[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1668032669539973.png (1.49 MB, 968x1182)
1.49 MB PNG
Why is free healthcare considered common sense by everyone besides American right wingers who prefer sending money to Israel?
>>
>>533905663
nuffin's free
>>
>>533905663
Free healthcare is no healthcare.

t. californian
>>
>>533905663
>>533905706
Take care of your own health you retarded fat bag of shit
>>
>>533905663
Because it's more important that we pay for Israel's free healthcare than take care of ourselves. The bible says so. You lost tranny.
>>
>>533905663
>Why is free healthcare considered common sense
First off, it's not free. Second, it's considered common sense because they're idiots who trust their governments, who are happy to implement "death panels" and assisted suicide.
>>
>>533905663
The US's demographics render decent public projects unfeasible. See Somali daycares.
>>
>>533905663
You will be taxed half your salary so 50m illegals can get free medical. Here we have planes filled with chinks who solely come here to give birth for free and return home after
>>
>>533905663
Free healthcare means I put responsibility for my health to retards in gov.
With private system I can choose the best option for me since companies will try to anything to not lose its clients to other competitors
>>
>>533905663
Let's see if it stays free when the US leaves NATO
>>
golems don't need repairs, when they get broken you just throw them away
>>
>>533905663
i honestly think the concept is good. i just don't want that money to be spent on niggers, that is all
>>
File: FreeHealthcare.png (377 KB, 1112x1777)
377 KB PNG
>>533905663
Because America is filled with Americans.
You can't give universal healthcare to Americans.
>>
>>533905663
I don’t trust the (((government))) to handle my money for me
>>
>>533905663
Because of zog. You already know this.
>>
>>533905663
Those are not mutually exclusive as the costs of the former completely eclipse the costs of the latter, revealing you to be a nugger desperate to leech off western social services.

And let's be real that's the heart of the issue: Can't genuinely make it better here until we stop the vermin these systems keep attracting, that's like trying to mop up a flood without stemming the flow.
>>
File: 1760022372918842.jpg (572 KB, 1125x1408)
572 KB JPG
>>533905706
>healthcare isn't free
>that's why we must send ten times the amount of money to israel
Not having universal healthcare is actually costing the USA more, and they sen money to Israel on top of that. It's only to prop up the insurance market. They're no actual benefit to anyone but shareholders.

It's exactly how milk companies tricked everyone into thinking you need to chug milk like a lunatic. Or how tobacco companies made people think you had to smoke to be cool and manly. Or how oil companies keep claiming gas is the only useful energy source and that it's clean.

Meat production companies reacted to other companies offering onions alternatives and were rising up as competitors, so they made paid ads saying onions makes you gay. Now retards think onions makes you gay. The same meat producers are now also providing onions alternatives because they don't actually care. They just wanted to snuff out competition.

It's room temperature IQ level advertising. It's insane how effective it works. Clean energy has already overtaken oil and coal power, but oil companies can just say "nuh-uh" and then brainlets will just repeat "nuh-uh!"
>>
>>533905663
It's not free though that's what you don't understand and it's also bad.
>>
First get rid of the laws that make it insanely expensive. And when that's solved, see if people still want to socialize it. But first make it fucking functional, and don't act like more government control is the solution to problems that the government created.

The downside of socializing it is that it will be managed by bureaucrats, and as efficient as every govt run agency, and no one will be able to change providers. The upside is that poor people will still be able to access it. Is it worth it? Idk, it could unironically be. But in the US I'd say getting rid of the root of the problem is more urgent than thinking about this.
>>
>>533905663
Do all niggers and Muslims and other illegal immigrants deserve free health care?
>>
>>533905946
Honestly man if you aren't trolling and unironically think this, you can't be helped. You don't know how anything about society works and go through life just absorbing propaganda.
>>
>>533906842
Yeah I think obamacare made it illegal for insurance companies to compete with Healthcare along state lines or something like that and then noone could afford health insurance anymore and it was cheaper to just get fined for not having Healthcare.
>>
>>533905663
They would rather die of racism
>>
>>533905663
Because people don't understand that healthcare is a service with near infinite demand, so access to the supply must be limited in some way.
The American system does this semi-directly with money via insurance with some exceptions for not denying emergency care no matter what. This allowed market forces to work as normal, meaning you get very short wait time, but you do have to deal with being able to pay. The actual quality of the care is also very high as the providers are competing on that.
A public healthcare option manages supply with wait times. Since adding providers to the system is a permanent increase in government spending, it is often avoided so those wait times increase. Additionally since the providers don't have to deal with the market, there is less focus on quality. The benefit is the cost is pushed directly onto the consumer and the drug prices are cheaper (this may be changing a bit with the Trump deals with the pharma companies last year). Consumers not seeing the cost means they do try to always do preventative care which is good both health and overall cost wise.
>>
>>533906934
I looked up how it works and it seems like its insane, they make it so your employer has to buy it for you, so obviously your employer won't care about quality, and the insurances don't even have to deliver.

Plus the patents causing insane med prices.

Plus the fact there's very few medicine school, because the govenrment doesn't allow more, so doctors can be rich. Obviously, the downside of making doctors rich is people can't afford them.

I think there's even more but I don't remember right now. It's a system that's just a mess of laws to fix problems they created previously, and keep fixing with more laws as they go.

They can make it affordable btw. It is affordable and high quality in other countries where it's private. They just have to remove those laws.
>>
>>533906762
i walk into hospital, I get treated, they give me a bill, I say "no," nothing happens

you can just not pay for things
>>
>>533907127
>gets everyone hooked on legal opioids for a broken toe
>quality care
lmao
>>
File: botspam free healthcare 3.png (2.22 MB, 1366x5486)
2.22 MB PNG
>Look, mom, I posted in that thread again!
>>
>>533907298
You do realize all the opioid addictions were because doctors were trying to optimize for the patient not experiencing pain at all during their recovery right? It was a stupid solution that has ended up killing people, but it was trying to make healthcare better.
Wouldn't you want recovery after a surgery not hurt at all if there weren't downsides?
>>
>>533907441
he probably thinks its a big gotcha

commies still think that the government can create everything people need by decree, if only big businesses allowed it, and that right wingers support not doing it only because we think we'll be one of the billionaires one day, or something
>>
>>533907582
Those "doctors" simply pumped their patients full of drugs because they didn't want to deal with them while receiving fat paychecks from pharma companies.
It's fucking and corrupt retarded is what it is you dense mofo.
>>
>>533907763
But OP is going to come back to this thread this time, right?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.