>>534278793anyone find it strange how scientific equations regarding physics and our universe whenever the equation requires an exponent it's always either squared or cubed or some other whole number but never like "to the power of 1.874832"?
>>534278793Einstein is the biggest scientific fraud who ever existed
>>534278793Reminder that he stole Eureka from Edgar Allan Poe
>>534278874>What is the value of C
>>534278874No, it makes sense, we live in the 3rd dimension
>>534279098lol what is the 1/3 meter discrepancy that would make it an even round number? It's easy to fuck up divine measurement systems when you literal chop a 1rd off of a unit of measurement and change the relationship it has with all other coincidences.
>>534278874>it's always either squared or cubedIt's a result of the mathematics and the fact we live in 3 dimensionsIf we were in a 2-dimensional world, gravity would fall off like r^1
>>534278793
>>534278793atomic nuclei are energetically tightly bound.it turns out a lot of the mass of an atomic nucleus (and consequently an atom in general) is due to this binding energy.if you unbind nucleons, the sum of the parts is less massive than the assembled whole.the difference in mass is released as energy in different forms, be it momentum or electromagnetic radiation.that "c" in the equation is the speed of light, which is 3.0e8 m/s, a pretty big number.so you get an absolute shit ton of energy for just a little mass change.it turns out that certain radioactive nuclei can be induced to split by being irradiated with neutrons, and that when they split produce more neutrons.this allows for the possibility of a chain reaction, where if you can get enough neutron flux through an appropriate radioactive material, you can get more neutrons to generate and cause more splitting than neutrons lost to the environment.putting all this together, you just have to find the right material and get enough neutrons to irradiate it to start a chain reaction. this can be accomplished with very pure materials just by forming a ball of the stuff, you, as with various weapons, there can be other devices to help start things going.
>>534279315Holy shit this is actually an intelligent response for this schizo shithole hatesite. Not sure if AI generated or not.
>>534279098Deez nuts
>>534278793E=mc2 + AB (Atomic Bomb)
Also I know you guys hate Jews.. but this is worth 7 minutes of your time. 90% of you won't get it.. but this is for the 10% that will.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnURElCzGc0
>>534278793For me it's E = MC2 + AI
>>534279377no, i just have a physics backgroundi highly recommend reading/listening to The Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqkstoxCHMU&list=PLkx6LocGNTZOe2CfWDGwQGMBpc9ojXRro
You are all fucking physicslets if you don’t understand this
>>534278874There are three components to this. The first is, equations like E=MC2 are short handed versions of more complex equations that actually modify a lot of the necessary elements. It isnt that E=MC2 is untrue, its just wholely not useful in its reduced form for real world applications. The second goes with that, and Physicists will hide those random numbers inside constants. Einstein did this for relatively with the Cosmological Constant. A more familiar example would be pi. Pi isnt exactly the same, but it should help you get the gist of how this ugly 3.14159 etc number is neatly tucked away inside a symbol so we dont have to look at it. The third portion is there really is some level of "why the fuck does pi, e, i, and all these other numbers seem to click together so neatly so often". There have been entire cults built around numbers for this reason, and there is a huge philosophical debate as to what the true nature of numbers are. Because many times it really does feel like it all clicks together a little too well. The reality probably laying halfway between "its coincidence" and "numbers are God bro". >>534279259Brings up a great example of how fundamental aspects of our universe such as how many spatial dimensions we live in likely contribute to why such equations look more neat than we would expect. Particle spin and mass falling neatly into 0.5 and integer increments respectively is another example.
>>534279537I have read that and I liked it. Also his followup book about the making of the H bomb. Good books!
