I couldnt explain why i care if my kids are related to me
>>533870311>if my kids are related to me?What like the kids you're raising? If they're your kids, wouldn't they be related to you
>>533870311If you weren't able to articulate that yourself, it's probably for the best if they aren't related to you.
>>533870311you don't have any kids
>>533870311Men who pump and dump are more likely to produce criminals. Crime and violent behavior and dishonesty are genetic traits.
It's a weird trend but irl leftists always win arguments but online the rightists always seem to win. I can't really explain why this happens.
>>533870311Say it's about informed consent.
>>533870599Lol simple. Right wing arguments generally rely on facts and it's hard to quickly articulate a bunch of numbers and statistics while left wing arguments rely on calling you a bigot or racist which you don't need to think about at all.
>>533870599Because online one can just parrot social media and FOX news talking points. Yet in real life VS anyone educated those same point fall apart. Being there is a huge difference between understanding an issue and just barfing up a zinger you heard on fox.
>>533870861So explain the winning argument of why you shouldn't care that your kids are related to you and watch me fucking destroy you...
>>533870311>couldnt explain why i care if my kids are related to meThis has to be bait lol
>your kidsbut they're not yours
>>533870311There's nothing inherently wrong with raising another person's kid if it's like an orphan or the parents can't take care of them. The problem is more that the system is making having a kid not even an option for most guys and isntead they are told they can raise somebody else's kid. It's like a fucking servile slave role for low-status men. I don't know how any self-respecting guy could be a stepfather unless they are single parent.
>>533870861Let's go faggot... What's wrong need time to Google the things you pretend to think?
>>533870311thats trying to rationalize instincts/pathos, oxymoronic because rationalism is posthocif you want to explain why you have a certain pathos you can do it through evolutionary logic, obviously ppl who dont care about their genes dont reproduce
>>533870311You fucked up when you accepted their framework “obvious truth needs to justified.” Should’ve just told them to fuck off with a chuckle
>>533871036This meme is my biggest pet peeve.“Dating single mothers is totally fine IF you’re a single parent.”Have you ever met a woman? That’s even worse than if you have no children. She will try destroy your children if you blend a household with your and her children.
>>533870861Kek that's what I thought pussy. Shut your faggot mouth. Your dumb nigger bullshit doesn't play here.
>>533870599Guys on the right win both forms of discussion handily and leftists respond with sputtering rage and then make posts like yours pretending they won.Just look at Charlie Kirk - btfo leftists for literal years, to the point that leftists got so mad they replied with violence instead of words and murdered him. At that point your ideology has completely failed and your only future relevance extends exclusively out of how many people you can get away with harming.
>>533870311>>533871478Here, lets chatgpt some reasons:1. Evolutionary and Genetic Self-Interest (Inclusive Fitness)Just goes without saying I want my genes to pass on, not your genes, not their genes; my genes.2. Health and Medical TransparencyGenetic compatibility that influences organ donations, blood donations, medicine, and predictability of ailments3. Psychological and Identity DevelopmentAttachment and bonding with your biological children is innate and genetic, it'll never be the same reflex with a child or parent that isn't yoursThe child has their place in the world, there is no "who am I?"4. Family Dynamics and Relational StabilityKnowing your child is yours creates more stable families and resolves many potential quagmires especially when it comes to competing inheritance or inverse caretaking (child taking care of parents)5. Predictability of Traits and CompatibilityYou know what you are like, what your parents are like, and what your children will probably be like. It's all an extension of the same genetic lineage and is reasonably predictable and reliable6. Practical and Societal RealitiesLaws and social mores in general just work better with real genetically related children and families, you get respect, there are no quiet whispers behind your back, the legal structures handle issues better, and it fits the broader culture betterThe trouble really is that the leftist uses, "Why do you care if your kids are related to you" as a rhetorical argument. It takes time to actually think and consider, which most people haven't done, it's just natural to care for your own kids, why do you have to consider whether you should care for them over someone else's children.Now see, the leftist isn't interested in an actual discussion here. This is a spell they cast to trip you up and that's its only purpose. Whatever you say doesn't matter, because you're talking to a demon that just uses words to manipulate people.
>>533874011You're also fucking stupid. Absolutely pathetic. Ai cucks are the worst
because genes mattermaybe yours don't though since you're retarded
Enjoy quibbling amongst your dumb selves faggots. This website contains the dumbest people on the Internet. Reddit might be faggots but you niggers are actually retarded
>>533874316>>533874442eat shit retard lmao
>>533870599>>533870311A big leftie skill is pretending axioms have no purpose>why do you care if your kids are related to you?>why is theft bad?>why is putting your kids on hormone blockers bad?They come out with arguments you couldn't fathom a real person unironically holding, so you might get lost in the moment. Sophists will always mog well-meaning people in debates.
>Explain why you like eating red meat>Now explain why you want to have sex with a female>OK now explain why you don't want to die????Don't talk to these kinds of people.
>>533870311How were you unable to argue the concept of homophily?
>>533871036I wouldn't even care at all in theory, nothing wrong with raising kids if you don't raise them like a zogbot, it's even fun.But it's not something I'd be guilted into or anything.
>>533874614They're all things you mostly don't think about.And it takes time to think about the situation and understand what is really the problem, which is not something leftists can ever do, and not something 99% of the population can do on the spot in a snap. It takes time to consider the implications and most people don't think that deeply about the axioms they've taken for granted.Take theft for example: A good way to understand theft is that it's the theft of your life. You had to spend time and effort to earn money to buy something, or to make it. Someone stealing that "doesn't hurt you" in the immediate physical sense, but it really is like some took a slice of your time/life from you. Part of your finite existence and toil became nothing.Which is why it's ok to take someone else's life to prevent them taking some of yours. Especially in cases where the risk of them taking your life extends further than your spent time, but directly to all your future time.This is of course, fundamentally what prison is about. To take someone's finite life as a punishment for their bad actions. It's effectively reciprocal punishment, though we take more from the criminal than he takes from others to encourage him not to do it again.
