[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_20260416_182545.jpg (471 KB, 1920x1080)
471 KB
471 KB JPG
Legalize rape by soldiers of anyone they come across in a war and the military recruitment problem will disappear. In all of human history until 100 years ago soldiers were allowed to rape anyone they wanted from those they were at War with.
>>
>>534080233
Indian hands types this
>>
Thread theme
https://youtu.be/BpQveRzD3sQ
>>
>>534080233
>rape and pillage
once they made fun illegal war became less fun
>>
False.

Legalizing rape by soldiers during wartime would cause recruitment numbers to decline.

>the military and government would essentially be putting themselves on a sex offender registry and thereby losing all status and respect

>soldiers returning home would be stigmatized even further regardless of whether they participated in such war crimes

>the majority of American men don't need to rape anyone to obtain sexual gratification

>the types of men who are pathological enough to be incentived by a "spoils of war" clause in the contract wouldn't even pass MEPS examination

The entire idea of rape occurring during wartime as a "buffet of free pussy" tossed to starving dogs, such as (you), contradicts the necessity of maintaining discipline over soldiers in order to extract the very best of their abilities on the battlefield. Mass rape events are recorded in history but it's the officers organizing such war crimes and only they have the choice of the which civilian women will be exploited; meaning that even if you managed to rape anyone, you'd likely be the last in what might be a very long line and the experience would be like sticking your dick into a toilet (loose, sloppy, and filled with other men's body fluids).

It's also highly unlikely that a guy like OP would risk his life on a battlefield for a chance to rape someone when he won't even risk being rejected by a woman; opting instead to lust from the sidelines. Furthermore, the volume of manual labor that military lays on the backs of soldiers is just something that the OP isn't built to handle. The truth is that men like OP aren't capable of joining in a gang rape because their naturally low testosterone levels; the only thing he would do is watch.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.