>>534279718i have never looked into any of Rhodes other books, i had no idea this existed. i'll take a look. thanks for the rec
Because the energy required to break U-235 neutron bonds is it's mass x light squared. This is a very large number, but it is obtainable. Once the bonds are broken the U-235's neutrons shoot out, with an energy level above it's mass x light squared level, breaking other U-235 atoms and restarting the process. This is the chain reaction within nuclear explosives.do you have any other high school chemistry questions, OP?>>534278874because if energy levels needed to do meaningful chemical work were not exponential, then most chemicals would just melt at room temperature. Like water, which is a chemical whose state transitions do not require big numbers (exception: sublimation). Though, in general all math numbers can be represented in exponential form and this is very useful when doing engineering as it keeps all your units the same.
>>534278874no. physics is pretty much dressed up geometry multiplied by factors that keep track of units.pretty much all of electromagnetism is like that.
>>534279201I'm not sure why you are talking about the metre, which is literally an arbitrary unit of measure based on a physical constant, the speed of light. It's like saying a day is an arbitrary measure of time.
>>534278874The full equation E=mc2 comes from is m2c4 = E2 - p2c2 where p is the momentum of the object in question and m2c4 is the invariant. Rearranging you can get E = mc2 sqrt{1 + p2/(m2c2)} which if you use the power expansion for sqrt(1+x) = 1 + x/2 -x2/8 ...., looks like E = mc2 { 1 + p2 / 2(m2c2) - ....} and gets you to E = mc2 + p2/2m for small momentum p, defined as mv, showing that the energy of an object is E = mc2 + v2/2m for v much smaller than c. The second term is the Newtonian definition for an object's kinetic energy, which is a nice and expected outcome.
>>534280397Too bad no one notice the plagiarist jew probably didn't even know that.
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the Jews and how they randomly put holes in my socks and shitstains in my underwear?
>>534278961I keep hearing that but I don't hear the scientific explanation of would the scientific truth really be
>>534278793To take fission as our study:You start with atoms of uranium (or plutonium). These have big, heavy nuclei.They split apart into smaller atoms and neutrons.But if you add up the mass of those smaller atoms and neutrons, it doesn't quite equal the mass of the original uranium from which they split. Some of that original mass in the uranium atom has been lost in the form of energy (big explosion).
>>5342788746.023x20^23Avogadro"s NiggerEinstein was a phony
>>534281568It's not that he was wrong, but that he stole the work. The fundamental theory, that mass creates gravity and gravity warps time (closer = slower) is true no matter who got famous for it.Einstein's formula is a mnemonic tho, deliberately fashioned to give the masses a "short and sweet" formula to remember. In truth, like the other anon pointed out mass is actually confined energy for the most part. A block of iron's weight is essentially the "trapped" energy that combined the atoms and keeps the whole thing together, but some formala about releasing this energy would likely not have become a pop culture phenomenon.
Newton was the first to equate energy and mass in 1704. Nikolay Umov invented the equation for it in 1874, e=mc2. And, it was finally tested by splitting Lithium atoms in 1932.Einstein contributed the theory that energy and mass were equivalent because of relativity. Relativity is theory about gravity. It creates a space and time continuum. Nuclear fission is controlled by nuclear force and electromagnetism, not gravity. The space time continuum is meaningless in that context. I don't understand why Relativity is associated with nuclear physics other than people are trying to force this idea that Einstein created nukes. I also don't understand why Relativity is defined as the foundation of energy and mass equivalence when E=mc2 was invented by Umov before the idea of Relativity.A nuclear explosion converts a tiny amount of neutrons to energy. The formula e=mc2 summarizes how much energy can be released. What this has to do with space and time is beyond me - Einstein's theory about relativity should not be associated with it, nor did e=mc2 arise from such a theory.
>>534282240It is not true or proven that gravity warps time. In fact, the opposite has been proven several times by quantum mechanics - the first time in the 1970s when quantum entanglement was verified, and more recently in 2022 when it was proven even further by the Nobel Prize winner for physics, Clauser.There is no space time continuum. Relativity is not true or proven. Relativity does not explain gravity either. Einstein and his non sense have been force fed to us year after year, meanwhile going undiscussed, there are Nobel Prizes being handed out to scientists proving that it is wrong.
