Do you agree?
>>534136566No
Absolutely
>>534136617Nigger lover
>>534136797He is probably just a nigger
It's common sense
>>534136797 It sounds like it’s likely you may commit a crime in the future and I think we should lock you up forever.
I bet the comic artist thought they were making a good point
>>534136566No. I think we should just ban the dogs.
>>534136566Fixing this problem with words and laws causes more problems. Most solutions go directly to judges ALWAYS giving out max sentencing to cover their asses, which is not good.It’s an interesting thought though I will consider it.
>>534136566At the very least they should lose their job for incompetency
>>534136566Absolutely. Judges demonstrate time and time again why they cannot be entrusted with judicial discretion. Judges need to be held civilly and criminally liable when the feral animals they let back into the community commit more crimes.
>>534136617This nigga hate the law.
>>534137864This nigga love mass incarceration
dog owners aren't held accountable as much as they should be. If your dog mauls a kid, it should be treated the same as you doing it. same for niggos
>>534137029Nigger lover confirmed
>>534137962Yes.
>>534137249they should have to face the public. let the parents of all those dead kids confront the judge that’s letting the jeet stay in canada because of his mental health or whatever. the jeet should be locked up forever in a slave compound. the judges shouldn’t have let him free and to make it worse they’ll let the jeet stay in the country.
>>534136566I don't understand these judges that look at somebody who's 40 years old, never held a job, has been arrested thirty times for stealing, assault, etc. and thinks "they'll turn it around if I'm lenient on them this time."
>>534136566Incompetent judges should be made into the felon's cell-mate. Make them spend year trapped with the nut-bars they let go.
>>534137962Mass incarceration for who? Also this is what you sound like
>>534136566Dog owners are very rarely held accountable, and yes, both should be. >>534137051Yeah it's a very left side of the IQ bell curve take.
>>534136566If the woman was just inside the house, naked and barefoot doing housework then we wouldn’t have a need for dog owners being held accountable and Deshawn could politely knock on the door and not at the subway while hubby is at work.
>>534136566Yes. They'll take their decisions a lot more seriously if the fear of severe consequences looms over them.
>>534138175>>534137962Actually I like the flogging post.Hate Heinlein though.
>>534136566one day when there's a complete knowledge of the human brain and as a result leftist ideology has been universally recognized as the anti-reality ideology that it is, people will laugh with pitiful contempt at the naive foolishness of previous generations of letting women be judges
>>534136566Judges sign off on documents in the legal system. They absolutely should be held accountable and face criminal investigations for patterns of incompetence.Too many judges are activists and letting criminals off the hook, because of biases and not simply interpretation of law.
Fuck this jewlover
>>534138014There are multiple threads by Nafo troons now accusing China of being a Potemkin Village country.It's infuriating.
>>534136566Based take
>>534136566Yes except it's even worse than that.
>>534136566An interesting idea, I do wonder what unintended consequences and doors this opens up though. On face value I'm not against it
>>534136566White women literally voted for this. Let them suffer.
You are property of the state. They can not be held accountable.The 14th amendment made a new political class, Citizen of the United States. That is a citizen of the federal government. They have limited access to constitutional protections.... no rights only "privileges and immunities." Constitutional protections come from being a citizen of one of the several states. You will see the two delineated in supreme Court cases like the slaughter house cases. The former "state citizen" is now in the statues as "national" https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?def_id=8-USC-2045486514-1201680063&height=800&iframe=true&term_occur=4&term_src=&width=840When they give you a form asking if you are a citizen of the United States and a resident do they ask a resident of what state? Nope. Because they are not asking where you live. They are asking a legal question. A resident is someone living in a place for benefits or to discharge a duty. Just like a medical resident on a hospital. They are working for on the job training. They are not employed there. Citizens of the United States are voluntary serfs to the federal government in DC.
>>534137226>Most solutions go directly to judges ALWAYS giving out max sentencingBetter than "restorative" (read: no) justice where they just dump hardened criminals back on the street because your great-great-grandfather picking a field counts as time served.
>>534138098Because you can't just lock everyone up for 20+ years. There is a weighted system that requires space and resources for some rapist or killer etc. So your drug dealing car thief is going to get less time etc. We already lock up more people than anywhere else in the world but it's not a real solution. As for judges, a huge chunk of the issue is people are to stupid to understand why certain cases seem to have less punishment.
>>534136566Common sense nigger laws when? A truly just society would make the judge share a jail cell with the negro that they love so much and released on the public knowing they were dangerous.
>>534138098It's suicidal empathy, mixed with a martyr complex. It's a perversion of the Christian ideal of suffering for righteousness; these leftists are so twisted in the noggin they think the more they're suffering, the more righteous they are. Bonus points if someone from the "oppressor" class (White, male, not a fag, etc.) has a problem with it.
>>534139527>you can't just lock everyone up for 20+ yearsCorrect me if I'm wrong, but don't sentencing guidelines specifically recommend less time for a first offense, and more for repeat offenders?
