Another U.S. Navy ship fire https://maritime-executive.com/article/u-s-navy-destroyer-suffers-serious-fire-in-the-indo-pacific
>>534201172>Things break sometimes Breaking news!
>when you bomb your enemies back into third century BC
>>534201172https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPT3SIrCo5Q
if a ship was actually hit, would they tell us?
>>534201172Toilets on fire!>again
Wow it's like sailors don't want to be sitting ducks and die for Jews or something.
>>534201172>Shoves paint can inside burn bucketThat'll do
>>534201172Is that the one that triple-tapped the Iranian girls' school?
>>534201172I really hope it's a laundry fire again
>>534201797Yes. Theyll tell us it had an unspecified fire/mechanical issue and has to return to port. Any dead or wounded will just be casualties of the fire/mechanical problem. If it sinks, theyll just claim the problem couldnt be contained so the scuttled the ship. If videos of this show up, theyll call them AI.So yes theyll tell us, but they wont say Iran struck and sunk a ship.
>>534202409Worse, they (reportedly) went dead in the water, lost both propulsion plants & all electrical power. Burke destroyers are powered by 4 GE LM2500 Gas turbine main engines for propulsion and 3 RR gas turbine generators for electrical power so it's much more serious than a laundry fire
>>534202079Good question
>>534201172Nah muttsisters, its just another laundryroom mutiny. nothing to worry about.
>>534201172>Complex systems will not survive the competence crisis
