Was he right, /pol/?
>>534074104americans (at least 60% of them) are genetically european. i dont understand why people are trying to pretend there's a huge chasm between an average white american and a white european.
How would feel knowing Israel excels the rest of the world in all those categories?
>name is gerbils>looks like a rat
>>534074104The notion that slang is a uniquely American linguistic phenomenon is an interesting take but it's provably false.I think he was talking out of his ass.
>>534074219shilling for muttmerica wont stop the inevitable russian invasion, tadeusz
>>534074219it’s a system not a peopleit was created in denial of Europe
>>534074219Because genetics and culture are not the same thing. There is a two way influence, but American culture is basically a toilet bowl and they don’t see any need to improve it because $$$$
>One is never sure which of two characteristics is more prominent in the American national character and therefore of the greater significance: naivete or a superiority complex. When for example they say things about our region, our surprise at their ignorance is surpassed only by annoyance at their stupid insolence. The less they know about a matter, the more confidently they speak. They really believe that Europeans are eagerly waiting to hear from them and heed their advice. They took our strategic decision not to discuss their shallow culture before the war as a sign of admiration. Their greatest technical accomplishments are refrigerators and radios. They cannot believe that there are cultural values that are the result of centuries of historical development, which cannot simply be bought. It was no bad joke when, after the war, they bought the ruins of German castles and moved them stone by stone to the U.S.A. They really thought that they had purchased a piece of national history embodied in stone, and were naive enough to think that mocking laughter from Europe was respect for the wealth that enabled them to buy what their own tradition and culture lacked.
>>534074266Everyone uses slang, but as can be seen by zoomer lingo (which is mostly American streamers inventing and pushing) it’s about half of the American vocabulary. And slang is essentially forfeiting your own intelligence in accurate communication and expression in favour of what’s new and easy. It’s how a nigger thinks or speaks and it wouldn’t surprise me if the negro influence in the americas is why slang is so huge in South America as well.
>>534074104Cowboys were mutt culturethat pretty distinct and unique
>>534074219And here is the cocksleeve
>>534074104>build entire identity on being the master race>fight one (1) war>lose
>>534074510>it’s about half of the American vocabularyThat's another interesting take but it's also provably false. I accept that it's just hyperbole, though. Anyway, slang isn't inherently more difficult to understand, it just gets a little more difficult for people as they age to keep up with it. There's nothing wrong with calling pantaloons pants unless your grandfather can't understand what it means and refuses to learn, but that's his problem.
>>534074318russia isn't even a regional power coconigger.
>>534074261
yea hes more or less wrong. especially when we understand that this critique of his does not exist in a vacuum and we know what his alternative is All ideologues are bug people, and while american culture is discordant, full of degeneracy, whatever you want to say, it at least has room for real art and real sincere expression, and America managed to produce one of the best works of literature ever made, among a slew of other artistic accomplishments, while national socialism was a a cultural black hole of artificial and superficial art propped up by insincerity and ideological pretense that failed to produce anything of noteobviously they weren't around for very long so at face it appears unfair to judge them compared to the US, but the reality is that national socialisms approach to culture operates the same artificial and anti-human way communist culture did, and from that I feel pretty comfortable extrapolating that national socialism probably would not have gone on to produce anything of value except in critical works that might have been smuggled out of their territory to be published abroad. Ideology is inherently anti-art, and like under communism where the Soviet state heavily forced its writers and other artists to produce works adhering to the doctrine of Socialist Realism, national socialism did not approach art as sincere form of human expression, but instead as nothing but a series of boxes to be checked to ensure a uniform expression of ideology meant to empower the state, this it was virtually impossible for real, meaningful art to be made under the conditions it imposes.
emersonwilliam jameshoes mad
>>534074104Subjective opinions about art aside, to deny that America contributed anything to civilization is just self deluded cope. American culture is practical, it rewards ingenuity, competitiveness, and entrepreneurship. It's what allowed America to grow so many genius inventors and brain drain the rest of the world of theirs.
>>534075821>America managed to produce one of the best works of literature ever madeMoby Dick I'm guessing?
>>534074104*Laughs in Hemingway and Rockwell*
>>534076667George Lincoln Rockwell?
>>534074104This pic looks AI-generated, there's a medal covering the iron cross that shouldn't be there
>>534074450Bhahaahahahah holy based, never read that one. Absolutely dead on astute observation. And nothing's changed in 90 years.
>>534074450It's funny to see Goebbels talking about history a few centuries older than US history like its antiquity, while simultaneously Hitler was bemoaning how the Germans of antiquity were White niggers with no real history.
>>534074104This is now the third time in three days this has bee posted, and twice in 8 hours. You're shilling, and this is a slide thread