Would America be better under a constitutional monarchy?
Yes but only if jews and other foreigners were first expelled, otherwise they could use the monarchy as a puppet to enslave us
>>534044460Hell no. Theocratic Absolute Monarchy yes. And before you freak out, only fags would be in danger, eunics wouldn't.
>>534044460Fuck this disgusting soul- and gutless asshole pussy. I bet he sucks on Camillas toes every night and day.
>>534044460Reminder: Charles' own mother saw him as a bungling entitled asshole and actively wanted him to sit the throne for as short a time as possible because she knew the average person hated his guts and the longer he ruled the sooner people would wonder why the royals haven't been abolished.
>>534044460No, of course not.
>>534044460He would be better with his head chopped off
>>534044460It’s under the Netanyahu dynasty
>>534044460You cant improve on the unisystem
>>534044460What’s the point of even having a king these days, it seems like a humiliation ritual for everyone involved including the king
>>534044460No
>>534044460His parents were cousins tho
>lol
George Washington was a stepfather with no kids of his own. His nephew Bushrod Washington wanted to send freed slaves back to Africa and would have made a good king.
What exactly is having a king doing for your country other than having a glorified tourist attraction and ensuring the Rothschilds secretly control everything?
>>534050914Bankers will always win because they are united. They have a brotherhood and look out for each other. That was the idea of central banking, a bank of banks.If some king refuses to pay debts, or goes "might makes right" and kills his creditor, the other bankers fund the opposition. Bankers can thus choose kings or change their policies.
>>534050914>>534046924It may not seem like it, but kings serve to unify the nation amidst so much political carnage(It seems the current King of the Brits is unpopular, so perhaps this doesn't apply to them as much)
>>534044460>Would America be better under a constitutional monarchy?Let's see how that's working out for Engl .... OH GOD NO
>>534044460No, you lipstick-wearing felch-monkey.
>>534044934Two out of three ain't bad.
>>534045362Yeah but Andrew was her favourite son so I think we can question the judgement there.Call me woke if you want but Queen Anne II would have been the best outcome. Based and the only thing she has ever done wrong involved driving sports cars at stupid speeds.Maybe if we need a truly ruthless war monarch...God for Anne, England and Saint George!
>>534053192Anne is based. I met her once when she came to my school and she was very easy to speak to. She also beat up the person who tried to kidnap her. She really is her fathers daughter.