>>534279315Quality post
>>534278874ignore every other reply and google “taylor series.”
>>534283527on one hand, most "laws" in physics are the first non-zero term of a taylor series expansion of the underlying physicson the other hand, a lot of powers in basic equations have absolutely nothing to do with a series expansion, and everything to do with geometric considerationsohm's law (V=IR)? taylor expansioncoulomb's law (1/R^2)? geometric factorkinect energy (v^2)? neither an expansion or geometric factor
>>534278793It didn't. History is filled with discoveries and inventions based on knowledge that was later revised or discarded all together. All that paperwork is not the path to innovation but only a means of communication. Often that communication is internally and a good example of that is Tesla's account of his experience of discovering the magnetic dynamics in an imaginary device that today is as common as a wall socket. But you can't escape the fact that his work on this was totally internally between the unconscious and abstract mind. You must realize that at the time a science paper was less important than the skilled men who actually built and tested the bomb until it functioned. Same thing with the Saturn rockets that can't be duplicated today because the kind of men who built them were phased out decades ago in exchange for low-wage nigger cattle.
>>534278961He got caught stealing Patents from the office where he worked in Germany...Escaped to Mutt-MerrickaWhere ZOG Pimped the thief as some-sort of Physics super-hero...He was Zionist-thieving semi-it.
>>534278793>Indian education
>>534279147>No, it makes sense, we live in the 3rd dimensionthis doesn't make sense though, dimension itself is entirely built by the observer.Without the observer there is no dimension.I can imagine a dimension completely incomprehensible to the human mind, and it's more real than man made numbers.Help, prove me wrong
>>534278793Energy = Mass * Speed of Light. If you release enough mass close to the speed of light, you get a huge amount of energy in an instant (big explosion).
>>534284125Or rather convert*
>>534281568If you think his "explanation" is scientific then you must also think the "explanation" behind Shabbat laws is scientific
>>534278874Nigger have you ever heard of e
>>534284125>If you release enough mass close to the speed of lightIt has nothing to do with speed.
>>534278793It's not. Nuke is fake and gay.
>>534284061The outside world is unknown and unknowable. Because, your observation is of the mind which is presenting the aggregate of the senses. The senses are limited to a very narrow range of what "is".So in a way you are correct and incorrect at the same time. More than likely you are still assimilating this knowledge and not yet able to communicate it directly. This is not intended as an insult, I'm just a way station. You're doing fine.
>>534278793mind you, nuclear bomb physics is actually a guarded secret and you only get to learn about it in a military compound classroom with security clearance
>>534278793it defines the maximum energy release from the conversion of matter into energyone of the biggest hurdles to the development of nuclear weapons was fear that they might be powerful enough to blow the entire world up, or any of several other possibilities like burning a hole clear through the planet (called "China Syndrome," on the assumption a bomb detonated in the USA could burn a hole clear to China), having the same effect on earth as an asteroid strike as large as the one that created the moonEinstein's equation proved that there was a limit to how much energy could possibly be released, based on the mass of the nuclear material, and thus could be controlled for, allowing proper testing without fear of overly destructive consequences
>>534284315>nuclear bomb physics is actually a guarded secretThere is no secret. It's all lie, and bluff.
>>534281568The fact that he is known for E=MCsquared, and it was already known at the time thanks to others, say everything. Einstein was basically the Nigger Scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson of his time
>>534278793It doesn't, it just measures how big the explosion is going to be based on how much mass you're converting into energy.
>>534284061An "observer" doesn't imply what you think.It's just any phenomenon that experiences a change in its existence due to interaction with another.A light photon being dragged by gravity, 1/1000th of an angle off its previous course, is an "observation" because information was transferred.You don't have to have a sensory organ to record observations and turn them into more meaningful data for an observable interaction to have occurred.You bought into the hippy bullshit that if you close your eyes the world goes away, because you thought only your personal sensory perspective mattered to the reality we live in.We are amazing and powerful creatures who have unlimited potential, but we're not anywhere near that point yet, anon.So yes, that means when a rock rolls, that's an observation despite no sensory organ to transform the data into brain waves.Hope that helps clear it up.
