What would need to happen for Russia to actually nuke Ukraine or anyone else in 2026?
>>534030225Their nukes would have to magically start working again after decades of neglect and corruption.
>>534030225Trump nukes Tehran.
NUKES ARE FAKE
>>534030225>"I'm not bluffing"At this point, I'm convinced politics are MKULTRA to make you align your behavior with inept buffoons. It's not just a useless thing to say, it's tactically disasterous. And dontget me started in Trump.
>>534030269This.
>>534030225Lmao imagine losing a war you stated against a tiny broke country
>>534030225I bet they tried launch a nuke but the shit stayed at silo.
>>534030225>to actually nuke Ukraine or anyone else in 2026?make nukes real
>>534030225what's the hold up
I remember Russia using some super expensive hypersonic ballistic missile to destroy some old ukranian shed without any casualties.That money could have been used to raise half of Russia off on its feet, but hey, here we are.
>>534030225Putin seems to be the only one that doesnt want it to happen. Fucking pussy
>>534030225Thats the wrong question. Correct question is: whats the tactical or strategical benefit of using nuke ? Russia wipes Kiev off the map with nuke. What do they gain ?
>>534030269fpbp/thread
>>534030312>HU-DURK
>>534030269>Nukes le go rustyAbsolute retard take. But they could be sold to muslims knowing unmeasurable corruption of russian generals
>>534030292>Trump nukes Tehran.Nuking Russia's allies is exactly how US wants to de-escalate conflict with Russia. Obama's docrine was to nuke Minsk in Belarus. Trump probably prefers Iran, but this is how US wants Russia to NOT use nukes.
>>534030225It happened during russias withdrawals in 2022. Sullivan and blinken took the threat seriously. It probably influenced on what weaponry ukraine received. At the time there were people who thought ukraine was winning too hard.They aren't going to nook because part of the motivation for the war is that ukrainians are just misguided russians that need to be corrected. From their point of view it would be like nuking your own people.It may seem impossible now but it is entirely possible that if the war ended today, during next 30 years somebody pro-moscow will end up ruling ukraine anyway and they essentially become like belarus.
>>534030976no, retard, radioactive materials don't stop being radioactive when you put them inside a nuke. radioactive decay slowly ruins the missile's circuitry, housing and it also becomes less potent over time
>>534030778German flag on russian soil. I would like that.
>>534030225First off for them to have functional nukes that they can actually deliver to their target.We've seen how much their conventional arms, that have actually needed using in recent memory, have degraded from neglect and corruption. Even our own nuclear weapon management has huge issues because they're ultimately never supposed to be used beyond as a threat so it's kinda a career dead-end that doesn't get a lot of oversight and a lot of shit is allowed to slip through the cracks.Russia has also lost bombers and even subs that they would use to deliver/launch nukes and perhaps most importantly they KEEP just SPECTACULARLY failing missile test launches. At least one reportedly just blew up at launch but there's video of the, perhaps more terrifying, case of the missile going up... and then turning and coming right back down nearby as those videoing freak out.If Russia actually tried to launch a nuclear strike, especially suddenly in desperation, I honestly believe they'd most likely just end up nuking themselves.Secondly they don't dare risk bringing NATO more directly into the conflict if a hint of radiation so much as inches past a border.It's why they drew so many "nuclear red lines" which they allowed to be crossed with impunity that they stopped drawing them to not just keeping being humiliated.It's why the "potential for NATO missiles on Russia's border" was an absolutely unacceptable possible security risk justifying the invasion of non-nato-member Ukraine to stop but when finland actually joined, with a border even closer to moscow, suddenly it was all about the terrain for a land invasion(as if that has gone so well for them in Ukraine lol) or something and completely different and while still SUPER bad, nato BAD!, is not demanding of any actual action.
>>534033877>most importantly they KEEP just SPECTACULARLY failing missile test launches.Strange as they have more advanced missile tech then Eu and US. https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/russia-has-the-fastest-hypersonic-missile-on-earth/#:~:text=Russia%20is%20the%20first%20country%20to%20develop%20hypersonics.,be%20able%20to%20reach%20an%20impressive%20MACH%208.
