The chinese successfully redefined socialism into something that works, and went from famines to extreme success.If you could lead your country and do the same, what would YOUR version of socialism look like?Mine would be called "Socialism with High IQ characteristics" and it would be:>free market with low taxes, so the economy can actually work, with only some exceptions>liberation of wagies, no more cagie: one can only work 5h a day in person at most, this would be effective big punishments and fines for deterrence>full socialization of women: no more tinder, no more approaching, no more chad only: the state would arrange relationships and women would be obedient and never say no>no police, so neighborhoods can naturally organize citizen patrols to hang any criminals and actually be much tougher and more efficient
Fuck china
>>534167293Cool bot threads MIGA tyranny, enjoy replying to your own spam
>redefinedThey just slapped 3000 years of bureaucracy back onto it. You cannot replicate this anywhere else.
DUDE! I FUCKING LOVE SLIDES
>>534167293/Lit/ is full of fucking retards.
>>534167293>into something that works, and went from famines to extreme successNo they didn't?
>>534167293Fascism.
>>534167722That's the answer to OP's image btw.
>>534167293It just required selling cheap shit to capitalist countries. Could it have worked if the Chinese economy remained isolated? No.
>>534167293Working system serves and help it people evolve and prosper....working system also keeping care about those who cannot survive without help...It has no matter is system communism, capitalism, theocracy, democracy, feodalism or technocracy. The way how it treat its people matter.
>>534167293I would use their scheme for political progression and the laboratory of the cities and provinces.>Don't achieve success?>Get firedIf you look at Xi's biography its just a long list of him getting shit done. I don't dispute he has political acumen but achievement is his main claim to legitimacy. Not "being on TV" or "having a superPAC" or "telling lies to Fox news boomers".
>>534167293>>534167722>>534167776Actually it's called legalism to the chinese
>>534168937Elaborate
>>534167857ok but if production is inefficient, there's famines, so the economic system matters, centrally planned economy is very different from market economy
>>534168083I disagree with this, he could be a genius and if he believed in Mao's system, China would still be awful. The best politician is the one who wants less power and to pass less laws.
>>534167293>Socialism with Chinese characteristicsSo National Socialism. You are afraid to call it what it is.
>>534170161I'm not sure national socialism was exactly the same, but tbf, you and the other anon who mentioned it are right, it is very close
>>534169944The best politician is the politician who achieves the most. Early in Xi's career he more than doubled the incomes of farmers in a single year. Not more than doubled his TV appearances, not more than doubled his campaign contributions, not more than doubled the number of donors he made promises to.
>>534170490Ok here's where we have fundamentally different views. I don't think politicians should achieve, I think they should let people achieve, and thats the way they can do best.The chinese economy is now less planned than with Mao, and so they're doing better because individual businesses are carrying the economy and the government is not as active in it.Europe was also doing better when govts had a smaller role in the economy, not doing so well these days in comparison.Japan is also declining because they keep raising taxes. Taxes are not necessarily theft, it's just a payment for a service the govt provides. It is of course mandatory, and coercive, but, it could, in principle, be still beneficial and worth it. The problem is, they shift control from the individual people to the government, and that's why they tank the economy, as the publicly provided services are less efficient.Basically the best way a politician can be successful and achieve is by doing less and interfering less.
>>534170490>Early in Xi's career he more than doubled the incomes of farmers in a single year.Ok but what if something happened to Xi? Would the incomes of those farmers be reduced again, without his supervision and management of their farms over the long term?Of course not! Because anyone else who believes in the opposite of what Mao stood for can do the same. Even an idiot could do it! All it takes is believing that the government should interfere less in people's lives and the economy.
>>534170394It is the closest thing, and the results speak for itself. However. The commerce of their industry is the backbone of their success.
litereally socialism with Nationalism built into it.China is a nation right? so chinese characteristics are inherently national characteristics. And the Han the natal majority of china are they not?Looks and sounds good to me. I support this ideology for all races.That excludes jews because they are a terrorist organization with and organized criminal network funding it.
>>534167293It worked because China destroyed their ancient diverse culture then centralized heavily and turned it into a monoethnic nation. Won’t work in the west because it’s too diverse now.
>>534167346Perfect picture depicting America everything about it is fake as fuck just like America nothing but lies for stupid people to believe as they suck off the corporate pedo elite who enslave them and extract their hard earned wealth !!!
>>534167293>The chinese successfully redefined socialismYeah they added the word 'National'
>>534171403Seethe harder chink tranny
>>534171812Seethe harder Qtard faggot.
>>534167293It's very simple, they didn't let the fake economy dominate the real one.
>>534172522But why didn't that work for Mao?
>>534172707>MaoNot a national socialist, power hungry grifter
>>534173620yeah but he alos didn't let the fake economy dominate the real one, so what did he do differently?
>>534167346Im pretty sure you want to fuck Trump, you just cant stop making the gayest Trump images In the entire internet.
> China in 2020sReal estate bubble has brust.Young people cannot get jobs.Deflation began. > China in 2030sCommunist Party ends by democratic revolution.
In China, a dictator appears every 60 years, stagnates society to a desperate degree, and then recovers after the dictator's death—that's the pattern.
>>534175191>Real estate bubble has brust.this is actually better>Young people cannot get jobs.>Deflation began.first world problems, they used to have famines instead, now china is where the latest technology and science is developed>Communist Party ends by democratic revolution.people support them though. idk how they don't resent them for the one child policy, but nowadays they like xi
>>534175359its different now because they're not doing like with mao anymore. i dont think they'll do that ever again
>>534167293Yeah, they are doing national-socialism
>>534167293>segregate whites and black niggers because it's not racism when it's the two of the degenerate jewish problems>force them into sharia law where whites are all treated like women and forced burkasthat's how you fix america so the natives can finally embrace real progressivism with the chinese
Has Chine secretly been national socialist all this time?
>>534167293>The chinese successfully redefined socialism into something that works, and went from famines to extreme success. By basically doing capitalism.
>>534167293>jewish funding and handholding from beginning to end socialism with chinese characteristics >jews hate to even mention for 100 yearsnational socialism on a side note, it should be studied how even such old socities end up worshipping some jew
