There are two buttons a red button and a blue button.If more than half the people press the red button nothing happens. If more than half the people press the blue button everyone's standard of living will increase drastically, however a small group of less than a few hundred people will lose value on their assets which won't affect their own standard of living but will lower their net worth.Which button do you press?https://strawpoll.com/Q0Zp7wDKAgM
I need Teto's feet on my face
>>534055733Stirby <3
>>534055673Not playing this game. I just want housing to crash. My property taxes would go down and blackrock would lose billions. No one would gain anything besides access to affordable housing
>>534055673I press the yellow button
>>534055673Red and you are gay for making this thread so soon we just had it.
>>534055673I turn 360° degrees and walk away.
>>534055971I didn't know someone already thought of this.>>534055965>>534056043Why?
>>534055971Also why red? Do you have more than a billion in assets?
>>534055673>vote for team red or blue Nah
>>534056207Every boomer is just a temporarily embarrassed gorrillianaire.
>>534055673Press them both at the same time
>>534056131>Why?If you are being given just two options, its likely you are being played
>>534055673>there's two buttons, one does nothing and the other does some impossible fantasy that makes communism real and goodfuck of already, idiot
>vote blue>you're on the loser group
>>534056475You do know it is a hypothetical right? Like how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning?>>534056675No idea who you are quoting but which button would you press if it was the case that these buttons do the thing they describe?
>>534056986i'm quoting you, it's called communism and it doesn't work.>If more than half the people press the blue button everyone's standard of living will increase drastically, however a small group of less than a few hundred people will lose value on their assets which won't affect their own standard of living but will lower their net worth.
>>534057379But what if you didn’t have breakfast this morning?
>>534057806>but what if communism just worked?it doesn't, may as well say one button changes the gravitational coefficient or the speed or light, it's nonsense.
>>534058026You can’t think hypothetically about what would happen if the speed of light were different?
>>534055673TETO SEX
>>534058237not with any coherence, it breaks so many things that reality itself falls part.
>>534056207Uh, self preservation? Is there something wrong with wanting to live and not putting your survival in the hands of a low-trust society? Anyone pressing the blue button is virtue signaling at this point
>>534058415Lmao you really can't answer a hypothetical can you?>>534058651What do you mean by low-trust?>Anyone pressing the blue button is virtue signaling at this pointHuh? Doing what is in your own best interest is virtue signaling? Is it virtue signaling to eat food when you're hungry?
At least it seems most people are actually sane enough to act in their own self interests.
>>534055673I press the TND button
>>534055673There are two buttons a red button and a blue button.If more than half the people press the red button nothing happens.If more than half the people press the blue button the Democratic party and it's supporters in the media and education systems are declared terrorists and traitors and hauled off to Gitmo Bay for mass trials and executions.
>>534059539Teto knows what you are.
>>534058929of course i can.let me put it in child's terms so you might understand.what if 1+1 = 3? what then?well nothing then, it's in incoherent hypothetical without any meaning nor grounding in any coherent rational framework.
>>534055733based
>>534060215Its funny because the underpinning of modern mathematics requires us to ask, "what if this set of axioms is true, what would the logical consequences be?"You're just a dumb gorilla nigger kek.
>>534060215>what if 1+1 = 3?Then 3+3 might equal 4. Do you see how I can engage with a hypothetical and you can not?
