>1850 Republicans free the slaves from Democrats >2026 a negro pet tries to kill the Republican President to impress his Democrat pet ownersWhat’s the takeaway here?
>>533954443>What’s the takeaway here?Ashkenazi dna + niggeress dna = verified schizophrenia
That you need a skull check with a golf clip.
>>533954443Except the parties switched. Everyone knows this.
>>533954918The takeaway is that the South was right and niggers are incapable of loyalty.
>>533954443I don't know what passes for Black anymore? Are folks still doing the 1 drop rule.
>>533954443The takeaway is I used to be a democrat in 1850, and now I never will be
its a plant anontheyre decoupling white nationlist/supremacist ideology from racenow anything against the woke globalist shit is white supremacy
>>533956165>Are folks still doing the 1 drop rule.They always have. In america that jig in the OP is called a nigger by everyone. In europe he would be classified as mixed or bipoc or some other bullshit newspeak.
>>533954974The parties didn't switch, Democrats just changed their tactics. They still treat niggers like livestock, they simply farm votes instead of cotton.
>>533956981>A-actually, Republicans were the real progressives!! We actually like niggers!Don't know why conservacucks always fall over themselves to do this. They do this same shit with pointing out the KKK was muh Democrat invention. It just makes them look pathetic to the further-right. The real answer is that the demographics, policies, and constituents of a party 150 years ago are obviously not representative of the party in the modern era. The Democrats were right, and now thanks to decades of psyops and factors such as demographic decline, they no longer are.
