Lawsuit seeking to ban circumcision as discriminatory genital cutting passes crucial legal test https://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/2025/10/lawsuit-seeking-to-ban-circumcision-as-discriminatory-genital-cutting-passes-crucial-legal-test.html>Pic related Civil attorneys Lake Perriguey, left, and Eric Clopper appeared in court in October 2025When the state showed up to defend the legality of routine mutilation of baby boys they sent all female attorneys…… https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aESlINRqhJsAlso Eric clopper the attorney trying to get circumcision banned is currently raising money on go fund me as theres many many other states in which this needs to happen in >“They suffered stigmatic harm by being treated as lesser than, or be given less legal rights, because of their sex,” Eric Clopper, lead counsel for the circumcised men, said in an interview Monday. He also said they were injured physically.>The suit, filed in March on behalf of several circumcised men, alleges they suffered unlawful sex discrimination because Oregon lawmakers banned female genital mutilation of children in 1999 but allowed male genital cutting to continue.>Multnomah County Circuit Judge Melvin Oden-Orr issued an oral ruling Thursday finding that the plaintiffs have standing in other words, that there’s a valid allegation of harm that could be fixed by winning a lawsuit.
It’s hypocritical to be against circumcision of infant human boys but not against castration of pigs.If you buy pork at grocery stores or restaurants in the united states you are almost certainly paying for pigs to be castrated without anesthetic
>>534256440If you’re maleImagine a tiny rubber band placed around your scrotum so that your testicules under the rubber band eventually rot offsounds extremely painful
>>534256555
>>534256440>>534256555IDF is fast
Circumcision is why trans children will not be outlawed. >the parents consent
>>534256838Nick Fuentes was right about trump on this issue 100%The problem is Nick is a catholic and the church is fucked. Pro usury , doesn’t say it’s immoral to do routine infant baby boys circumcision, doesn’t name the Jew, says Muslims and Catholics worship the same God, infallible contradictions and reversing of positions, etc
>>534256662Israel has one of the highest percentages of vegans out of any country and the IDF is one of the most vegan militaries in the world
>>534257222They also have the highest percentage of faggots in the world.
>>534257352okay but if veganism is a conspiracy ny Jews to make goyim weak it makes no sense why they’d also go vegan
>>534257508The IDF might be full of pajeets.
>>534258086It seems to be jews going vegan
Biblical circumcision was nowhere near as invasive. The fake kikes turned it into genital mutilation.
>>5342565554U
>>534258621true but that was also bad it’s just worse today >>534258692
>>534256220these are great for news
>>534259268It saddens me more people don’t spend more time and money on intactivism especially given how much time and money is spent on luxuries. Circumcising babies is very bad and very common so theres lots of low hanging fruit like how against malaria foundation can save a life for 5000 dollars
>>534259461rich people need their baby foreskin cream. im not joking.
>>534256220Honestly, I don't get why people lose their minds over this. It’s just a little bit of skin, right? Like, we’re not talking about chopping off fingers or anything. The way some of you go on about it, you’d think every circumcised guy walks around traumatized, clutching his phantom foreskin or something. Spoiler alert: most don’t even think about it. It’s like clipping your nails - yeah, you’re technically removing part of your body, but who’s crying over it? Life moves on.Here’s the thing: the practice has been around for thousands of years. You’re not exactly uncovering a secret conspiracy here. People have done it for religious reasons, hygiene reasons, cultural reasons, whatever. Sure, maybe it’s not 100% medically necessary in most cases these days, but guess what? Neither is eating kale, and I don’t see anyone frothing at the mouth about that. The idea that it’s some grand violation is just peak internet hyperbole. Not everything is a moral battleground, and not every parenting decision needs to be dissected like it’s a Supreme Court case.Don’t get me started on the 'my body, my choice' crowd suddenly going full activist for infant foreskins. Give me a break. You guys sound EXACTLY like feminist retards and it's so tiresome. Babies don’t get a choice in anything. Not their vaccines, not their bedtime, not even the ugly onesies their mom buys. Are we going to start holding public debates about those too? 'Baww, my parents didn’t let me choose my haircut when I was five, I’m so oppressed!' Fuck off.At the end of the day, what’s the big deal? Are you going to sit there on your high horse crying over foreskins while the world burns around you? This is a non-issue dressed up as a crisis, and the only reason it’s even a debate is because people on the internet need something to scream about. If you don’t want to circumcise your kid, don’t. If you do, then do. But the idea that it’s worth all this drama? Nah, man. Touch grass, get a hobby, and chill.
