looks literally like a woke carricature or the boomers who vote Trump wearing Oakleys. This is also why I think nigger women have become so disgusting in the US, the narratives they have to choose from basically are only insufferable templates nowadays so they overwhelmingly develop into horrible people

By fucking the templates a society has you really destroy a people since when they have poor choices as templates they go out ruin the social climate and in turn also foster both the growth of opposing horrible templates on the other side. For example I have never heard men say such negative stuff as they do today with radical feminism. 10-15 years ago most dudes were kind of middle of the road, now you have guys who use the cuddlefish beta strategy as well as those who are spiteful.

>>533871207
What the fuck is the "cuddlefish beta strategy?"

>>533870941
I speculate that it's especially prevalent among those who're into status games. "Better than you" or "more right than you." Mostly a middle class thing. Credentials, possessions, status (general and peer groups).
Said professor operates with the academia mindset: bicycle = good, car = bad, watches = gaudy rich peoples stuff. A €15,000 Antarctica vacation (educational, experiencing climate change directly) would make complete sense to him.

>>533871207
>templates
Interesting wording, yes.

>>533871752
Cute and harmless doormat. :3

>>533871752
A performative male who acts extremely agreeable to present himself as harmless to lefty women in order to be considered worthy of sexual intercourse only to be rejected by them. They are the type who rave on about men being problematic or making statements such as
> heterosexual relationships are dangerous for women
Basically they attempt to signal being pre-henpicked in order to make themselves appear as pre-vetted safe option. Especially if black, arab or hispanic they have the tendency to murder women if their overt niceness is taken advantage of since they consider taking their offer equals to agreeing to their TOS in an unspoken fashion

>>533871777
>I speculate that it's especially prevalent among those who're into status games. "Better than you" or "more right than you." Mostly a middle class thing. Credentials, possessions, status (general and peer groups).
>Said professor operates with the academia mindset: bicycle = good, car = bad, watches = gaudy rich peoples stuff. A €15,000 Antarctica vacation (educational, experiencing climate change directly) would make complete sense to him.
Yeah, agreed. This is how they operate. The same guy has no issues spending more money on an e-car than a Mercedes
> it is about the technology
It also show how they can switch (both sides) code since suddenly Tesla went from a woke brand to an anti-woke one. My mind cannot be moved like that. I know most people would like to believe this about themselves but I am truely Machiavellian to my utter genetic core, shit doesnt work on me.

>>533871777
>Interesting wording, yes.
You can see that easily. Like 90% of the women who fuck niggers can be identified just by looking at them, same with the Asian women who only date White guys. They are incredibly predictable. Goes for men too, perhaps even moreso since most men lack both subtleness and effort. The template thing is really a thing. Not saying it works every time, but on most people it does work every time. Even phenotypically there are some tells. For example I found that most people who look like myself usually are successful and dark triad adjacent.

File: linkes-kulturpublikum.jpg (451 KB, 2048x1536)

451 KB JPG

>>533872375
>switch (both sides) code
Swarm synchronization... :)

>>533872827
>identified just by looking at them
True. Style and mannerisms follow those codes. That's why it's often so easy to deduce from 1-3 features the entire complex one belongs to. Those who have their features all over the place (likes feminism, but also like nuclear power) are in a difficult situation, hated by both.
>phenotypically
Amazing, isn't it? Knowing one shouldn't be too deterministic here, but books like "Körperbau und Charakter" (E. Kretschmer) are great stuff. Even have a print version, but online copies are available. Produces also several chuckles.

https://annas-archive.gl/search?index=&page=1&sort=&display=&q=K%C3%B6rperbau+und+Charakter

>>533874337
I have grown to accept that thinking for oneself is "not the normal thing to do". It is about accepting one of several presented narratives and sticking with that, at most switching to one deemed holding better future (or in general upside) potential. This is why many people on the right still are stupid and not these great free thinkers they imagine themselves to be. Also why I have doubts about the findings of people like say "the jolly heretic" since he overtly is focused on what is "normal" which imho as pointed out earlier is largely foreign-determined thus a poor outcome to focus on for those seeking outlier returns.
> all over the place
Would assume that a good bunch of them are larpers, most conservative women for sure are, many of them are actually more feminist than middle of the road apolitical women, they just see conservatives being more close aligned with postive long-term outcomes for themselves but if you scratch them you soon will find that that presumed gold bar really was just very thinly coated tungsten.
> book
Downloaded

>>533874337
Also I hate to be that guy but notice how many of them are blondes. I have long presumed that Nordic people due to their climate have been selected to be extremely socialist and agreeable as they fear not being able to survive without "the group". Law of Jante plays into that as well, an expression of this, not an explanation for it. Basically they have to go through a selection event to shed these traits and the modern urban monoculture (wokeness) is said selection event.

