How would the US react if there actually was a nation wide pornography ban?
>>533949517If porn gets banned then a lot of Jewesses will be out of work. 99% of porn whores are Jews, that’s why they’re so busted usually.
Much kvetching, memeflag.
why is this picture so funny. it's like they're lucid about how ridiculous this whole porn shit is, displaying human sexuality on a fucking screen. they look like normal people here.
>>533949517It's already banned in Idaho. I just turn on a French VPN or listen to soundgasm. Audio porn isn't legally defined or regulated yet.
>>533949517Define pornography
I start getting worried because anything can be labeled as porn now
luckily my state already banned jew porn
>>533949517Men would get angry, some suicidal, and be required to hold rifles and go and die for israel.
>>533949703Project A-ko depicts a nude 16 y/o. I'm sure soon that will be illegal to purchase. It's not porn at all but women are retarded and jealous.
>>533949587Most of the time only the male pornstars are jewish, and the film crew and the people who hold the money but don't appear on the set. The women are mostly non-jewish.
>>533949725Is this actually a thing now?
>>533949825Utah & Idaho you can't load bondagehub even
>>533949782Yeah thats why this shit is so fucking retarded.To me porn is showing intercourse, nothing more.
>>533949837Neither will you, faggot
>>533949517It would be bypassed in sneaky ways; like 1930s prohibition, but with coomers
>>533949854Here in Florida you need VPN for xhamster and pornhub.Unless you wanna do that ID shit but no thanks
>>533949517>How would the US react if there actually was a nation wide pornography ban?there was for about 150 years or more anon. Wasn't until the 1950s it became sorta legal. Stag parties were illegal until then.
>>533949517Goblin ears
>>533949863Then you have films like They Call Her One Eye which does have intercourse but it's not meant to be pornographic and the men are disgusting on purpose. No idea how that's categorized in America. If I loan it to a high school, I suppose I could get charged for distribution of porn to minors even though it's a classic film. Idk.
>>533949517>pornography banAnd somehow, it wouldn't include OnlyFansYou figure that out
>>533949951Weren't stag parties basically like goon caves
>>533949517>How would the US react if there actually was a nation wide pornography ban?Then the next question would be "What IS pornography?"Call it the "stripper-tassel" conundrum.Some states forbid nudity, so they wear tassels to cover up the nipple and NOT call it nudity.....so if the US does ban porn, it'll be a matter of how far back the goalpost gets pushed to not call it pornography?And even if it results in "silhouette porn", where you just see a shadowy outline 'simulating' sex, would the moral-authorities see any sexual 'act' or implication as pornography?If anything a porn "ban" will just make porn kino again to be honest.Being of the VHS era myself, being 15 years old and discovering my dad's porn stash. I had more 'fun' with porn then than the 4k solo shit that on the internet.... it'll be grassroot experience all over again, if porn gets banned and we all go back to physical media to barter around and watch in underground theatres again, like the old days....tldr, "if there is a porn ban, we'll adapt."
>>533949517I'm as anti porn as the next nigger but who am I to decide how a man gets his nut.
>>533949517A real pornography ban that works? As in 99% of people are actually unable to watch porn at all? Mass chaos. It's hard to imagine though. People would jailbreak their phones and install Linux on their PC JUST for porn if they had to. They'd have to ban this too.A partial pornography ban that is more a suggestion than anything else? Just making it harder to access, especially for children. Probably pretty much nothing happens. A few of the dumbest coomers snap and go berserk and everyone mocks them because porn was actually NOT THAT HARD to access ffs.>>533950019And it would increase their business.>Sorry guys, porn is immoral now. You have to pay the girls again to remake the porn. No you can't save it it's subscription-based now.Enshittification.
>>533949517massive suicides nah seriously there is an ocean of porn already, I don't see the urge to see "new" porn
>>533949517The U.S.A would cease to exist because israel would fire all of it's nuclear missiles
>>533949863Lol porn has always been historically known as hostile propaganda to demoralize the fighting age men, its been used this way for centuries now.
>>533949621what? why french
>>533949517>after this petabyte, and the other petabyte, I'll only have one petabyte left!
>>533949517I've met Johnny Sins before, he's a genuinely nice guy.
>>533949837im ngl, when shtf and the australians kill this guy I'll be smiling from ear to ear.
Good. Ban hentai too. It's all weakening men and damaging society.I saw a girl wearing a brazzers hoodie at a restaurant, I couldn't believe it. A black girl with a gay looking black guy
My hard drive has a terabyte of terabytes.
