[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11308703/
>>
>>534049407
Thats great and all, and im down with that plan OP, but first we remigrate 100% of all non-whites and jews from all western nations.
-
Do we have a deal?
>>
File: 1720284493337456.jpg (309 KB, 1024x918)
309 KB
309 KB JPG
>>534049407
>picrel: the science changed chud
So I actually read the methodology of this study, unlike the shillbots who post this bullshit who are "so much smarter" than you. Their criteria for determining political belief was a survey with vague questions that have almost no bearing on the corresponding political belief. They did this so that no matter what the respondents say, you can claim that it supports leftism or rightism, and then just shove all the high IQs into the leftist catagory and the low IQs in the rightist. It's bad faith research, as is the case with literally all of these "leftism is high IQ" studies.

TLDR: Survey-tier research, lying with data, and low N-count. Leftism entirely depends on you not reading the methodology section.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.