>>533917486>On a sunny day, a 600-800 watt system can supply up to 50% of a family's daily electricity consumption, particularly covering "baseload" usage such as refrigerators, routers, and standby devices.
>>533917486Pretty cool. You can also use the flat roof of the this type of building for panels too.
>>533917486>Decommission nuclear power plants>Use solar panels inefficiently>Buy Russian oilWhat was supposed to impressive about all this?
>>533918286Not starting a retarded war with iran
>>533918461I'm pretty sure that wasn't a realistic option for Germany and I'm quite sure that a nuclear exchange between Iran and Israel would have been more disruptive to the German economy than the US economy but yeah, good job on not starting a war you weren't logistically capable of starting.
>>533917486God i love germans
>>533917486Now show the pods on the north side retard.
>>533918984>It's real in my head
>>533917486Sweet commie block.
>>533917564It's cool as passive energy. It's just a shame that a 100W solar panel costs around $50-60, making it not viable.
>>533919162You're totally right, how could I be so foolish? Any reasonable person would risk their life for Uranium enrichment because they were just that concerned about having materials for medial imaging.
>on a sunny day>Germanylmao
>>533918461You dont have balls to start a war you cuckolds already know this
>>533917564Today from around 12 to 4 I received around 30ct (after surcharges and taxes) for every kWh I consumed (all in all it was 50 to 60 kWh...).If I had had solar on my roof, I would have gotten them for free.So why should I invest in this, again?