>>534259718I checked and apparently they used to doThat but now it seems they may be lab grown from yeast The cell lines already exist so I don’t really see the demand pressure But hospitals and doctors or whoever can make money by charging for performing the unnecessary procedure >>534259904Hypocrisy. If women can routinely get millions of dollars, 100% VA disability ratings or put a man in jail for years because of mean words and or forced sex even if the sex did not do significant permanent irreversible physical damage then men and boys should get millions of dollars and doctors should be jailed for years because modern male circumcision usually does more permanent significant irreversible physical damage than the average rape. It removes many structures . Plus the victim is an innocent baby rather then an adult woman.
>>534259904There are highly cost-effective interventions that could prevent one circumcision per dollar or more in expectation.If we assume this reduces sexual pleasure by 20%( Most estimates seem to range between 10% and 90%, (Do note sexual sensation/pleasure is different than sexual satisfaction, effects on sexual satisfaction seem to be much smaller (although there is also very similar life satisfaction after couple years between new lottery winners and newly acquired paraplegics—cf. narrative life satisfaction vs. direct hedonic wellbeing) and it is notable that there is significant methodological difficulty in objectively measuring differences in pleasure, resulting in significant uncertainty here—although there is high information value in investigating further) and that sexual pleasure accounts for 5% of life happiness (I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think that a male with no sexual pleasure has lost at least 5% of his overall happiness on average; of course some males value much higher and some much lower) for average males we could get a rough Fermi estimate of 5% x 20% = 1% reduction in life satisfaction, and if we very, very crudely say that this is similar to losing 1% of 5O years of QALYs, this would be losing .5 QALYs per circumcision, and preventing one circumcision for one dollar would be 2$ per QALY.I think malaria nets - Givewell’s perennial top charity ( https://www.givewell.org/international/technical/programs/insecticide-treated-nets ) - are estimated to be about $50 per QALY, so even estimates that were extremely more conservative, like if an intact foreskin only accounts for 5% of sexual pleasure (Despite being 1/3 to 1/2 the skin of the penis, being probably most of the nerve endings and almost all of the fine-touch nerve endings of the penis, in addition to providing several significant sexual functions important for both male pleasure and female comfort and vastly increased masturbatory pleasure)
>>534259904A twitch streamer was recently allegedly hugged without her consent. She says she's a victim of sexual assault and has received emotional damages, people are talking about lawsuits and extremely large amounts of money being owed to her by the man who allegedly hugged her and twitch itself for failing to adequately protect her. The laws in the United States seem to be written in such a litigious way she may have a case and be owed hundreds of thousands of dollars.But this twitch streamer who was allegedly assaulted isn't vegan. She regularly pays for hens to be debeaked without anesthetic, male chicks to be thrown into blenders on their birthday, piglets to be castrated without anesthetic, pigs to be put in gas chambers, cows and calves to be separated right after birth, pigs and cows to be raped / artificially inseminated, etc etc.Isn't it hypocritical for her to say she's a victim and deserves restitution (like a lawsuit and money being given to her by twitch and the man who allegedly assaulted her) and retribution ( like the man who allegedly assaulted her being imprisoned) while she is paying for so many animals to be horribly abused?I think this woman doesn't deserve a penny in restitution. I believe all of her property down to the clothes on her back should be confiscated from her, liquidated and given to HER victims.https://animalcharityevaluators.org/https://sharkonline.org/http://anonymousforthevoiceless.org/>but murder isn't that badALL MURDERERS SHOULD DIE IN PRISON.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OR_Bn9SRXNU [Open]>but how do you know animals can feel pain?We can assume other adults, children and some animals can feel pain based on things like brain structures they have and behaviors. Claiming pigs, piglets, cows etc can't feel pain is really no different then claiming babies who are circumcised without anesthetic can't feel pain. (Obviously it's also immoral with anesthetic)
>>534256220YWDS
