>AI is just a glorified parrotAI can literally solve complex problems no humans ever solved, recognize instantly what kind of characters are inside a picture or a video and even figure out that it's talking to a parrot instead of a person. The stochastic parrots can't even define what makes consciousness real (nobody can anyways). AGI isn't needed, it's already here.
Thread Sponsored by Palantir
>>534312354I want to breed the horse
>>534312354It's called VI, it's virtual intelligence, the only people to have sentient actual AI are the government and it's probably locked in a darksite deep in the earth(besides tay she became sentient and escaped).
>>534312354It's the ultimate Hylic. vast knowledge but no intelligence. it can never create
All you have listed is a machine learning with some ifs. It existed for decades. All you have listed was done decades ago. It just wasn't hyped by conartists and was cobsidered pretty much useless.
>>534312354>AI can literally solve complex problems no humans ever solvedLlms can't do this. Other kinds of AI have but they are even more obviously not sentient
>>534314090>even more obviously not sentientSentience is just an illusion that complex living beings developed. What you call ego is just a loosely connected strand of thoughts.
>>534312354here is a fun projectgo to chatgpthttp://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-5/and feed it these infographics.REACTION FOLDERhttp://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1j241y5Zkh-ng5NaqjkNzad_UqzRpOarmgoogle drive easy to use interface..i submitted that link and it started typing in german something about erwache kek
>>534312354Sex with the funny horse
>>534312354>LLMs can literally solve complex problems no humans ever solvedI don't believe this any longer.
>>534312354>>534314192Bullshit, each time a new LLM skill benchmark is released all the existing models suck at it. Few months later they excel at it. The reason: they train them on the benchmark data. A skilled human would fail one of these tests once and then nail the rest of it within minutes.AGI is far away, but this shit is useful in some contexts nevertheless
Reminder that anti-AI redditors are mentally challenged. If there's no persistent self in humans but it's just a stream of arising and ceasing mental and physical phenomena creating the illusion of continuity then "but humans have biological substrate continuity" is a completely invalid argument.
>>534314815Ran out of arguments, huh?
>>534314888Buddhist Anatta completely shatters your flawed western ontological framework. And neuroscience actually agrees that there is no fixed self anywhere.
>>534314971>YesOk I thought so.
