[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1777582987912.jpg (159 KB, 683x957)
159 KB
159 KB JPG
Should it be illegal to refuse to donate blood or a kidney to someone who’s dying, even if it’s a child? If a child in your family needed your kidney and you couldn’t or wouldn’t give it, should the law force you to or send you to prison?

If your answer is no because that violates bodily autonomy, a basic human right, then you already understand the argument for legal abortion. No one is required to give up bodily autonomy for someone else, no matter their age or relationship.

You might call it murder, but even laws around killing have exceptions. Self defense is legal when someone’s life is at risk. If abortion were banned in every situation, even when the mother’s life is in danger, then by that logic self defense shouldn’t exist either. But it does.

Most people wouldn’t accept losing their bodily autonomy or their right to stay alive, so it’s worth considering what it means to take that right away from others.
>>
I don't want anyone to profit from my death. If it were up to me the entire planet would explode when I die as if I don't exist then nobody should exist. So no I don't want anyone to get my blood or organs.
>>
The healthiest organs are in the healthiest people.
Those organs are needed the most
>>
>>534195740
>So no I don't want anyone to get my blood or organs.
Okay. But why does that require the entire planet to explode
>>
So basically what that redditor is syaing is that if they needed a kidney and mine would be a match for him I legally could shoot him in the head to protect my body
>>
>>534196250
If I die then everyone should die with me. Billions must die.
>>
>against their will
They were raped?
>>
>No one is required to give up bodily autonomy for someone else
You had sex
You understood pregnancy to be a result of sex
You accepted the pregnancy
>>
>>534195614
depends, what race is it
>>
>>534195614
The good old Free will / morality question.
Good luck with that.
>>
File: depop.jpg (3.82 MB, 4200x9944)
3.82 MB
3.82 MB JPG
>>534195614
too many people op
billions must die
>>
>No one is required to give up bodily autonomy for someone else, no matter their age or relationship
You're not "giving up bodily autonomy". You had complete and utter autonomy over your body, and now you have to deal with the consequences of your own free actions.
Sex could lead to pregnancy. Conception is the creation of a new human life. You understand the risks and have unprotected sex without contraception anyway. You're a fucking retard and I have no sympathy for you if you screech and scream for the ability to kill your own child so you can continue to let strange men cum in you until the end of time.
>>
>>534195614
If a cop thinks you are dui they can take you to the hospital, strap you down and forcefully draw blood out of your body.
>>
>>534195614
You know drinking bleach is easier and more rewarding than being wrong, dumb, and jewish.
>>
>we have this concept of "bodily autonomy", it's this cultural notion that a person's control over their own body is above all important and must not be infringed upon
>anyway, chop off the tip of this baby's cock and inject him 45 times in the first 6 months of his life
>anyway, if you don't get the covid shot we'll force you into camps, segregate you, fire you and strip you of your livelihood
You really thought you were on to something, weren't you?
>>
>>534195614
Just close your legs.
It's not hard.
>>
>>534195614
You've premised your argument off of the idea that your organs ought to go towards someone whose organs are failing. You recognize, in the bones of your argument, that there are functioning and non-functioning states for organs in the human body. Taking my liver to save someone whose liver is failing is a statement to the preservation of health. So, how in the fuck do you legitimize the halting of a woman's womb that's operating fully functionally after she's engaged in healthy consensual activity with her body? Justify that for me, why do women have a right to halt healthy function within their body when no one anywhere else has a right to terminate their own healthy functions (except in Canada, because fuck Canada).
>>
File: Abortion.png (102 KB, 1179x1380)
102 KB
102 KB PNG
>>534195614
>If abortion were banned in every situation, even when the mother’s life is in danger, then by that logic self defense shouldn’t exist either.
There's still time to correct your mother's failure, OP.
BE AN HERO!!!
>>
>>534195614
That's interesting, sorry it happened or happy for you. Whichever is the correct response to your drivel.

Now, have you heard about the talmud and how Jews are allow to rape and murder non Jew children and it's not a crime. Did you hear that Jews are not allowed to be punished for things like this in court because of protections granted under the law for Jews alone. So they can rape and murder you and children. And your government lets them leave without question.
>>
>>534195614
>If your answer is no because that violates bodily autonomy, a basic human right, then you already understand the argument for legal abortion. No one is required to give up bodily autonomy for someone else, no matter their age or relationship.

Wrong. A woman's right to bodily autonomy doesn't apply to being pregnant because she gave implied consent to carry a child when she decided to have sex. Even if her plan wasn't to get pregnant, she still engaged in sexual activity knowing that pregnancy could result from it.

>B-b-but what about rape

Abortion should still be illegal for that because that is punishing another person (the fetus) for the crime of the rapist. Punishing someone for a crime someone else committed is generally considered unconstitutional in the US.
>>
>>534195614
>jeet: I raped her because my life was in danger
>>
File: israeli organ harvesting.jpg (1.7 MB, 2000x2000)
1.7 MB
1.7 MB JPG
>>534195614
I don't even have to check if that author is jewish.
>>
No vaxxie
You can’t have what’s not yours
>>
>>534195614
>born a woman
>omg it is a tragedy!!!!!
then kys and try again
>>
>>534195614
Not really a donation if it’s legally coerced is it
>>
>>534195614
>Should it be illegal to refuse to donate blood or a kidney to someone who’s dying, even if it’s a child

Sure if only White people existed. But there are subhumans around so no.
>>
>>534195614
>My body my choice
Unless it's a covid vaccine
>>
>>534195614
Write your own response essay, kid.
>>
>>534195614
None of us have bodily autonomy. If we did, we could legally sell kidneys, bone marrow, etc. Talk to me about bodily autonomy when I can sell a kidney to the highest bidder.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.