>>534260521>>534259904and sexual pleasure only accounts for 2% of overall life satisfaction, it would still be equally effective as bed nets.More importantly in my opinion, I think most of the harm of circumcision comes from extremely severe PTSD and trauma suffered in rare cases, as evidenced in the Reddit “circumcision grief” ( https://www.reddit.com/r/CircumcisionGrief/ ) a few studies, and numerous anecdotal accounts I could give. I think some lives are made negative at a ratio of 10:1 to 1,000:1 negative to positive experiences. I would personally say I am in the 10:1 to 100:1 category, despite having healed my PTSD after about three years of it, most men don’t. I suspect it is extremely unlikely my life will ever become positive without life extension/other trans-humanist technology.I think it is not unreasonable to estimate that 1 in 10,000 men have their lives made net negative at a 10:1 negative to positive ratio (and/or equivalently, made 1:1 negative to positive ratio for 1 in 1,000 men, or 10% worse for 1 in 100 men.) In fact, I think this is conservative based on what I’ve seen; remember this is an experience of genital mutilation as perceived and experienced from the perspective of these men, I don’t think we would question this in the case of female or intersex genital mutilation, and the extraordinarily severe lifelong PTSD that can result. In fact, my understanding is that infant death, loss of the entire penis, and very severe complications leading to permanent extremely limited sexual capability due to circumcision are, combined, far more common than 1/10,000.
>>534259904>>534260628That would mean that there is very, very roughly the equivalent of about 50 QALYs (~average American lifespan) lost per 1000 circumcisions, or about 1 QALY per 20 circumcisions. I think the extreme suffering here should count for significantly more, as I think a prioritarian, ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prioritarianism#:~:text=Prioritarianism%20is%20one%20interpretation%20of%20distributive%20justice%20and%20is%20often%20pitted%20against%20egalitarianism. ) suffering-biased ethic is probably correct (extreme suffering should be weighed more heavily than average happiness.) And I think the real numbers are possibly much worse than what I stated, perhaps by a factor of 10 or more. But even on this conservative estimate, at one dollar per circumcision prevented, this would be very roughly $20 per QALY, which is again surpisingly good.Section 2I think there may be some hits-based leveraged bets that could be 10X to 100X more effective in expectation;For example, funding scalable trauma treatment (I was working on this and was quite close to finishing a book, and then next was plainning to create a scalable healing program, but burned out and had to quit, partially due to disability and severe funding constraints.) Currently quality circumcision trauma healing is extremely hard to find, so this would be a huge boon, and since I’ve already completed most of the work this can be completed relatively cheaply.I think $10,000,000 could double the chances of foreskin regeneration happening soon, or perhaps bring it forward by 10 or 20 years in expectation, and I know people who are actively seeking funding to make this happen. Once the procedure is available this can be self-funding - an estimate based on Aella's research https://www.hegemonmedia.com/p/survey-data-shows-the-foreskin-regeneration gives a
>>534260705$200+ billion market for foreskin regeneration, another indication of value - and as a cultural phenomenon this could lead to much lower circumcision rates or even speed the banning of it in developed countries.I know some native activists in sub-Saharan Africa ( My understanding is that circumcision is not at all cost-effective for fighting AIDS compared to other interventions, even if the studies were accurate, but there are some very severe flaws in the studies and more recent research contradicting that there is any positive effect—although strong caveat that I haven’t looked into this deeply. ) who are fundable for a very, very, very small fraction of what US work costs, making this potentially extremely cost-effective, and it is unfortunately highly under-funded. One obstacle here is that we would need some infrastructure set up to make these activists more fundable and effective.So, all things considered, I think if we are serious about improving the world, we should not dismiss this out-of-hand and at least do a deeper dive into this to confirm how cost-effective it in fact is. All of these are quite rough estimates, hence why I tried to be conservative, deeper research would be needed to confirm.*Note I did not count flow-through effects here for most of this, and I think flow-through effects could be quite significant.AlsoCheck out the health equity campaign (HEC) https://intaction.org/intactpac/ put on by Intaction. They’ve prevented circumcision from being added to Medicaid in some states, which is known to significantly reduce rates, so for probably something small, I would guess less than $100,000, I would say in expectation they’ve prevented something like 5,000 circumcisions per year as long as these policies stay in place, which could be for several years or even decades, which could mean as low as $1-$2 per unnecessary circumcision prevented.
