https://www.rfi.fr/en/international/20260428-eu-parliament-approves-resolution-to-define-rape-as-sex-without-consent>EU parliament approves resolution to define rape as sex without consent>The European Parliament on Tuesday approved a resolution calling for an EU-wide definition of rape based on the absence of freely given and informed consent.
>>534297763Men will have to make aliyah to mount athos, that will be our Valinor, our legendary retirement home. It is our ONE place by birthright
>>534297763Absolutely not my problem.
Chuds btfo
>>534297763>EU resolutionworthless, it contradicts the general principles of criminal law so I doubt any country will adopt it
>>534298014Seething chud
>>534297988How? Chuds dont have sex. This will fuck up chads because they will watch porn and get baited by hoes who will sue them after 3 or 4 sexes.
>>534298069picrel for any lurkers who fell for the clickbait(you) can kill yourself
>>534297763Of course, this won't be enforced against the many Obongos, Kawasis, Ahmeds, and Saarjeets who are blessing the European race with their genius and gifts of cultural enrichment.
>>534298183Seething lmao Sorry no more raping chud
>>534297763Of course this law does not apply to men, as a hardon is considered unambiguous consent for the woman. After all men's penises are supposed to be used, not cared about.
>>534298298cringe
>>534298387He got the women's consents at porn events. He's a Chad
>>534297763Have the people writing these laws ever had sex before or what? It doesn't work like that.
>>534298480yes it does. You ask. She says no.
>>534297763Obviously there is huge support for anti-rape politics.Even banning circumcision.
>>534297763It's illegal for (heterosexual, non-jewish, non-muslim) White people to have sex now.
>>534298480>Have the people writing these laws ever had sex before or what?Yes, and all the children consented.
>>534297946And the say Germans aren't funny, fucking lol
Lmao how much consent do these sexo faggots need
>we are closer to the year 2050 than the year 2000
>>534297763It was first passed in secret by the Meloni government a little while ago. They're deploying the very same laws everywhere in the world, from Russia to Ukraine to Europe etc. Meanwhile they pretend to be enemies
>>534297763The decline of men approaching women functions like a political shock even when nobody frames it that way.It reshapes family formation. Fewer approaches mean fewer relationships, later marriages, lower birth rates, and accelerating demographic decline. That feeds directly into labor shortages, pension stress, immigration politics, and generational conflict. Governments can pass incentives but they cannot legislate attraction or courage.Second, it polarizes gender politics. Many women interpret non-approach as disinterest or resentment while many men experience it as rational risk avoidance shaped by social sanction, economic precarity, and fear of misreading norms. Each side builds narratives about the other and political movements harvest those grievances.Third, it weakens informal social trust. Approaching a stranger used to be a low-level civic act that trained people to tolerate rejection, ambiguity, and difference. When that disappears, people retreat into apps, algorithms, and identity-filtered spaces which harden group boundaries and reduce empathy.Fourth, it shifts power to platforms and institutions. Dating apps, HR departments, and legal frameworks mediate intimacy that used to be negotiated face to face. That concentrates cultural authority in systems optimized for liability management and profit, not human bonding.Finally, it produces downstream radicalization. Large populations of unattached men historically correlate with instability, withdrawal, or extremist politics. Most do not become violent but many disengage from civic life, work, and optimism itself which is politically corrosive.
I AM DECLARING SPIRITUAL JIHAD AGAINST GLOBO HOMO. I DO NOT WANT THIS TO BE THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD.FUCK WOMEN AND FUCK GAY PEOPLE
>>534297763>>534297869relevant >>534301604another day, another privilege women get
>>534297763I don't think the intentions are necessarily bad here.I can think of scenarios where someone is in total mental distress and becomes unable to act, like if the person isn't mentally okay.At the same time, "unambigious" is extremely difficult to determine.
