tldr: Said in his latest podcast Torah not containing the concept of seize fire is a clear and inacceptable deficiency. Christianity & Islam have it, Judaism must to adopt it, or else.How long until he realizes the true scope of what he said there?From here (58 mins in): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDljYM2oJHs > But the other thing is, if we compare between traditions, we have some conflicts that have to be resolved. And I would point out, I just started researching the question, you know, partially in light of the behavior of Israel in the Middle East, recently, does the Torah contain the concept of ceasefire? I don't think it does. So when Israel is attacking peace negotiators, that may be consonant with the particular book. Can we have a world in which powerful parties don't have a concept of ceasefire? I don't think that world is conceivable. It's not stable. It won't last. And so, you know, it is certainly true that the New Testament has this concept. Islam has it. So maybe the point is, well, that's actually a deficiency in the Torah that it's missing. And if we are to continue to live well on this planet, that's something that needs to be imported.Bottom line: Next time they tell you abut the "most moral army" ask them which moral framework they're talking about.
When Christianity came, Judaism became obsolete.Judaism shouldn't exist, but antichrists insisted in making it continue to exist after Christianity came to be.