>>534283256>Nobel PrizesAs if those werent pozzed as well.Physics beyond what you need to build bridges or planes are useless.
>>534281767>Einstein was a phonyHe was definitely smart but his contributions are exaggerated largely due to Israeli propaganda campaigns that push to identify Jewish people as intelligent. They're kind of trying to do the same thing with Heisenberg right now, they want to retcon how important the jewish physicists were.
>>534279660>>534278874Math hoaxers btfo
>>534284125Trouble is you can't measure gravity and mass independently of each other. In reality there is no mass, or at least it's yet to be discovered. The closer we look for it the more we discover it's all just energy. But what is energy? Define it independently and you will find yourself well into theoretical physics trying to understand how an electro wave and a magnetic wave tied together is the basis of the entire physical universe. Where do these waves come from and what is expressing them? The Ether, God, an Absolute Reality? Wait, how did we end up in myth territory?Ah, such are the myteries of life and life is good.
>>534284495>he typed, broadcasting his retarded opinion on magic electric rocks (semiconductor devices)
>>534284550>Behold, a "mass"
>>534284550>Trouble is you can't measure gravity and mass independently of each other.this nigga has never heard of a mass balance
It was an improvement on the working physics model. Not technically correct, but better then previous models. Midwits often take it to mean that time isn't constant, time travel is possible, that time and mass are interchangeable, it was a big part of the big bang creationist myth. In reality the equation just gave a rough outline as to how to convert some mathematical units. It helped work out things like how to calculate algorithms without machine time, how to calculate velocity in a zero gravity environment, how much energy was needed to destroy an atom. Most of these conclusions were totally theoretical and took decades of white people working to actually do any of those things, yet eventually we did indeed work out how to concerntrate enough force to destroy an atom.How much of that is Einstein's work? None. Einstein couldn't even correct his own formula, to this day it's still not complete/ correct but hey.
>>534283256>It is not true or proven that gravity warps time.Let me just naively ask why time passes faster on the moon then? Sure, it's just a fraction of a second each minute, but still, the phenomenon is real and gravity affecting time does explain it.
>>534278874This is not true, look up critical exponents in phase transitions and percolation theory. This board is full of retarded subhumans.>>534279660Spin falling into half-integer representations is ultimately due to the topology of the (proper orthochronous) Poincare group, namely the fact that its universal cover is in particular a double cover. This holds in all spacetime dimensions greater than 2, so spin would be indexed the same way in 4 or 5 or 17 dimensional space.
>>534284550Yes you can. There have been many experiments measuring inertial and gravitational mass independently to determine whether they really are equal (so far as we can tell, they are). Another example of a long ass speculative post on /pol/ based on a patently false, easily refuted premise.> t. actual physicist
>>534284620A magnet surrounded by fine ferromagnetic pieces in a pattern formed by the magnetic forces which are aligned in said magnet.Now do mass.
>>534284495Lmao get a load of this brown retard. Do you really think you can build the device you’re shitposting on with just mechanics and stress-strain curves?
>>534284924Then define mass independently.
The hostile nature of people who "know".
>>534285000Literally any introductory mechanics text book does this, 19 year old mulatto broccoli heads are more informed about this than you are. Inertial mass is the proportionality constant between applied force and ensuing acceleration. Gravitational mass is the charge of the gravitational interaction. They are conceptually distinct but conveniently happen to be numerically equal (as far as anyone has been able to tell).https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle
>>534278874constants are simplified to letters like aforementioned pi and c etc. so you only have variables left and you simplify an equation you cannot get a non integer number (besides a fraction)
>>534284946It’s okay to just say you were just speculating and don’t really know what you’re talking about. Nobody will be mad. You don’t have to dig your heels in to defend a low effort shitpost against encroachment by reality.