We will create again. ..people will be motivated.
>>533951005Israel broadcasts pron at their neighbors to weaken and distract the fighting men
>>533949517Realistically speaking, people would just keep consuming it using Tor / VPNs / proxies.
>>533951247Yeah i know, did you also know they do the exact same thing to the US? crazy, I know. With bestest allies like this who needs enemies?
>>533949782>>533949863>it's only porn when epstein does it but not when I do it lmaoClassic weeb logicGo back to your 9001 year old dragons that just so happen to look like 5 year olds
>>533951194It's not weakening anything. There is also no damage being done. How you can just be so confidently incorrect is a mystery.
>>533949517Like South Korea shit?Birthrate just goes to zero immediately probably
>>533951273>Tor / VPNs / proxies/usenet, which is still alive and kicking
>>533950950>I don't see the urge to see "new" pornAnd we can upscale the old porn with AI.Most of the women I fap to must be grandmothers by now.
>>533949517They'd need a nationwide mandatory put-out bylaw in effect.
>>533951231Yeah hentai artists will create again
Well that's why I saved all the nudes from the tinder girls I never planned on actually meeting
>>533949517Who cares... I am sure everyone has at least 10TB of pr0n stashed away.The good stuf was lost in the great PORNHUB PURGE... All that Amatuer stuff beats most Fake pron today, same people pretending to be Stepsis and stepbro or a 18 year old to be a mommy.... or some latin chick put on a head scarf and all of a sudden she is Middle east Harem fucking BBC... stupid shit.I wans to see sluts getting fuked on a dirty cum stained matress in a motel
>>533950049>Weren't stag parties basically like goon cavesHave no idea what a goon cave is anon, but trad stag parties were like a moving "speak-easy", and would have porno flickers, booze, drugs, and often women of the night to attend them.Harpy wives would always complain about them and try to get church simps to bust them up and rat them out.
>>533949517VPN stock values would double overnight.
>>533949517We'd just use VPNs. And it wouldn't last because supreme court already set that precedent. You'd get Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh MAYBE voting to keep it banned but Robert's, Ketanji, Sotamayor, Kagen, Gorsuch, and Comey Barrett would vote that banning it violates the constitution.
>>533949517they should ban porn and only fans but legalize brothels. they should only be outside the cities in low density areas so you have to drive to them.
>>533951351Porn has to be sexual in nature. A topless teen is often categorized as obscene but it's absolutely not pornography unless Amazon and Discotek are breaking the law. https://www.amazon.com/Project-Ako-Miki-Ito/dp/B09F86WG8M
>>533951826Naked pubescent humans are sexual by default, cope.
>>533951733class action lawsuits on the grounds of protecting childrens mental health is the surest way to get it banned. social media class actions are setting a new precedent. you dont frame it a free speech issue. you approach it like cigarettes or alcohol.
>>533951895If some jew could sue Amazon for distributing illegal porn, they would have.Genocyber is actually more concerning as it contains a scene with a young boy almost being assaulted, naked and all, but again it's being distributed through normal channels.
>>533951137My younger bro met the owner of BangBros at a bar in Florida and they shot the shit all night long. This was long ago, I think his name was Chris? and he took credit for JMac's career. My immediate concern was he was gonna get my brother into prostitution in FL. But I was reassured it wasn't like that.
>>533951366It's a wasteful outlet of your masculine energy. Porn is a pacifier.
the BBC on da streetz
the BBC law
>>533950875completely disagree. most people watch porn because theyre bored and its easy.you throw up a few basic obstacles and they'll do something else.the gooners who need porn will find a way, but they're fucked anyway. your argument is the same as "harm prevention" for drugs. "well theyre gonna do it anyway!"its simply not true. if you dont give them fucking needles and build safe injection sites everywhere and dont decriminalize, guess what? it turns out MOST people wont do heroin and get a fucking life instead.open brothels instead. let them interact with a real whore and fuck and be forced to shower and shave and move around a bit.
>>533949517Don't make it illegal to view. That's impossible to implement and victimizes addicts. Make it illegal to distribute. Go after the kikes responsible and shut their studios down.
>>533952019Says you. Because you're retarded.
>>533950875>Mass chaos.Yeah just like all the other inhumane laws that people went apeshit and threw out their government over. Oh wait.
