to have a revolution or a Civil War this century? I was reading population projections yesterday to see when (((official))) projections estimate certain countries will be majority shitskins (Sweden is projected to be 30.6% Muslim by 2050, for example). It got me thinking about these kinds of projections and what assumptions they have to make for them to fit. The most obvious is that the governments of these nations will remain as they are, with no revolutions or civil war causing a new or different form of government to establish itself. So I ask these questions:>Do you think any individual EU countries are likely to have a violent revolution in the next century?>Do you think any will have a BLOODLESS revolution? Maybe a Constitutional Convention-style approach where they realize things aren't working and try something new?>Which do you think are most likely?Personally, I think it's a near certainty that at least a few Euro countries will have a revolution in the next hundred years. I have no idea which ones, but I really doubt there's enough good will left between parties to attempt a bloodless reform.
>>534045098to have a revolution or a Civil War this century?None. Jews paid for the Revolutions and Civil Wars prior to get themselves were they are at now. Whites are gonna pay to overthrow (((them)))
>>534045302>Whites are gonna pay to overthrow (((them)))Took me a minute to figure it out. I think we're talking about the same thing; which will become 110, then?