Thus the entire
> I am against the current thing
Is really a joke since both the position for it as well as against it are largely progammed into the template, not produced by genuine research

>>533875022
>why many people on the right still are stupid and not these great free thinkers
All sides are farmed like cattle. And all sides' thought leaders are pretty open about it, though the wording can be flowery. Whether the masses need strong leaders or organic intellectuals or divinely inspired preachers.
>Downloaded
I've got a 1930s edition. Postwar editions are perhaps toned down.

>>533875255
Swarm behavior and group dynamics isn't a Nordic "invention" though.

>>533875022
>most conservative women for sure are,
The higher the social class, the more opportunistic are they. E.g. leading CDU women.

>>533875963
Imho the best women are apolitical to mild lefty ones. The worst are conservative larpers and radical feminists (who unaware to it themselves share much of their ideology)

>>533875740
>Swarm behavior and group dynamics isn't a Nordic "invention" though.
I mean an extreme need for social calibration in almost every life aspect. Even much of the resistance are the same way, just with natsoc flavor. It is why I also criticize national socialism. Imho it is an enormous desire to be managed so to speak out of survival fear. You mainly find that with East Asians and Nordics. They advocate currently for systems that are actually bad for them fiscally even. Other groups do it because they see themselves as net benefactors monetarily-speaking, not because they desire to be managed
The only group who doesnt really integrate into these patterns but look similar seem to be the Baltics and many Slavs who both seem to be unwilling and incapable of creating Nordic-esque systems. Thus I assume its really genetic selection in some way that is behind it.

You can see how for example a lot of older leftoid women became very tight-lipped once the tranny shit came up. Or how they are really getting angry at men using surrogates. And ofc my favorite topic how they eschew age gaps (but at the same time disproportionally have been in them out of a need for status; "it is different when I do it"). Seriously Wagenknecht, Strack-Zimmermann, Bärbel Bas they all have been or are with much older dudes. And we arent talking 10-12 years here

>>533876282
Do you see a structural difference between "managed by" the community (Nordics) or the clan (Global South)?
And why do you seem to think that Nordics are conformists and the others are more freer spirits when individualism is a rather Germanic thing?

File: MurderOfCats.jpg (22 KB, 540x160)

22 KB JPG

>>533870137
May I offer up "puddle" to describe a group of cats consisting of a single cat.

>>533877067
> Do you see a structural difference between "managed by" the community (Nordics) or the clan (Global South)?
One kind of lowkey knows they benefit financially, the other things going along is good as the focus is on it being stable. For the same reason welfare systems dont work in the global south, it would get plundered on day 1. See jeet behavior and tragedy of commons (with brownoids)
>And why do you seem to think that Nordics are conformists and the others are more freer spirits when individualism is a rather Germanic thing?
Those seem to be outlier men who over time as they gain power in society, become less radical, the power paradox. Basically our own financial success in capitalism cucks us and since we are the only ones who can muster up resistance or own ideas "nothing ever happens" until the system collapses under its own weight

File: boomer-news.png (51 KB, 609x279)

51 KB PNG

>>533877708
Have a hard time to discuss this, it's too vague and binary at the same time. Think we don't share the same conceptual framework here. Happens almost every time we touch this. It usually ends with me saying that we norfies aren't that bad but need an immune system against freeloaders.

>>533878283
I just assume that many normies seem to believe handing power off to be managed is the best thing to deal with abstract danger they assume to be omnipresent while outlier men think they themselves can do better. Hence a Nordic-adjacent group, the Anglo, could develop individualism but at the same time the average citizen is a gigacuck.

File: diy_mongolian_basket_weaving.png (78 KB, 228x412)

78 KB PNG

>>533878448
Not sure how to explain it. Norfies have community-oriented individualism. Only later propaganda atomized them, hijacking the individualism to neglect the community. It's not an Anglo invention either.
But can we have a different topic? We had this several time and made no progress.

>>533879013
ok but I am gone for 30-45 minutes to eat breakfasterino

>>533879617
I'm done with my work and realized that I'm pretty tired. Let's continue later this day. Enjoy your breakfast.

>>533879813
cu

I am back