>>533952219Well, I'm not against making it harder to access. Especially for children. It's not just "easy to access", it's fucking everywhere. You're getting bombarded with it. Kids probably start watching it at 10 years old or before. That's not right.I think MOST people don't need to watch porn or could watch much less of it. And yeah I think if you put obstacles a lot of people would just stop.But to REALLY ban it, it would take some drastic technological methods and it would block it for nearly everyone. No more porn at all. That would be something else.I think what would be enraging for a lot of people is having those kinds of "morality" laws regulating their private personal behavior while living in a society where things don't really work the way they were supposed to according to those more conservative/traditional principles. It's a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem but still.>open brothels instead. let them interact with a real whore and fuck and be forced to shower and shave and move around a bit.huhhhh-helpI'm being genocided.Coomers are the most oppressed race.
i probably wouldn't notice. i only watch jav through a vpn
>>533952473We can do so much more with that horny energy than just looking at tits online
>>533953658the spaniards literally gave birth to a new race of human beings with that energy. we can argue about whether or not it was ultimately a good thing but hell of a lot more impressive than jizzing into a tissue or sock.
>>533949517Many simps would an hero making the world a better place That’s why I support banning it
>>533949667that guys art fell off hard
>>533949517Even if there was a ban, fat chance that porn would disappear. Hell, even on a fully regulated internet that requires ID to access, people would just kind of revert to DVDs or something.
>>533949517put the jewish filth merchants in prison
>>533951351>weebPlebbitor detected
>>533953865Not at all
>>533953658You could be doing much more with your energy than posting on 4chan, and yet
>>533953910Bans famously make the banned thing disappear forever, thus improving the lives of civilians.
>>533949517Acceleration to an already volatile situation.
>>533949517celebrate, good times, come on
>>533949517You should replace porn with red light districts in LA, New York and Miami. Kike women are whores and if you ban them whoring on camera (and don't provide brothelling as an alternative) she'll 100% whore herself out to all her cousins in the Jewish families which would mean the Jewish birthrate would sky rocket.That is unless we get to go to the final solution then we can do whatever we want.
>>533954459Paypigs and Simps have forever crippled legal prostitution. Guess who created OnlyFans? A Leftist.
>>533949517So much shit would get done. It would be an age of elightenment.
Mass rapes
>>533949621>idaho
>>533949517sauce?
>>533952016Kris. That dude was annoying as fuck, he was always blabbering about nonsense during those bangbus scenes.
>>533949517Banning porn only makes paraphilas that evade the ban much more prominent. This is how Japan ended up with tentacle porn, pissing and NTR after penetrative sex was banned by their pre-boomers. You would have to keep banning increasingly abstract concepts and eventually everyone would be fapping to tile patterns.
>>533956296For me it's vending machine women
>>533949517>how would the US react to a completely fucking retarded arbitrary prohibition
>>533949517The black market would take over as they do for anything else that gets banned like liquor, drugs or certain guns.
It would end up like the child pornography industry which totes doesn't exist
>>533949517Gay man with small brain case on the left, Blaire White on the right.
Ban pornBan any and all forms of prostitution Limit the power of smartphones to be barebones and cripple internet access on it
>>533949517I think wed all be happier that one of the financial instruments of the jews were destroyed.
>>533956158So it's the real deal? Chris with a "K" is fag AF. I guess he's just a lifer at the bars near yachts but doesn't own one.This dude bought GirlsDoPorn just to destroy it. Famously posting a picture of BangBros burning the GDP servers in a campfire. The porn world hated GDP because they got real amateurs and not pornstars pretending to be amateurs.
>>533957042>Ban pornOnly ban commercial porn. You're infringing on my God-given liberty if you outlaw my dick pics.>Ban any and all forms of prostitutionThis would further disrupt gender dynamics. Some foids are born to be whores and paying females for their pussy reduces them to their actual SMV; $200.
>>533949517I would be mad for a day and then go back to reading erotica instead.
Mutts would chimp out
>>533952219Dude literally every guy who doesn't have a bitch to fuck, is watching porn, and if you try to ban it they WILL work around it, and all you'll really succeed in doing is getting more men to learn how to navigate your systems of control.>be forced to shower and shave and move around a bit.We already do that because we have to hold down jobs you braindead retard.
Thousands of years of struggle and tribulation all the pain death and torture every smile every glimpse of progress every brilliant mind and every rotten soul all aligned towards a single purpose and you think you can ban that ?
Say what you will about furfags but at least they make their own porn