We keep hearing neocons screech about how > we can’t let Iran have a heckin nuckerino, muh 47 yeaes saaar!as an excuse for every retarded thing they do, but why not? If Iran had a nuke, best case scenario they do nothing and just use it as deterrence. Israel would leave them the fuck alone and we would’ve never been dragged into this gay war. Best Korea has a nuke and MAD seems to ensure peace in the region.Worst case scenario, Iran nukes Israel and Israel nukes them right back, and there is eternal peace in the region. Why should I care if Iran has a nuke?
>>534390754Nobody should have nukes.
>>534390754Our current president is clearly more erratic and dangerous when it comes to nuclear destruction than any of these brown shitholese tin pot dictatorships have ever been and we’re mostly fine. Nukes don’t matter, wars are fought with drones and AI now. Let them have a warhead or two as a concession and just ban them from the internet and the chip trade to actually hobble them.
>>534390908But plenty of countries do and they’re not going anywhere. You have to develop policy in the real world, not your convenient fantasy world.
Hegseth and Trump are eager to throw away as many American lives as it takes (just not their own sons, of course) to secure this policy, so we should have a pretty good reason to be pursuing it and I’m not convinced it’s worth it.
>>534390754>We keep hearing neocons screech about howLiterally every Democrat president and presidential candidate in the last 20 years has also said this. Obama, Hillary Clinton, Biden, Harris, all of them.
>>534390908In theory, yes.In practice. I feel this retarded war wouldn't have happened if Iran DID have a nuke.
>>534391104> MUH BIDEN MUH OBAMA LOOK OVER THERE IT’S BIDEN TAKING A NAPNot gonna work, well poisoner. Address the topic at hand instead of indulging your obsession with democrats.
>>534390754Are nukes even real?
>>534391211That’s what I’m saying. My gas would be a dollar cheaper per gallon if Iran had a nuke, so maybe Iran should have a nuke. This is the calculus the average American should be performing. I don’t give a shit about ideological or symbolic wins against mudshits on the other side of the planet. Let them have their toy and leave me and my wallet out of it.
Also can anyone explain picrel?
>>534391322>Address the topic at handThe topic at hand is that you live under a Zionist Occupied Government. It doesn't matter whether it's neo-conservatives or neo-liberals. They both conspire with Jews. That is why you hear both of these groups the same lines such as "all options are on the table." Why is this difficult for you to understand? The next election can not and will not fix the problem, nor will the next ten after that.You ask "why should I care", and the answer is: "Because of the lengths the government will go to in order to continue this psychotic bullshit it engages in on behalf of Jews."
>>534391684I agree with all this. It doesn’t answer my original question: why should I believe any of these rats when they make their feeble excuses? They’re obviously lying which makes me think I should consider the opposite of their “Iran + nukes = LE BAD” premise.
>>534390754when the politicians stop explaining the argument and start using a compressed version or a catchphrase, you know we're cooked
>>534391800>They’re obviously lying which makes me think I should consider the opposite of their “Iran + nukes = LE BAD” premise.You should. I am reminding you that the problem is extremely bipartisan.
>>534391966It is, but I am going to direct most of my criticism towards the party that’s currently in power and making all these bad decisions and braindead excuses. When the democrats get their guy in 2028 and he starts sucking israeli cock, I’ll direct my criticism at him.
>>534390908Everybody should have nukes. No-one is actually insane enough to start a nuclear war except maybe Israel, and if everybody had nukes they'd be wiped off the map if they did long before they could do any major damage. World peace.
