>Starmer refuses to publicly support America invading Iran for Israel >Suddenly his job is in danger over some bullshit nobody outside Westminster cares aboutMakes u think
>>533927272should have kissed kike ass like every normal person on the planet who wants a career.
i know your whole life revolves around obsessing over israel mohammad but even i know keir starmer is the most unpopular pm in bri'ish history
>>533927356That's just what our incredibly zionist owned press wants people to think, rebbe
>>533927436browns really are amazingly retarded
>>533927272HES CAUGHT IN THE LEFTOID TDS TRAPAS A LEFTOID GOVERNMENT OF YUROPISTAN HE IS REQUIRED TO DO THE ORANGEMAN BAD DANCE PUBLICLY SUPPORT IS AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION SINCE BONGISTAN IS QUIETLY SUPPORTING AMERICAN OPERATIONS AS PER USUAL ALONG WITH THE REST OF NATO ASIDE FROM SPAIN WHO HAS FALLEN OFF THE CLIFF INTO TERMINAL COMMUNISM
>>533927272Isn't his king Muslim or something?
it's not a party thing anymore. even the conservatives/reform who initially wanted to play lapdog realised how retarded it was. nobody who steps up would be any more pliant.
>>533927436You know full well Starmer has been unpopular for months and well before any stuff Trump has done or Israel. Starmer is a Fabian fag and married to a jew. Trump is even less popular in the US than Starmer. Don't you know Starmer blocked Andy Burnham from standing in that recent seat Labour lost to the Greens all because Burnham is probably the only Labour Party politician who could challenge Starmer - they really do have no one else.
>>533927272queer saarmar to the gulags
>>533927272>makes u thinkYeahLike imagine having that faggot nonce as your "eLeCtEd LeAdEr"Lmfao
>>533928258Anyone in power would be unpopular, Starmer has improved his popularity by standing up to Trump so it's bizarre to have a coup now.It's obvious electoral suicide for Labour to coup its own leader at this point. The only reason to do so is Israel wants it.
>>533928631>nooo, brittania shall not free itself from the shackles of the shitskin invaderscope mohomo
>>533927272>get elected on a promise to do something about the cost of living>do nothing about the cost of living>instead use your majority to pass increasingly draconian censorship laws no-one asked for>appoint Epstein's pal Mandy to be US ambassador (probably as a reward for helping get rid of Corbyn so he could become leader)>generally govern in a way that's indistinguishable from the previous 14 years of ToriesHis premiership has been a shitshow from day one m8, there's nothing "sudden" about this. He'll hang on to take the blame for the May elections (which will be disastrous for Labour) then he's gone. And it will be well deserved.
>>533928934There's nothing Starmer can do to improve the economy because the public hates any and all economic programs that would actually encourage growth. Anyone would have the same problem.
>>533929050>the public hates any and all economic programs that would actually encourage growthThe public hates mass immigration too, that hasn't stopped successive governments for the last 20 years from just ignoring the issue. The public also hates this Labour government and voters are abandoning them en masse. Might it not be better to try and do something and fail, than to do nothing and fail?
>>533927272Daily Starmer
>>533927272STARMFART IS A POOFTER>kek
>>533927272>have -50 approval rating>party plots to get rid of you Makes u think
>>533929494>The public hates mass immigration too, that hasn't stopped successive governments for the last 20 years from just ignoring the issue.They don't hate it as much as they hate the consequence of stopping it which would fuck the economy.They could have voted for the BNP or UKIP at any time but didn't. The revealed preference of the public particularly the all important boomers is to have high immigration while they grumble about immigrants.
People are tired of being murdered, raped, robbed, and paying for it.
>>533929494>The public also hates this Labour government and voters are abandoning them en masseWhat are the chances of the fucking Greens getting in?And how are they gonna ruin the country if they do.
>>533930402ZeroGreens and Labour will split the same voters on the left like Reform and Tory will split the same voters on the rightThe only possible winners are Labour or Tory as usual
>>533930493>Greens and Labour will split the same voters on the left like Reform and Tory will split the same voters on the rightYou are acting like both Labor and Tory's aren't dead in the water from both their many fuckups.
>>533930037>They could have voted for the BNP or UKIP at any time but didn'tAnd what are they doing now? Not looking so good for the red/blue axis of the neoliberal status quo any more.
>>533930037>>533929494Also reminder that the number of immigrants under Starmer has plungedNo right wing cunts have even noticed because the degree to which they care about immigration has nothing to do with the number of immigrants and everything to do with the number of viral social media stories about rapes promoted by rightwing billionaires
>>533927272Don't you wanna get rid of the guy/s who keep pulling new censorship laws out of their ass?
>>533930628The two party system is stable>>533930751It's going to be funny when retards are reminded yet again that the FPTP system does not reward parties with broad but insubstantial support
>>533927272He's staying until at least 2029.
>>533931013>The two party system is stableIs it? the only people openly voting Labor or Tory now are uninformed Boomers.
>>533930763Please do point me to the Labour policies that caused that dip rather than it just being a result of trends. I'm willing to admit I'm wrong if you can, but I suspect if immigration were to surge again like it did under Boris, Starmer's response would be exactly the same, i.e nothing.>>533931013How about some seat projections? This one has a nice broad range so it's harder for you to accuse of bias or being unrealistic. Still not looking good for Labour, is it?