>>534284413I didn't know that
>>534284413This is sort of true but misleading because this is a low IQ board. The equations Einstein used had already been discovered by the mathematician Poincare, and Poincare publicly acknowledged this but still conceded that the discovery belonged to Einstein because he had been the first one to correctly interpret the equations and apply them to physics.
>>534279660>Just clicks>numbers are God bro".Really good write up anon, you also just described the basis for the Intelligent Design argument
>>534284946>ferromagnetic pieces yeah, "a magnet". It's why I said "mass">formed by the magnetic forces which are aligned in said magnet.Okay but how do they work? It's still a mass of iron.
>>534281258You've got dryer Jews, too?
>>534279660This “debate” is for brainlets who don’t know formal logic and model theory. What numbers are is unambiguous to any trained mathematician, it’s not mystical woowoo.>>534285234Do you fall for this kind of shit often? I should give up honest research and make a career out of scamming you rubes.
>>534285147I asked for definition not a garble of models. I do understand that is the school of thought you are larping from but we are again at the point where we are arguing models instead of reality. If you can't form a simple explanation or at least pose an intellectual challenge then you hardly even understand your own models. Then you want me to believe you're a PHD? The lack of emotional control here is always a dead giveaway. Nobody is impressed.
>>534283256Quantum entanglement being observable is a completely different proposition from time dilation being observable. You are either lying or retarded or both.
>>534285402I gave you a definition. You chose to ignore it because you’re retarded and desperately need to believe that you’ve unlocked some deep mystical truth “the man” doesn’t want you to know.News flash, you’re not a free thinker, you’re a retard who can’t read a mechanics textbook. If you’re gonna claim to have flipped all of modern physics on its head you should at least know the basics any greasy grad student is required to know.
>>534285322That doesn't define mass, not even a viable example of it. You are answering something I did not ask. Try being less jewish.
>>534285485I defined mass and you have ignored that post because it’s inconvenient. What was the last physics class you took? Be honest.
>>534278793I wonder what he gooned to
>>534283520this is bullshit. The Einstein equation was associated with nuclear bomb by journalists, maybe it was even a misleading psyop. Energy of the explosion comes can be explained with classic electrostatic repulsion, once the protons leave binding potential of strong nuclear force which held them inside the atom, the general estimation can be done by a highschooler in a few lines. Relativistic calculations weren't necessary for designing nuclear bombs. Everything was already achievable with classic electrodynamics, statistical thermodynamics and quantum physics. The main occasion was discovery of possibility to punch protons out of atoms with other particles and Turn the original atomic nucleus configuration unstable.If you don't believe me, read Serber's "los Alamos primer" lectures, where he says the same.
>>534278793It's incomplete without AI
>>534285480I claimed no such thing. If anything I was paraphrasing Tesla. Your emotional outburst and insults were your leade while making a failed attempt to draw my question into your school of thought when I specifically stated what I wanted. You failed the challenge and are seething about it. But any kind of professional? I don't even need to say it. Just be better next time, nigger.
>>534285574Thisand thank you.
>>534278961Anyone who says this is a retard whose never read his papers
>>534285672> wordswordswordsYour statement was patently false and anybody with google can verify that. You can in fact define and measure mass independently of gravity. I name you a liar.
>>534285485>That doesn't define mass,What defines it as a mass is the iron you tard (the amount of iron specifically). It's literally just material. For some reason you define it as something else when it's simply geomanced iron. >You are answering something I did not ask.Good?>Try being less jewish.No see if I were a jew I would invent a dualism that separates the same quantity..."mass" of "geomanced iron" from "iron" despite both having no physical difference. I would then call it "two forces" instead of one because I can't argue hard enough with my God to define it as one.