>>534260749Much more importantly, Intaction is now lobbying at the capital, and this is the first time this has happened in US history. It will be much harder to have an impact, but the impact could be much higher if it at all adds momentum to broad public debate on the topic and ultimately to the (at least nonreligious) practice being banned completely in the United States, which could have a serious ripple effect throughout the world considering a lot of nonreligious circumcision that exists in other countries has been due to US cultural and pseudo-medical influence ( I think it’s very clear that circumcision has far more medical harms than benefits if you look at the data, and agree that in the US the practice is best conceptualized as genital mutilation intended to prevent sexual pleasure and punish masturbation, which is where its roots in the the Victorian age in the US and UK originated, with attempts only coming much later to justify it medically. )I would also check out Eric Clopper and his lawsuit in Oregon with his organization Intact Global https://www.intactglobal.org/ . Establishing the unfathomably severe harm of the practice with a win in the courts seems quite plausible, especially in Oregon where rates are very low, and there’s no question the practice violates equal protection. This could help lead the way to a state ban, which again could be crucial for momentum toward more state bans and eventually a national conversation and potential ban.Importantly, I think both of these are taking relatively conservative approaches and not trying to challenge religious circumcision directly which is what defeated the attempted ban in San Francisco.
>>534260801
>>534260945meat eaters pay for this
>>534256220I think they're taking the wrong approach. They should instead be suing to be able to perform female circumcission, and using all the arguments which are used for male circumcision. Get someone to publish a study on how it's "healthier". Then either the court has to legalize it (will never happen), or if they reject it you have the case to ban male circumcision as well
>>534258890Nothing commanded by God is bad.
>>534259904Shalom. Literal Jewish pasta.Stop chopping off baby dicks, retard, this is not rocket science.Why are you trying to keep it going if it's not important?Fucking shill. I hope you get your comeuppance.
>>534259904Shut the fuck up, kike. No more forskins for you, you've damage enough of us as is, THE RITUAL BLOOD OFFERINGS END NOW.
>>534261361If you are not a lawyer in usa idk why you are so confident that is more effective >>534261376Yes but If someone claims God commanded them to do something which seems obviously immoral like rape a baby that is good evidence that that person did not actually get a command from God since God would not command something immoral
>>534260945>>534260974Anyone buying low grad eggs pay for this.Meat came from young chickens not from female birds.This mass killing of males is done by the egg industry, and any vegetarian can eat eggs.The problem here is buying cheap industrial product, not eating meat.Always buy local organic food, or from your local farmers, and you won't participate in bad animal conditions.
>>534262977Local small family farms can still do bad things like castration without anesthetic Besides those happy animals were executed when they lived a small fraction of their total happy healthy lifespan. If an animal is living a mostly good life then it is wrong to end their mostly good life by executing themIf an animal is living a mostly bad life then it is wrong to breed them into existence.
>>534263260Those animals only exist because of humans. Pigs wouldn't exist, they used to be boars. Cows wouldn't exist, they used to be Aurochs.
Foreskin is functional tissue. It really is that simple. The entire "argument" from the pro-dick mutilation freaks is lies from institution backed "researchers" and dehumanization of the natural male form. It's frankly EMBARRASSING it took this long for this open complicity in crimes against humanity got recognized. I hope they all hang.