>>533930037>stopping it which would fuck the economy.It would mean higher wages and lower rents.Young people would be able to buy homes, the horror!I can't believe there are people who still say this kind of bullshit after seeing what's going on in Canada and similar places.
>>533932344>It would mean higher wages and lower rents.Higher wages are bad because they raise the price of goods and services. That's called inflation and most of the public fucking hates inflation.>Young people would be able to buy homes, the horror!That's a declaration of war on the entire boomer class who keep their wealth in their homes. Needless to say, they are reliable voters.
>>533932498Anon, in the 1960's, British newspapers published articles predicting the average person in the year 2020 would be working 10 hours per week. Since afterall, we'd have so many labor saving devices and be so productive. Living standards would drastically rise and we would work less than ever.Instead, all the benefits of mass production have gone to a small handful of like, 100 people, while everyone else is forced to compete against the machines and get their wages driven into the dirt.
>>533932498>they are reliable votersThey're rapidly dying voters. The youngest boomer is 60, the oldest is 80. As a demographic boomers are now less than 20% of the population (both gen x and millennials outnumber them now) and shrinking year by year.
>>533930751>Not looking so good for the red/blue axis of the neoliberal status quo any more.You're going to get the biggest fell for it again award if Reform win
>>533932628>Anon, in the 1960's, British newspapers published articles predicting the average person in the year 2020 would be working 10 hours per week. They were right. People doing fake email jobs probably do less real work than that.>Instead, all the benefits of mass production have gone to a small handful of like, 100 peopleRetard, everyone's benefited.You should try living the same way people lived in the 1960s. No overseas holidays or affordable plane flights.No eating out.No electronic goods.Household goods cost three to six month's wages. Clothing and food costs many times what they cost today.No safety standards on anything. No OSHA. Your car is a steel box designed to kill you on impact.I could go on. The 60s was shit. But hey at least you could afford a house.
>>533927272I get the uncanny valley effect every time I look at his photoWhat's wrong with this face
>>533932927>everyone's benefitedThey work longer than ever, and have less money than ever. They can't even support a family anymore. In reality, we should be working like 15 hours a week and be living like kings. If all these labor saving devices and automated systems were actually working for us, rather than competing against us.
>>533927272But it isn't "sudden" at all? This nigger should have been standing in front of a firing squad ages ago, him and basically most politicians in the UK. He's against the Iran war but he isn't against his own people getting raped and murdered, fuck him.
>>533932927>You should try living the same way people lived in the 1960s. >No overseas holidays or affordable plane flights.>No eating out.>No electronic goods.Anon, this might be news to you in your upper middle class bubble but that's exactly what is happening to the lower classes in the UK right fucking now as a result of the rising cost of rents, utilities and council tax.
>>533933226If you're willing to live a long way from anywhere interesting and never have any fun or go out at all you can support a family very easily. You can give your kids hand me down rags to wear and feed them cheaply. That's what they did 70 years ago.The problem isn't the cost of living, it's your expectation for what your life should be like.
>>533933255Lol no it isn't.The lower classes consists of cunts with fake autism on benefits with £1200 smartphones, large Tiktok followings and Motability Mercedes. Paid for by yours truly.
>>533933408If we had the same earning power as boomers, the minimum wage would be $65/hour today
>>533927272>frens of israellemme guess.LOOK IT UP!!!!Next!!!! also starmy you did okay bro
>>533927356He was way more unpopular last year but the ziobots didn't start calling for his resignation until he refused to send Brits to die for Israel.
>>533927272The damage has already been done
>>533927272this guy already took out a guy for no supporting israel, he is the pro-israel candidate lol.HE TOOK OUT BASED CORBYN!!!
>>533933408>okay, life is hard for the lower classes, but they expect too much>>533933572>life is piss easy for the lower classes, the freeloading cuntsMight have overplayed your hand making these two posts back-to-back.
>>533935565>>okay, life is hard for the lower classes, but they expect too muchthat isn't what I said thoughI said nobody wants to live like they did before mass manufacturing, outsourcing and immigration.
>>533930037>They don't hate it as much as they hate the consequence of stopping it which would fuck the economy.how illegal migration is beneficial for the economy?
>>533927981Kys
>>533927272Starmer is a back seat bitch. He sure supports putting refuelers near them
>>533927272Small hat on ... He's serious
>>533935956in the US it's the whole basis of their cheap farming and buildingover here it props up all kinds of services
>>533928803Like you did? LMAO Obama deported more people than Trump. You fell for it again.
>I don't have the POLITICAL CAPITAL to do popular things people want! I need to do unpopular things people don't want to build up POLITICAL CAPITAL or else I might lose an election or something! Sorry, but there is no alternative.Why are third way neolibs like this?
>>533927272Starmer's job has been in danger since Lord Mandelsohn was arrested over the Memestein Files, you gay retard
>>533927356Bein unpopular doesn't matter that much. Look at Trump, he's hanging in there. Look at any European leader: Utterly despised but they remain in power.
Voting Labour until Putin and Trump both die. Need stability in rough times because i don't much fancy going to war (my knees hurt).