>>534278793Idunno but I saw an UAP in 2014 doing alcubierre type movement so I'm convinced more evolved species can literally warp the fabric of space-time to move through it.I saw hovering, instant acceleration beyond anything humans can do with no sound or other signature
How did this equation not create zero point energy by now?
>>534286505I have no idea what the guys math is doing there but I agree
>>534286528This is related to the 11 missing/dead NASA scientists.Imho it's the real shit kikes try to slide
>>534278793You can learn any equation you want. The difficult part is putting it to use outside the laboratory.
>>534278961This, he piggybacked all of his ideas off of non-jewish scientists and then took credit for all of it. >Eistein created the nuclear bombNo, there were actually a lot of scientists working on the Manhattan Project but it is interesting how only Einstein gets all of the credit as if he singlehandedly created the nuclear bomb. The only reason he got all the credit is because he is jewish and the guy is a fraud taking from other people's works but giving them no credit for it essentially writing it off as his own.
>>534279377tbf at ~>50% bot traffic as of 1/26, It's mostly agitation / division / "4chan says bad words", with some actual 11-21 y.o.'s regurgitating the rhetoric. I hopefully doubt the actual population of the site, considering the ideologies here, is that bad.
>>534286557oh yeah,that female scientist was intending to disclose - not sure if you saw the following : https://youtu.be/QatWn2nMQnw?si=GAF6mnPDoGKe1Svjabsolutely crazy - they literally killed her for this
777 get too lmaoBINGO BITCHES THEY KILLING THOSE WHO WANT TO DISCLOSE
>>534286725I doubt a bigger population can contribute anything noteworthy for science™. The field of the Truth is not about popularity, more so competition, and there is only 1 winner.
>>534286777Checked, no didn't see that one yet, thx.
>>534278874Tegmark has something to say about this I believe. I've been cooking some theoretical material that explains why you never run across m^23/s^-17. Basically energy, on an epistemic level, implies a type system that closes over a finite number of types that goes hand in hand with the theory being expressable in a finite quantity of symbols while guaranteeing it closes over the domain of transformations it purports to explain (and this is how energy is conserved).
>>534278793It doesn't.Nuclear power/bombs work because the strong force is so much stronger than electromagnetism.Any release of energy obeys E=MC2.When you discharge a battery for example it also gets lighter according to E=MC2.Nothing special about releases of energy involving the strong force.
>>534278793I'll explain later.
>>534279499Why watch the jew when you can read Flatland (which is exactly what Sagan is referencing here) which was written by an English theologian over 100 years ago.
>>534279499Schizo max nigger, those black shadows you see and those voices you hear and those dicks you feel entering your ass and those smells you imagine and those tastes that come from nowhere are all imagine are you eating someone's ass from another dimension you fucking pervert.
Einstein was amazing. He was able to come up with so many amazing groundbreaking theories and discoveries while working full time at the patent office. 50 years at the highest levels of academia not so much.
If Einstein continued working at the patent office, he would have solved all the mysteries of the universe.
>>534288541they would've murked or silenced him if he discovered too muchchange my mind
>>534278793It’s actually a really simple device. They use e=mc^2 to discourage people from making one.
>>534278874With physics equations, its largely because of math and geometry. Take a 1D line, integrate it over the arc length of a circle (2π) and you get the equation for the area of a circle (2D), integrate it again and you get the volume of a sphere (3D).The constants are much more mysterious. Why is the gravitational constant 6.67430 × 10-11? Every other part of physics equations is based on pure mathematical logic, but the constants are what they are because that specific number just happens to be the correct one for an unknown reason.
>>534285081>as far as anyone has been able to tellAt the scale of solar systems, but at galactic scales that didn't conform with observations. The arms of spiral galaxies were too fast, there was either too much inertia or not enough gravity. Thus dark mater was invented, and now the majority of the universe is comprised of this undetectable material, in whatever quantity and distribution makes the suppositions unfalsifiable.
