And if you don't agree you are jewish and very likely also a closet homosexual/atheist too.
>>534155752True and they should fire it at new York
>>534156179You have to add the London enclave as well for maximum effect.
The Iranians do have nukes, and that's the only reason American carriers couldn't move on the Iranian coast and support a ground invasion. They also have tons of sarin.The Iranians have three classes of missile that are nuclear capable, but like North Korea the main concern is actually that the Iranians may have nuclear landmines/Naval mines, or worse, that the QUDS may have such a weapon outside Iran which they could load onto a commercial cargo ship and blow up in an oil shipping lane.The isreali accusation that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, like everything Jewish, is a trick. It's a claim that Iran doesn't already possess nuclear weapons. Iran has been in a join Chinese-iranian-north korean nuclear weapons program and if nothing else the Chinese could simply give the Iranians warheads, and the North Korean already have nuclear warheads, so only a fool would believe that Iran didn't have access to nukes if they didn't already have a stockpile. The Iranians wouldn't have gone to all the trouble to enrich weapons grade uranium if they didn't already possess the bomb required to detonate that uranium. And this would be why Trump illegaly bombed Iran without congressional approval, to try to burry Iran's warheads. That attack was a total failure, he couldn't even collapse the entrances of Iran's main bunker network. Attempts to destroy Iran's heavy launch missiles were more convincing but Iran just fired one at a US base a thousand miles away just to make the point they can still send up nukes. Nobody should confuse the 1970s scuds Iran keeps in stockpile as barrage missiles with the 1990s fourth generation scuds, and modern missiles Iran has. The old scuds are only there to put pressure on isreali missile defence which costs 20 times more to deploy. Isreal and the US have spent trillions on shooting down hamas tin can rockets and Iranian SCUD-2, and now have a significant munitions deficit.
To put this into perspective:A 1000lb bomb/500kg only costs $4000, that's why the US can carpet bomb anyone who loses an air war against them. But a 1000lb JDAM, a guided bomb costs $30,000US. Still worth dropping on virtually any building, which is why so many JDAM packages were made. A SCUD-2 might cost two million, but doesn't require a bomber to carry it. That's why so many were made, they're actually cheaper at program level. An isreali interceptor, an arrow-2, might cost three million, because it needs significantly better guidance systems to intercept another missile, and to protect ground assets two if not three are fired to intercept a single SCUD-2Scud-4 are pseudonymous designation of modern scud type missiles, they cost the same as old ones but have better performance. You might hear them referred to as shahead-4, but there's a range of models in this category. The isreali arrow-3, might cost 4 million, generally used to shoot down SCUD-4US tomahawks are much better then scud, a nuclear capable cruise missile, but it's warheads is only 300kg (only) and might cost 4 million as well. So very quickly you see the issue here. Iran has been firing missile at isreali and US bases constantly and the Americans are haemorrhaging money to shoot them down, and striking Iranian positions costs just as much. This war is a very, very expensive business. And Iran produces oil so sort of recoups their costs daily so long as they aren't under embargo. How does the US and isreal recoup the costs of the war? When is the last time gulf states paid the US a trillion dollars to keep the Strait open?
