[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1777271863067453.jpg (30 KB, 537x525)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
Ship sinks and
Five people are stranded with supplies for only four. If no one is sacrificed, all will die. Is it morally right to sacrifice one person to save the other four?
>>
File: asdghsafg.jpg (64 KB, 1080x404)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
>>533963122
>>
>>533963122
It's stupid discussing morality when no one else plays by any rules
>>
File: 1777125236322055.gif (1.92 MB, 300x225)
1.92 MB
1.92 MB GIF
>>533963122
First food, then morals.
>>
>>533963122
If it means I or someone I care about survives, yes. If not, then no. I don't care about anyone, other than myself and like 4-5 other people. I would walk past you are dying on the street. If your entire family got obliterated today, I wouldn't think about it twice. People are subhuman and do not deserve a shred of my empathy.
>>
>>533964012
Should we treat you the same way you treat others?
>>
>>533964082
I don't care. You're not relevant to me.
>>
>>533963122
>ships sinks.

They are in ocean, they can do fishing and eat fish.

Also shalom glowie.
>>
>>533963122
depends on who's in the group. always sacrifice the jew first and foremost, followed by pajeet, nigger, tranny, fag/dyke, and women
>>
>>533963122
that's the logic the jews used to murder jesus
>>
>>533963122
If morality is dependent on a finite resource such as food, as in if there was less food then perhaps 2 people should be sacrificed for example, then what you have is not morality but a question of abundance.
If morality is true then it should be self determined because that is what truth is, derived from no others, subject to nothing but itself.
The moral thing to do is to eat happily, not minding how much food there is and agree that we'll all die together as brothers.
>>
>>533963122
I see what youre asking OP

Yeah this is Moloch logic. WE've basically decided that for some to thrive, some must also die and suffer.

Hence why Moloch worship is so prevalent. This is the child sacrifice shit theyve talked about
>>
in a life and death scenario long pork is perfectly fine as long as you stay away from the organs.
unless they're shitskin or nigger, or vaxxed.
have to figure a way of identifying vaxtards now i've thought about it
>>
>>533964012
>myself and like 4 other people
Anon, that's five people, in OP's hypothetical would you kill one to save the rest?
>>
>>533963122
It's not my place to decide who lives or dies. If push comes to shove we'll draw sticks or something.
>>
Sacrifice whoever is most evil out of them



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.