[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: image.jpg (194 KB, 962x983)
194 KB
194 KB JPG
Is it necessary for a country's population to increase for the economy to perform well and grow every year? Are metrics like GDP and inflation rates correlated to population growth?
>>
>>534197385
no pop growth = stagnant economy
>>
>>534197385
Our problem right now isn't growth, it's sustainability. Feminism = no babies. Every nation that has women in the workforce is below replacement level. Civilization will eventually disappear. (Or be overtaken by non-feminist cultures like islam.)
>>
File: pepe5.jpg (37 KB, 444x330)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>534199943
Although Japan's population is declining, life is becoming more comfortable year by year.
Twenty years ago, Japan's GDP was the second largest in the world, but life was difficult at that time.
>>
>>534197385
GDP is a function of population, which is why in the past (like the 16/1700s) India was a large part of the global economy: population dominated the rest of the contributions to GDP. But then the industrial revolution happened, and GDP (to an extent) became decoupled from population, now a single man could do the work of 10. This is why India's share of global GDP fell during the 1700/1800. But, if you look at China, their GDP is very large. In fact as a percentage of global GDP they are about 14%. However they also have about 14% of the worlds population. So, a large population can still lead you to have a large percentage of global GDP.

I guess what I'm trying to say is GDP is correlated to population, but perhaps not in the way you might think. Moreover, just because a country has a high GDP doesn't mean that they have a large population and visa versa.
>>
>>534197385
>GDP and inflation rates correlated to population growth?
None of this matters. GDP = Goy Docility Progress, inflation = money counterfeiting. When they bring in more brown people it means they can play games when they say something like "average government debt per person". But the brown retards they're bringing in are a net-negative tax wise. Do you know who loves these useless metrics, "managers". You know the corporate jargon where they say terms like "KPIs". That's all this shit is.

You aren't an economic zone. You're not a human resource. The Jews that have subverted our countries have no idea what they're doing and only care about themselves and gaslight you into think that they give a shit about you and telling you things are great so they can keep draining from you like vampires.

We don't need "more" people. We need better people. And of course, that implies eugenics. Which could be done entirely peacefully but to disgenic people this is considered the worst evil because they can see it means the end of their genetic lines. And so things must just play out. Either they ruin the human race or we take the reigns back. Our choice really. But for a start can you stop taking the managerial circus seriously? Thank you.
>>
>>534197385
That green line looks fun.
Count us in.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.