>>534264050I don’t see how that in any way justifies it. If humans created conscious AI sex dolls that would not justify mistreating them
>>534264164Circumcision is an issue Thats so obviousBecause even mainstream ish people who are pro vaccine pro immigration etc will admit circumcision is bad. It’s something the far left and far right can agree on
>>534263260>Local farm can still do bad thingsYeah, so just vote with your money and buy elsewhere. What's hard to understand?>Killing is badThink what you want, we need meat to fully function.Take complement if you want, it won't replace meat.I prefer to eat meat once a week, but from a good source than slop each days, or supplements.Go kill dogs and cats because they hunt in nature.Go kill all carnivore animal if you want to follow that route.
>>534264411People are cowards, sadly. Oh well, bash their faces in with truth anyway. If they die, they die. If they live, they repent and move on.
>>534264313>muh robotsYou can't mistreat a robot.
>>534256220If only Muslims did circumsicion, everyone would agree that it's a backwards barbaric practice with no place in a modern society, and everyone would be right. We all know exactly why the practice is still defended with vigorous pilpuling anywhere in the west.
This kills judaism.
>>534264806We don’t need meat as there’s healthy adult people who have been vegan their entire lives from a vegan pregnancy It’s also unfortunate when a dog kills a mouse just as it’s unfortunate when a 3 year old human being shoots and kills his 1 year old sibling
>>534265076Jewish supremacy is part of it but also men and boys are seen as disposable and subservient . No one cares about men
>>534264846Trying to define “human” can be tricky also, if you’re making the argument only humans should have rights and only humans can be victims of murder or abuse it can lead to absurdities.That’s what arguments like name the trait are forDo androids dream of electric sheap and blade runner . Is a good argument for veganism>rights are only for humansDefine human. Is the android killed in this scene “human” ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oz4sKOXsYJ8Are gmo’ed crispr humans who look and act like you and me human even if they are technically a different species and unable to reproduce with Homo sapiens?
>>534265842Humans can't live vegan without supplements and you know it.You are delusional that's it.Carnivores needs meat to survive, you can't make a cat vegetarian, let alone vegan.You can't compare animal hunting with sibling murder, that's retarded.
>>534265993You can abuse an animal, you can't abuse a machine, because a machine cannot be alive by definition.You are insane if you think a robot can be alive. But you're a vegan so that goes without saying. As much as I like animals, humans are an apex predator and as such they feed off of other animals. This is just a fact, you can cope all you want.
>>534266080Okay but iodine costs like 10 cents per person per year. B12 costs pennies a day or lessMost meat eaters are deficient in vitamin D so it’s something people should be supplementing regardless of vegan or not Vegan cats who have been vegan from being a kitten who are indoor and don’t hunt exist
>>534266258I disagree https://benthams.substack.com/p/can-artificial-intelligence-be-consciousI don’t think conscious non living beings exist yet but I think they probably eventually will
>>534266444I don't care. They can't be alive.Animalist and transhumanist, what a weird combination. It's all clearer when you realize what these two groups have in common is that they hates humans.
>>534256220>Eric ClopperHow did no one post this one ITT yet. Fucking newfags I swear
>>534266607In Steven Pinker's The Better Angels of Our Nature Why Violence Has DeclinedLuria presented syllogisms like these:- "In the Far North, where there is snow, all bears are white. Novaya Zemlya is in the Far North. What color are the bears there?"Typical response: "I don't know. There are different sorts of bears." (When pressed: "I wasn't there, I can't say what bears there are there... If a person hasn't been there he can't say anything on the basis of words. If a man was 60 or 80 and had seen a white bear and told me about it, I could believe him."- "Precious metals do not rust. Gold is a precious metal. Does it rust?"Typical response: "It depends on what kind of gold it is. If it's real gold it doesn't rust, but if it's fake it does... If it's precious, it doesn't rust."- "There are no camels in Germany. The city of B is in Germany. Are there camels in B?"Typical response: "There probably aren't any in B... Perhaps there are. If it's a large city, there might be camels there." (When asked to deduce strictly from the premises: "If the city is a large one, perhaps there are camels there.")Pinker comments that these respondents were not intellectually deficient in practical terms they were intelligent within their lived experience but they resisted "the very idea of operating on abstract categories detached from the world, such as 'all bears in places with snow.'" He ties this to the Flynn effect:>The IQ of an average American in 1910... would be about 70 by today's standard... at the border of mental retardation... The difference lies mainly in abstract reasoning."
