How can we solve this?
>>534085389You cannot take this at face value since women become mothers younger. The women who wanted children already had them and thus are not included in that stat
It's not solvable.Society will have to degrade to the point it is forced to correct.
>>534085389women lie to weird dudes, they literally have to do thisif you dont like it stop being a weird dude
>>534085389Currently 83% of women and 61% of men eventually have children so the 21% not wanting them tracks with data from the last 300 years. Nothing different is happening so there isn’t any need to fix anything. We still remain at the most men of any time in history breeding, 10,000 years ago 18 women bred for everyone 1 man so be glad you incels didnt live then
>>534085389By finding a woman who doesn't and putting kids in her.
>>534085389Leftism got it's way.
>>534085446good catch on the confounding effectwe must conduct a Bayesian Analysis
>>534085510>83% of women and 61% of men eventually have childrenThat's such a brutal stat in its own right lmao
>>534085446>>534085786Question:>What percentage of young women, aged 18-34 in USA, do not want children?What we must find out:>The share of childless women aged 18-34 in USAextrapolated from pic related and census data from next pic related>The desire of childlessness in child-having women aged 18-34 in USAassumed to be close to 0>The desire of childlessness in childless women aged 18-34 in USA21% per OP's pic
>>534085446>>534085786>>534086200using pixel width in MSPaint, we can find the Population of WomenAge 18-19 = 4.34 millionAge 20-24 = 10.92 millionAge 25-29 = 11.03 millionAge 30-34 = 11.82 million
>>534085389It's called evolution via natural selection. Let these "modern women" be bred out of the genepool. They are worthless.
>>534086933pixels have a consistent width unless you're using a really REALLY fancy screen anon
>>534085446>>534086200>>534086933using linear extrapolation, we can estimate childlessness rates from 18-19, and get the remaining age cohorts from pic relatedAge 18-19 = 95.5%Age 20-24 = 85.0%Age 25-29 = 63.0%Age 30-34 = 40.3%and multiply those with their respective cohort populations to get Childless Women totals:Age 18-19 = 4.14 millionAge 20-24 = 9.28 millionAge 25-29 = 6.95 millionAge 30-34 = 4.76 million
>>534085446>>534086933>>534087140finally we can aggregate for the entire 18-34 women in USA cohort>(4.14+9.28+6.95+4.76)/(4.34+10.92+11.03+11.82)66% of the entire aforementioned cohort are childlessnow to return to our Bayesian calculationIf 66% of that cohort is childless, and 21% of that childless cohort does not desire children per OP,and assuming close to 100% of women that have at least one child, wanted to have them, meaning 0% desire to be childless...now we can determine what is the exact share of all the women, aged 18-34 in USA, that do or do not want children>0.66*0.21 + 0.34*0 = 13.9%>0.66*0.79 + 0.34*1 = 86.1%13.9% of all women aged 18-34 in USA do not want children86.1% of women aged 18-34 in USA do want children
>>534087588+1pt women, -1pt incels
>>534085389I will solve it by having 10 children and them also having ten children. Anyone who doesn't solve it will be selected out of existence.
>>534085389>30s>youngLol