>>534136797Thank the judge if you need to defend your izzat
>>534137029Nigger lover
>i was too lazy to pick my own cotton and now i am mad, thread #578447885
>>534139527>can’t lock everyone upWe literally can. Bukele turned El Salvador from the murder capital of the world into one of the safest countries in the world by locking everyone up. The US’s prison population needs to be several times larger than it currently is with most of the inmates being niggers. Crime is so rampant because there is no deterrence- high crime is a side effect of Democrat soft-on-crime policies (imagine that).My actual preference would be to just execute them instead of wasting tax money on irredeemable people but most of you aren’t ready for that conversation.
>>534136797>>534138014>>534139980Niggers over Jews and Jeets, go die in Iran.
>>534137186> I think we should just ban the dogs.And niggers
>>534136566good comic but the fucked up grammar pisses me off.
>>5341365661000%
>I AM SILLY AND EXTREMEBut at least you now have AI to do for you,why did I click in this board again?
>>534140235>Crime is so rampant because there is no deterrence- high crime is a side effect of Democrat soft-on-crime policiesCrime is so rampant because we have NIGGERS. Norway has extremely cushy prisons compared to the rest of the world and extremely low recidivism rates. But that shit only works when the people are of high quality.
>>534137186>>534140486Ok, that sounds reasonable, but what should we do with the current living "dogs"? Do we castrate them all? How do we track them all? Do we ban mixed races? Which races do we ban? What if unwanted mating happens? Should we just kill all races that we think are troublesome, despite everyone's opinion based on empty empathy? Do we tax the races to oblivion?It's a complex subject, I really want to see your opinions.
>>534136566I have an idea. I call it Judicial Accountability. Here's how it works:All felony cases have a Judicial Accountability time component in sentencing. So this is after guilt has been determined or agreed upon in a plea deal. Let's say the convicted faces a sentence range of 2 years to 20 years. If the judge hands out a 10 year prison sentence, the judge themselves face a 10 year judicial accountability period that starts upon release of the convicted either on parole or completion of sentence. If during that judicial accountability time the convict gets charged with another felony crime, the judge is named as a coconspirator in the new crime. Even retired or resigned judges face judicial accountability. This is how we place real "skin in the game" upon these fucking judges.
>>534136566I don't understand what kind of retard writes a comic and doesn't understand English. "so should judges" what? What are the judges doing?
>>534136566Judges held accountable for the crimes of criminals they let out of prison early? God double yes with the right to citizenship revoked and a side of bix nood.
>>534136566I agree, 100%I even always say that someone who pretends he's gonna start solving probrems, yet doesn't start by rounding corrupt jewdges, cops and ranked military, to hang them in front of their homes, is either a gullible cunt, or taking you for a very fuckable one
>>534141030>"so should judges" what?be accountable, numbnutsyou're a zoomlet, right?
Yes. >unpoliced politicians (and fake media)The system of fake representation is worked by manipulative thieves who wang control of the public purse AND the law. Them bringing a culture of institutional abuse and corruption to the judiciary is only natural.The system was never meant to “work”, it was meant to facilitate abuse of the people.Brainwashed media users should not be being used to elect basically divine right oppressors. The government should be policed by the people, it should be MORE policed than the people are. Politics should not exist in its current form and politicians must he policed by an inquisition free of all motivations to corruption. ALL MISERY, evil and destruction stems from this system of abuse.
>>534141030If dog nutters are held accountable [they aren't, by the way], so should judges.Seems like good English to me.
>wang*want. But that’s quite a kewl typoo so i’m leaving it. Pic: the effect of brainwashing addiction is greater and easier to cast upon those if lower iQ. But NOBODY AT ALL should be “watching” programming (which causes permanent physical brain damage), using msm or trick-tech sites & software. Ever.
>>534136566How popular do you think the fucking dogs porn category would be if it was legal?
>>534136566Absolutely.Most judges are cancer “restorative justice” retards and unfit for the bench.
>>534142013it used to be half of motherless
>>534141539I had one of those saws as a kid. My dad had a larger one. I have not seen one in years. What are they for? Were they obsolete when sawzalls came out?
>>534136566Yes 100%. The shitbull owner is vastly more evil than the shitbull. Likewise the judge is vastly more evil than the criminal nigger.
>>534138098That's not what they're thinking. They live out their cruelty and malice through the criminal they enable.
>>534142478>What are they for?sawing
>>534141539>>534141839Sorry you guys don't understand English. "so should judges" implies a future obligation while dog owners are accountable currently.
>>534144348>"so should judges" implies a future obligationno: it's a conditional implication, niggerwitsyou don't even speak English (which already is a simpler "form" of French, for simpler "minds), anywayyou only speak Mutt, lol, with such abominations as "different than" and the likefucking animal, lol
>>534144878Go eat your snails obongo
>>534144949your pypo die by falling into grease traps, lolyou're not one to lecture anyone about food, and certainly not the very best at it on the whole planet, and by far>obongorich from you to call anyone like that, since obongo is one of your presidents, lmao