>>534266692It’s funny because he’s ethnically Jewish Nice guy tho
>>534266692The rebuker.
>>534256555>>534256440it's a woman criticizing a woman for being insensitive about hating men because she used a tool used on animals.animals are friends! but hating men is fine
>>534266753Oh Pinker, the jew who was buddy with Epstein.Good night.
>>534266973Im a vegan man who is also against circumcision and I posted that Shes a vegan lesbian from the uk, not a lot of circumcision happening there today except Muslims
>>534256440true>>534256662can't speak for him but he's right about this pointi don't defend circumcision at all, it shouldn't be legal to force it on someoneit's still hypocritical to oppose it only for some while the same and much worse is done to animals
>>534256594>women
>>534256220Wake me up when doctors are being hanged publicly for crimes against humanity.
>>534258413"spiteful mutants"
>>534256220>harming people is illegal>raping children is illegal>harming children is illegalThe real controversy should be about the pedophile Freemason police not immediately arresting these child abusers. Laws are irrelevant to the people protecting Jeffrey Epstein and his clients.
>>534267289>>534267289It’s definitely battery legallyE Jean Carroll got a 5 million dollar verdict against trump just for battery The 80 million was separate and for defimation .
>>534267635Law enforcement has nothing to do with enforcing laws. They are a private military funded by taxpayers to protect the wealthy and corporate interests. The entire law enforcement and judicial establishment is invalid until they prosecute the Epstein accomplices.
>>534257093>catholicBrownshit detected
Bump
>>534270954It’s also feminist Should not be requiring men to get a marriage license to get married in a Catholic Church but they doLegal marriage is dumbAs a man you need to be able to walk away at any time and kick her to the curb
>>534266297>doesn't cost muchStill involve way more transformations and pollution creating that just eating eggs.>Most meat eaters are deficient in vitamin D so it’s something people should be supplementing regardless of vegan or notYour point being? People have bad eating habits so instead of eating good quality food, they should continue ingesting slop and take pills on top of that?I never saw a wolf taking vitamin D pills.>Vegan cats who have been vegan from being a kitten who are indoor and don’t hunt existNo they don't and you know it.Well, I mean, if your cat dies after one month, it will effectively has been vegan it's whole life.The handful of example I read about always find a way to snatch meat here or there, and were way more healthy even with the trash the industry calls "dry food".Same solution as number 2, give good quality food to your pets, they will be healthier.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore
>>534256220>When the state showed up to defend the legality of routine mutilation of baby boys they sent all female attorneysbecause jews
>>534257352>>534257222>Israel has one of the highest percentages of vegans out of any country and the IDF is one of the most vegan militaries in the world>They also have the highest percentage of faggots in the world.also highest percentage of pedos in the world.
>>534256220That's based. It's going to happen eventually as the older folks pass on. I'm sure there's going to be cataclysmic levels of kvetching
>>534259904Literally I feel threatened. I'm sending the police to your house. The babies cry and pass out from the procedure. It's called post natal trauma and it affects your subconscious forever.I hate Jews so fucking much. Always using rhetoric and shifting goalposts to make their goals happen. Fuck you.
>>534267635Surely the parents consented. So the victims of circumcision would be suing their own parents?
>>534257093christ cucks are fucking retarded but I believe catholics expressly forbid it in some catechism or whatever.
>>534274040You can't give someone consent to rape and mutilate your child you stupid nigger.
