A government ruled by lottery (and direct democracy when possible) by all citizens is far superior to that of election tribalism. modern election "democracy" (oligarchy puppet show contest): >all the citizen can do is pick which jew worshipper that will fuck them over the least >getting involved means spending years building a career and support, which could be meaningless >built for being taken advantage of by rich narcissist psychopaths that aren't even competent outside of connections >corruption prone because it's extremely easy to plan white collar crimes around rigged two party elections Athenian Democracy (true representation): >lottery ensures fair representation across all of society, random people from all walks of life decide how society should run >far more resistant to corruption because chances of getting into power are random, so you can't just get lobbied into seats (obviously corruption still exists but is more localised to accountable individuals) >makes people invested into their nation because they have a direct say >prevents minority overrepresention
On this board there are numerous topics that refer to history and classical history.Strong interest.I would strongly advise people to do some reading and research, it is interesting and on topic, do not get stuck on details.KEY TOPIC of many,THE HELLENISTIC KINGDOMSAthens and the city states is very interesting too, more politically incorrect is The Hellenistic Kingdoms.Alexander's Generals,The Romans took them over and named Alexander,The Great for what his generals built.
>>534063774a lottery is not satisfying
