>4chan (feds) lie about history>Reddit (fags) lie about history>universities lie about history>kikes lie about history>nigs lie about history>Whites lie about history>books lie about history>internet lies about history>Bibles is not exhaustive historyWhere are the definitive, exhaustive, accurate, complete, unaltered, true sources on the events from human history? No angle, no spin, no omissions, no bullshit. I refuse to believe we are so retarded of a species that we would actually sabotage ourselves like this.Post sources here (if you're thinking of getting up to any funny business in my replies, consider blowing your brains out on your keyboard).
>>534163213DELETE THIS
Bumping because this thread is worthy of a bumpThere are no accurate complete and unaltered sources aside from the source itself
>>534163213I don’t think there’s any 100% pure source. Both for the reasons you listed and because even an ‘unaltered’ retelling of events can be influenced by personal bias so that while the facts didn’t change it implies they occurred in a specific way. Truth is lost a day after it takes place
>>534163213If you have a normal family, your ancestors are able to explain exactly anything what happened before you. As simple as it gets. External sources are biased by propaganda.
Bump
>star series books by Dwardu Cardona>ELECTRIC UNIVERSE.Book by David N. Talbott and Wallace Thornhill>Empires of Atlantis Marco M. Vigato >Nephilim looked like clowns part 1 part 2 coming this year >our dolphin ancestors by frank joseph>The Lost Civilization of Lemuria" by Frank Joseph>flying serpents and dragons by r a boulay >the missing lands by Freddy Silva>the book of the Hopi>the secrets of the federal reserve by eustace Mullins>the new Babylon those who reign supreme>crossing the rubicon by Michael c Rupert>the great taking by David Webb>1688 the first modern revolution >sex and culture by j d unwin>breeding the human herd by Edward Dutton>noble savages by Napoleon a chagnonI’ll post more
>men out of Asia by Harold glaring>hidden history by Jeffrey Doherty and Jim macgregor>ways that are dark by Ralph Townsend>twelve tribe nations by John Michell>final judgement vol 1 by Michael Collins piper>the purple dawn of creation by Troy d McLachlan >white gold by Giles Milton>killing the host by Michael Hudson >the collapse of antiquity by Michael Hudson>Vampire state by Ian Williams>the hoax of the 20th century by Arthur r butz >the myth of Andalusian paradise>defenders of the west and sword and scimitar by Raymond Ibrahim>forgotten civilisation by Robert m schoch
>colonialism by Nigel biggar>martin Bryant is he guilty or not? By dale r McGregor >the fame of a dead man’s deeds by Robert s griffin>principles of economics by Safran ammous>heaven on earth by Joshua muravchik >the case for colonialism by Bruce gilley>human accomplishment by Charles Murray>missing monarchy by Jeb smith >in defence of German colonialism by gilley>Fdr's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great DepressionThere’s probably more but I’m done posting unfortunately the true history is rather scattered into a million little pieces
>>534163213There are no true sources. At least, none that aren't isolated and fragmentary, to the point where even identifying them as "true" is difficult. Nearly any time someone writes something down, there is bias involved
>>534163213holy fuck they are lying about history.
>>534163213The Quran is the unaltered word of God. More than enough evidences to prove that only God can be the source and it has segments discussing history whether ancient or future prophecies. Since you believe there can never be a true source for history then that's the best you'll get. It isn't exhaustive but definitely more historically reliable than the Bible.
>>534166400Take your meds retard
>>534163213none exist you literal child, this is why you are taught to use multiple sourceseverything is written by people and everyone alive has bias, especially the ones that peacock about how they don'tso you use a bunch of sources and keep the consistencies