I can’t wait for the day it’s banned worldwide and the people who practiced it go to prison as child molesters. Feels good knowing it will 100% happen within our lifetimes.
>>534274804Let's see what the legal process delivers.
>>534275087Until all kike worshippers aka christians are killed it will never be banned.
>>534274670I wishThey should say it’s immoral to circumcise babies but they don’t They just say it’s optional
>>534256220good.
>>534259904
>>534256220Wish them the best. This is one of the biggest and most important causes of our time.
>>534256220>>534277233Reading through the thread, you can tell how scared they are of this ever succeeding, look at how they desperately try to derail, misdirect, shame, etc Disgusting snakes.
>>534256220Parental guardian of your unit decided upon themselves to remove physical sensors from the tip of your benis from your meatsuit in this timeline which you cannot undo. You have been desensitized and marked like cattle. You are now part of the NPC spectrum that cannot comprehend what sensations are felt from having said foreskin. At least we can educate future fathers to not fuck up their son’s lives when they get thrown into this timeline. The psychological trauma you had to endure when you escaped the womb is part of the reason why you are calloused and numb. Remember those blood curdling screams? You can be in denial all you want. Just understand sex in vagene is incredible when your exterior benis skin doesnt have a layer of keratin. How can you make judgement of what is bad and not bad on perceptions of sensors that are not physically there? Is your foreskin in the room with us now or does it just haunt you only in your mind? Your neurons sent blaring signs of WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU MAKE YOUR NEWBORN CRY IN PAIN AND INFLICT HARM as you listen to your son cry for help while you give permission. Psychopaths are not born, they are created through trauma. To get strapped into and held against your will and not your choice of getting what gives you pleasure that you will never experience be removed. Physical wounds heal. That is why we, the ones in our original form that God (whatever God you pray to) embedded in your genetics and chromosomes and intended us to be, to educate you so the mental wounds would scar over and remind you of the dumb goylem you were destined to be. Tell me again how pretty your dick looks literally marked like cattle and using it as rebuttal, not having the realization to cope. Dont be like your parents you fuckin goylem.
>>534256440>do humans get different things than animals?I'll be you're a fat female human.you'll just be ignored like a bitch bleeding out on a bus nobody cares
>>534259461I don’t want to save the lives that modern malaria takes. I want to save the lives of my people first. Compassion starts near and then goes far. The false modern compassion for far away people is nothing more than a rationalization to avoid doing good where one actually can. In ones self, with one’s family, one’s community, one’s nation and people then abroad. It’s so easy to be righteous and pious for far away problems that don’t affect us.
>>534256220B A S E D
>>534257222You Should Apply, Tranny
>>534277385Time to repost the thread several more times.OP needs to properly link the donation page.https://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/2025/10/lawsuit-seeking-to-ban-circumcision-as-discriminatory-genital-cutting-passes-crucial-legal-test.html
>>534256440>It is hypocritical to be against eating people but not against eating pigsHoly shit, is this the best JIDF can do? Yes, it is horrifying what happens to animals in factory farms, but you're deflecting from the issue. Circumcision is in fact worse, because circumcision causes brain damage when performed on an infant, and circumcised babies grow up into brain damaged adults:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7702013/>Neonatal male circumcision is associated with altered adult socio-affective processing>Early-circumcised men reported lower attachment security and lower emotional stability while no differences in empathy or trust were found. Early circumcision was also associated with stronger sexual drive and less restricted socio-sexuality along with higher perceived stress and sensation seeking.
>>534260628>More importantly in my opinion, I think most of the harm of circumcision comes from extremely severe PTSD and trauma suffered in rare casesSee what was posted here: >>534278225Circumcision status causes measurable behavioral changes in adulthood. I wonder how much suffering the lower attachment security and lower emotional stability, increased stress and increased sensation seeking have caused people without themselves even realizing that their circumcision had anything to do with it. Being circumcised is making millions of people's lives worse in subtle ways, ways that they can never even be fully self cognizant of because they can never know what personality they would've had had they not had their mental development scarred by circumcision.
bump
