[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HHCRbOibAAArtA_.jpg (63 KB, 900x473)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
The man who stood on business. Goon business.

>The bill "prohibits the access, download, or use of nudification technology, except when the website, app, or software requires the substantial application of technological or artistic skill by a human creator directing and controlling the output," according to the House. It targets programs that use AI to fabricate a nude photo or pornographic video from someone's image.
>The bill passed on a vote of 132-1.

https://www.house.mn.gov/sessiondaily/Story/19118
>>
File: HHBnEq0WwAAwL1W.jpg (118 KB, 694x900)
118 KB
118 KB JPG
>>534181823
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/minnesota-house-passes-bill-banning-nudification-technology/
>>
>>534181823
>programs that use AI to fabricate a nude photo or pornographic video from someone's image
I don't think these retards realize that the program is just copy-pasting other people's genitals onto the source image, it's not actually undressing the person using computer magic
>>
>>534181823
The first amendment is pretty broad.
I bet Jessica gets nudified by the end of the day.
>>
>>534181823
we should also make it illegal to send mean messages to drew roach (r), district 58B
>>
>>534182088
But he's the only one who voted against the bill.
>>
File: 75234985702.jpg (113 KB, 768x768)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>534181823
I mean it's very hard to defend AI celebrity porn with anything other than MUH GOONING
If you weren't a gooner you wouldn't care about this
If the AI image was altered so it looked nothing like the target, you wouldn't get off
If the AI imagine represented nudity that was ridiculously out of proportion to the target's likely features, you wouldn't get off
If a version of the AI came out that was more realistic, you would prefer that over the less realistic one.
If the target made a personalized porn video for you, you would goon to that instead of the AI.

All of this points to one thing, you want to cooom to sexually exploitation of the target, and you don't care about ruining their life in the process, and you don't care about their consent.
That's a sex crime, it's not rape, it's not sexual abuse, it's not technically even revenge porn, but it's also not nothing.

so yeah, jail. Go to it.
>>
>>534181823
>Roach
I would change my last name. Wouldn't want people to equate me with a nasty disgusting bug.
>>
>>534181823
based gooner



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.