This guy is such a massive faggot
>>533923337Yes.
Not as massive as Posobiec
>>533923337Yes
>>533923337i dont know much about him but from what i understand he is extremely poorly educated on the subjects that he talks about and just projects baseless bigotry
>>533923337Works for a jew, so he'll never admit what the real problem is
'What is a woman' was quite funny to watch.But overall he does have a weird obssession with trans and homosexuals. The Joe Rogan episode kinda revealed that he's a radical as well, out of touch with reality.
>>533923337Most republicans are
>>533923337you seem like a very smart person
>>533923337Most catholics are
>>533923337He was alright during the post-COVID era.I can't fathom wasting time listening to right wing podcasters today though.The jury's out. People find woke shit obnoxious and they're done with it. Calling someone a bigot doesn't get them canceled anymore. We're like back to 2000's level acceptance of racism because the left overdid it.But also, people don't want to live rigid conservative lives either, because conservatives are boring af.
>>533923337oh how michael moore must seeth that walsh achieved more with one movie than he ever did
>>533926625>baseless biotryyou are a soft penised faggot
>>533926896>The Joe Rogan episode kinda revealed that he's a radical as well, out of touch with reality.QRD? I haven't seen it
>>533923337Agreed
>>533926896>he's a radical as well, out of touch with reality.how, just seems like a stock "anything but jesus and fishing is degenerate" christian conservative
>>533923337Reminder: he doesn't attack transwomen because he is pro-common sense, he attacks them because he's a Feminist misandrist.
>>533923337Matt Walsh is the former bassist for the hugely influential duet phantogram? Here is a frame from their most famous of tracks.
>>533923337The funny thing is he’s a looksmaxer. Go look at old photos before he had the beard and hair transplant. Dude looked like a yuppie dork.
>>533926625Faggot>>533928385I made this joke in the yt comments back when Walsh only had 12k subs. It got 3 likes I think.
>>533927859https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I957o08voU0Here is a segmentHe's a radical conservative, which kinda does damage in it's own regard because the overwhelming majority of people wont agree with it, and this kind of stuff just pushes people away.If republicans wants to win they simply need to present themselves as 'normal' since the left is already too radicalized and militant about their norms and values to attract normies.
>>533928577opposing gay marriage is normal, maybe it's uncommon and unpopular but it is normal
>>533928577>radical conservativeno he's a stock christian conservative, how the fuck are swedes even on /pol/ such söy-infused shitlibs?
He's one the best. Doesn't have a high pitched voice like the other right wing grifters.
>>533928932Doing these kind of purity test bullshit is just as radical when it comes from the right as it is when it comes from the left. People generally just wants to be left alone from these ideological battles.
>>533929134>just let us get away with whatever we want
>>533928892>it's uncommon and unpopular but it is normalThis sounds like syntax error to me.Most people dont want government to decide this stuff because it doesnt really contest with any immediate moral boundaries like the abortion or immigration debate. This is just restricting people solely based on principles.
>>533929134opposing gay marriage is not a purity test lmao it's a core christian belief, next you'll be shocked to learn how he "purity tests" on abortionget real
>>533929297Letting people get married is not on the same level as abortion you dumb fuck.I know this is /pol/ but I am arguing from the normie perspective and I can clearly tell you're completely out of touch with reality so there is not point arguing this position with you.
>>533929416>calling others out of touch while describing stock christian conservative as "radical"get the fuck out of here you limp-wristed faggot shitlib
>>533929551If a Finnish party put it on their program to ban gay people from marriage and that marriage first purpose should be procreation, that party would crash.The fact that you dont understand this is proof that you're a radical out-of-touch chronically 4chan online retard.Or, if you understand this to be the case, then why the fuck are you even arguing with me? This isnt about me and you, it's about what the overwhelming majority of people feels about it.
>>533929739christian conservative is entry level, if you call that radical what do you call people significantly more socially conservative like amish, tradcaths, muslims, hell the conservative lutheran movement in finland is more socially conservative than matt walsh, do you call them ultra mega giga conservatives?words have meanings and dont just exist to satisfy you emotionally, shitlib retard
>>533929943>ultra mega giga conservativesradicals*
>>533929943If it's not radical to ban gays from marriage then why do you think not a single fucking party in your entire political spectrum including those who have social conservative values (such as PS) as their core campaign focus, or parties founded on christian values like KD? Because it would be suicide to do so because normies would instantly reject it.Everything you say is just gibberish because you cannot refute this fact. You're merely projecting what you FEEL isnt radical but you cannot relate to what normies, the overwhelming majority of the average person thinks.
I like him and his dry humor, he's one of the funnier podcasters out there. Certainly funnier than Dave Smith, who's supposed to be a professional comedian. Yeah, he's a coward when it comes to Israel, and some of his takes are retarded, but he's miles more entertaining than most others in his circle.
>>533923337I watched the race movie he made with my ex bf and enjoyed itWish I had seen the what is a woman one
>>533930479you didnt answer the question, do you call muslims, orthodox jews etc giga mega ultra radicals because theyre far more socially conservative than stock christian conservatives, who you already consider radical?swedes are such effeminate faggots its fucking unreal, never reply to me again with your shitlib brainrot
>>533926625It's also rumored he's a closeted diaperfag
>>533930479normies in Sweden might since they see no issue with men getting fucked in the ass while migrants move in and rape all their women. A normal society would see that homosexuality is degenerative and disgusting and should not be normalized or encouraged in any way.
>>533930562I should add onto this that this isn't a joke post, I was with a conservative libertarian chaser and he brought me to itFaggot made me pay tho
>>533930591>who you already consider radical?This isnt about me, it's about normies.Get it through your thick skull.I'm projecting what normies feel about the issue and that's what dictates what is radical and what isnt.Radical is when you stray from the general norms and values.And yes, if a muslim founded a political party that openly proclaimed it wants to ban gays from getting married, it would ABSOLUTELY be considered RADICAL you dumb fuck.Not gonna insult your flag cause I like Finns but you're clearly a special speciment of autistic and low IQ as fuck to even comprehend the nature of this debate or the point being made.
>>533930724I can assure you its normies in Finland as well. But yeah lets keep insulting flags because I am right.
>>533926625Hes very low IQ
>>533930837matt walsh is american you fucking retard, you look at his politics in the context of america not in the context of your own personal sodom and gomorrahholy shit im gonna stroke out dealing with this actual faggot, peace out
Diaperfag diaperfag diaperfag
>>533931037So you finally realised it's fucking radical and has nothing to do with me being a Swede since the general consesus in Finland is exactly the same.Good.
>>533923337
>>533923337You know this guy is completely and totally astroturfed, right? Do you understand what that word means?
>>533923337who?
If you're not talking about Israel, you're the problem. Imagine some semi-edgy conservative columnist in a newspaper telling us he's "neutral on Britain" and telling us the founding fathers are "oddly obsessed with Britain" in the 1700s.
