The Holy Roman Empire is often seen as a "relic" of medieval systems, yet thanks to it Germany became the most powerful and advanced nation for centuries. It also made the coalition basically indestructible because it had no central point of failure, not even the symbolic emperor that represented the united germanic Christian culture. Feudalism, either medieval or technological, is unavoidable.Feudalism has the perfect balance between centralization and decentralization. This is why also Japan and China developed it independently too.
>>533974630Why did the empire of the holy romans fall?
>>533974705Technically it never fell. Germany is still a federation of states with a shared identity under a federal government, but regions such as Bavaria have a very high autonomous power.
>>533974630Let me guess: You'd be a lord and not a serf in whatever neo-feudalist society develops in your country?
>>533974630holy roman empire3 words3 lies
>>533974835It most certainly did fall, in 1806 after the battle of Austerlitz and anything resembling a German federal state didnt appear until the North German Confederatin 60 years later.
>>533974705because holy sheeeit
>>533974705French Emperor cucked them
>>533974630It did, yes. Now we're gonna get the jewish version of it. I hate voters
>>533974835Was the Germany of Prussia-Brandenburg just another version of the Austrian HRE? Weren't they structurally different?
>>533974630>he wants to prevent the collapse by feigning clusterization
>>533974630Under techno-feudalism the aristocracy holds no responsibility for leadership, they face no consequences for their actions, and have no contract to balance their power with the peasants.
>>533974957I'd had no problem serving a loving and wise lord. Equality is a modern lie based on proletariat envy.
>>533975004>Holy Roman Recognized by the Pope as spiritual continuation of Rome, just as USA today (pax Romana, Pax Americana).>empireIf Russia was an empire having different diverse countries inside, so was the HRE.
>>533974705Because it was neither Holy nor Roman.
>>533975174Thta will be balanced out and negotiated naturally. Yes, elites will have more power using tech, but tech also empowers subjects. Medieval people used the power of wind, river and animals to move industries. Tech actually empowered serfs compared to just having slaves as romans or modern Jews did later.
Aristocracy literally means "power of the excellent" but neocons would rather be cucked by megacorporations and partisan glowniggers
>>533975431Are you fucking drunk? Modern peasants scan packages for Jeff Bezos until he automates that job and leaves them to starve.
>>533974630It will just be yet another transitional phase.
>>533975861But if you get that to the extreme then no one will have money to spend on Amazon so elites lose income, or the elites will live completely off grid on robots, so we will not matter in any case... They will not exploit us and we will not rely on them. In any case, elites only exist in contrast to the subjects, it's a contract. If there is no need for each other then there is also no conflict or tension.
>>533975969When the transitional phases are 90% of history, then maybe we are the transitional phase.
