every “modern”“abstract” (((artist))) should be stuffed into a death camp
>>533985932agreed. i like impressionist art though
>>533985932Bruh you meant contemporary, not modern, and "abstract" is a massive category with a wide variety of different styles. I personally think someone who has no interest in the subject shouldnt speak about it, because it's always the same canned "nice thing looks nice" reply.
>>533985932
>>533985932>AI is slopbitch cmon
>>533985932That's a piece you'd do as a fun project with your girlfriend to hang on the wall. Not something you'd sell or show off lol
>>533986778I’m a real artist it requires massive amounts of studying and understanding. These people are not artists. They pour acrylic (worst most jewish medium ever made) You are a talentless hack who simps for other talentless hacks
>>533986899Very little of that is modernism, mexico jr. Technically art deco is modernism. Like one of the buildings is, maybe.
>>533985932That's actually not bad. Kinda trippy. Would be good for the bathroom.
>>533987130no one cares about your hairsplitting bullshit go throw some paint on the floor like pollock. go draw some triangles and say they represent starving children in africa or whatever
>>533985932She is really pretty. Would make half white-half jew babies with her.
>>533987119That's nice and all, if you were a "real" with massive amounts of study and undetstanding, you'd understand Picasso and Duchamp's progression, as well as the shift from romanticism to modernism changing the purpose of art from representing what exists to providing a thought in context, which is agnostic of style.>>533987263What happened to the study you were bragging about, anon who knows nothing about a subject he said he was an expert at?
>>533985932Roasti made a painting of her cunt
>>533986778>you need to be educated to enjoy artI dont think its that complicated, mister
>>533987130Modernism and postmodernism are continuations of the same ethos of rejecting tradition and beauty and pushing for degradation of societal standards. >>533987403>you'd understand Picasso and Duchamp's progressionA bunch of liberal hippies who did art to manipulate the masses. >changing the purpose of art from representing what exists to providing a thought in contextRepresentation of thoughts and concepts already existed long before, but tying them to reality actually made them valuable. Thoughts beyond reality are delusions, that is what differences valid philosophies from shit like solipsism or subjectivism which exists to feed the ever hungry ego from arrogant idiots, including the two moronic "artists" you mentioned.
>>533985932I like it. Sorry.
>>533988162Great news for you, you can produce it yourself with no prior knowledge or skill at all