>>534034412>AKSHUALLY stronk Russia has most advanced fastest missiles better than all west!Ok but why can't they successfully launch them then?
>>534033877Do you stupid faggots shilling for the end of the world think anyone believes you?What a piece of shit you are.Russia is WAY ahead of the USA in rocket tech. They had to supply our stranded astronauts. Thier hypersonic missile was clocked at 8000/mph.Eat shit you word salad faggot shill
>>534035244Then WHY DO THEY KEEP FAILING TEST LAUNCHES?
>>534034947but they have? https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/russia-has-the-fastest-hypersonic-missile-on-earth/>Russia Has the Fastest Model>The Zircon, which may even be able to hit MACH 9, is the world’s fastest hypersonic missile, making it difficult to shoot down. It is powered by a ramjet or scramjet engine, and its first test was in 2017. The Zircon is often sea-launched, and the first known deployment was on the missile frigate Admiral Gorshkov. The Zircon was first conceived as an anti-ship missile; the land attack capabilities came later.>The Zircon reaches altitude with a solid fuel engine, and then the scramjet propulsion system takes over. Russian generals also boast about their Kinzhal ballistic missile, which can reach speeds of MACH 10 or more than 7,600 miles per hour.Here is a little more critical article on the subject https://defence.nridigital.com/global_defence_technology_oct24/who_has_the_hypersonic_edge
>>534035350Ok faggotIs this where you pretend Musk didnt blow up 20 rockets in the last few years?Its part of developing new tech.Shit for brains>look this one rocket blew up that means none of them work!
>>534030225Remember in WWE season 2 in 2019 when Buck Chuckle Sneedy told Ribald Fuckman that he was gonna Fuck Him Right Up The Ass Real Tight? Me neither lol
>>534030225Nudes of the female diver whore that blew up Nordstream.Peak clown world
>>534035484>watch as he says Musk did it as "part of le plan"
>>534038194>https://montenegro.news-pravda.com/en/russia/2025/08/27/1955.html>The key character in the European version of the Nord Stream bombing is probably Valeria Chernyshova.>The name matches, the first letter of the surname also matches, since in German it will be Tschernyschowa, the age also matches — the banned FB indicates that she entered the university in 2001, there is also a corresponding diving record, and the FB account is clearly pro-Ukrainian, militant.>A little over a year after the explosion of the joint venture, in January 2024, Chernyshova received a certificate from Montenegro as an instructor in one of the diving varieties (Sidemount - diving with a side configuration of equipment). It means that she left Ukraine abroad after the sabotage.
>>534035448>but they have?It's more like 50/50, really. For every test/attack that Russia prides itself, there's a case of Russian wunderwaffe blowing up during launch that is brushed under the carpet.However means of delivering are one thing. Whenever nuke warhead are touched, entire world knows because these things (almost) glow to satellite recon. Russians weren't sure if they're capable of protecting Moscow's Red Square from Ukrainians drones during their incoming Pride Parade. There's no way they could keep their nuke warheads safe from US/NATO's attack when they put them out of the fridge.
>>534030269I have a feeling most of their stockpile has been sold off since the end of the cold war and the retards they sold them to don't know how to use them and like everything else Russian they probably just don't work.
>>534039627>It's more like 50/50, really. For every test/attack that Russia prides itself, there's a case of Russian wunderwaffe blowing up during launch that is brushed under the carpet.Where the info on this?
>>534038194A female diver blowing up nordstream? Wow, that's hilariously incompetent of the Germans to allow that to happen.
>>534039759Dude, there were at least two failures of Russian Sarmat missile since 2022:https://russianforces.org/blog/2024/09/a_failed_test_of_sarmat_destro.shtmlhttps://united24media.com/latest-news/purple-plume-over-yasny-after-suspected-rs-28-launch-failure-13868Russian's just can't show their delivering capabilities, other that brag about "sub sonic" short range missiles.Zircons were proved to be intercepted by Patriots just this year. For the same reason Oreshniks weren't even shot anywhere near Ukrainian Patriots.
