can i get a rundown on the leo frank case?i find it very strange that the sources exonerating frank are all jewish...
>>533989892The literal KKK thought the black dude was innocentThats all you need to know
SPLC is a kike organization that has been lying since its inceptionThat's all kikes dohe was clearly guiltykikes don't careonly the tribe matters and goyim exist to serve them
some kike holiday where the kikes rape and murder children. Every year close to passover, children disappear.
>>533989954/thread
>>533990027Meant ADL but SPLC tooTrust JewsBad News
More than Op can read, but yeah.
>>533989892Jew died. End of story.
He was framed. Poor lad.
>>533990160checks out
>>533989892Anon im gonna give you the quicket run down and let you decide who dun it. >Be jew>Own Pencil factory>Hottie young girl works for me>Wanna give her my kosher sausage>Rejects me.>Allegedly kill her and leave her in the ditch >Black night watchman finds the body>Cops detain and question him, a black man, in the south, in the antebellum south.>Nah not the black night watchman.>Investigate leo frank>Find him guilty>Fast forward man decades later>OY VEY HE WAS A GOOD BOY WHO DID NUTTIN< ITS ANADUH SHOWA!
>>533989892Everything you need to know about Leo Frank and why he was guilty can be found in this article:>100 Reasons Leo Frank Is Guiltyhttps://nationalvanguard.org/2013/04/100-reasons-proving-leo-frank-is-guilty/Jewish historian Leonard Dinnerstein has basically made it his life's work to exonerate Leo Frank. Dinnerstein has spent his entire career publishing ridiculous pseudohistorical debunkings of major pieces of evidence against Frank. None of it holds up.The fact that Wikipedia claims there is historical consensus that Frank was innocent is frankly absurd, but goes to show how far decades of Jewish academic lobbying can go.
>>533990273very interesting.The fact that I as a Jew-hater don’t even know how unanimous it was is a testament to the strength of Jewish programming is.
>>533990160i did read it and thank you, i wasnt aware that he was attacked in prisoni wonder how different things would be if the attempt was successful
>>533989892Leo was PARDONED, not exonerated. Pardon is where they say "what you did might have been technically illegal, and duly convict-able, but we figure you had your reasons, so you get a pass.Jewish legal scholars have brought up that Mary had "exceptionally well developed breasts for her young age" and that combo was just too much to expect a Jew to be able to resist.Sorta like when Nixon tried to cover up Watergate. On one hand he was pissed at his own idiots for even doing it in the first place, but he also figured if he covered it up it wouldn't de-rail the rest of his admin's agenda all ready in progress and covering it up would protect the reputation of The Presidency and rest of USA. On March 11, 1986, the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles granted a posthumous pardon to Leo Frank, 70 years after his 1915 lynching. The pardon, championed by the Anti-Defamation League, did not declare him innocent or exonerate him, but was issued due to the state’s failure to protect him while in custody and to bring his killers to justice.^^^That makes no fucking sense. Lots of bad shit happens to people after conviction where "State fails to protect" and that is never a reason for a "Pardon". LOL.BTW, there never a hint of "anti-Semitism" in the trial, the many appeals (all the way to SCOTUS for basically whole new trial, first and ONLY time in USA's history, and basically illegal) or even The Press or among the lynch mob.Newspapers DID refer to "Mr Leo Frank and THE NEGRO".
>>533989892>leo frank QRDimpossible.
>>533990273god promissed him sex with that woman 3,000 years ago
>>533989892>Leo Frank was a gud boy who dindu nuffin>random negro rapes and kills young catholic girl at his pencil factory>there is overwhelming evidence said negro was guilty, but the local clansmen have such a biggoted lust for Jewish blood that they execute the innocent angel Leo insteadThis is why they invented the Scofield bible.
